How do you understand that existence is reasonable?

Being is reasonable, which is a category we have in philosophy. As long as all the substances in the world exist, it has a reasonable logic of existence! For example, many of the animals we see in Australia are very strange-looking.

For example, kangaroos in Australia, for example, all of these animals have an evolutionary product that resembles a bag on their stomachs.

In the early days, there were thylacines in this place, and finally after humans landed on the continent of Australia, they were all wiped out in the 19th century, and now the thylacine can still be seen on the symbol of the country of Australia! Many people always have a question? Why is this happening in places in Australia?

How did the phyla evolve such characteristics?

Actually, this problem is very easy to solve, because Australia is an independent continent, and this continent has been separated from the whole continent many years ago, which determines that all species on this continent are isolated from gene exchange between species on other continents! Therefore, their evolution has been limited to a certain extent, in order to be able to survive in a limited place, and to be able to protect the survival of young children, so such evolutionary characteristics appeared! In that sense, what exists is reasonable!

Many people who go to Africa can see giraffes, this animal has a particularly long neck, like an amazing species! So how can this happen? Actually, from an evolutionary point of view, this is also reasonable!

Because the ancient giraffes have long necks and short necks, when the climate changes and there is no grass, the giraffes with short necks will not be able to eat the leaves in the high places, and they will naturally be eliminated, and those giraffes with long necks can reach the leaves on the branches in the high places, so they have avoided the phenomenon of being eliminated and slowly survived, so that the development of generation after generation, we can only see the giraffe with a long neck on the African continent, and we can not see my biggest giraffe!

So what exists is reasonable!

Existence is reasonable, which means that as long as you have it, there is a certain basis for this thing. For some things, it is very likely that we will have certain doubts and doubts about his existence. At this time, we often hesitate to believe whether we should believe it or not, and then we can prove and illustrate the situation through some examples.

For example, when we are confronted with something we haven't seen or heard something we haven't heard. The first reaction is definitely who is true and who is false, whether we should believe whether it is reliable for us, whether it is practical and true. This is still decided according to each person's different personality and thinking logic, because some people will maintain a neutral attitude and ideas about things we don't know.

They feel that if they don't involve themselves, they won't feel that such things don't exist and are unreliable. On the contrary, they will feel that they should have each other's ideas, and mutual understanding and understanding are crucial.

So, when we encounter different ideas colliding. We must face it with mutual respect and understanding. Because your thoughts do not change the fact that the other person exists, but your thoughts create doubts and doubts.

At this time, what you have to do is to try to understand or make a change in your thinking, that is, to face the things you do not understand with this inclusive heart. Gradually, you will find that your mind is constantly expanding, and your mood and vision will become clearer.

Since something exists, it means that it is established. Their presence is the best proof of this, because existence means that there is a certain sense of ritual, which will resonate with the people around them. Gradually, we will find that existence is reasonable, and there is a certain meaning.

Everything that exists in this world is supposed to be in line with the laws of this world, so in fact, I always think that this sentence is reasonable and right.

For good things, beautiful things are the objects that people pursue, no matter what it is, everyone will sigh at the magic of nature, there are still such beautiful things, so in fact, people's eyes are more on this kind of things, thinking that beautiful things are the curtains of God, which is the gift of God, but what about some not very good things?

In fact, this is also a reasonable existence, as the saying goes, if there is no evil, there is no good, so in fact, in addition to the contrast of good, evil also has its own value. This phrase is very similar to the saying that Americans have always believed: don't judge.

Don't judge others arbitrarily. Because everyone, whether good or bad, has their own past and will have their own unique experience, so when you don't know the person's past, please don't judge others arbitrarily and make a verdict early.

In fact, this view is very similar to the rationality of existence, and many things can be explained from this and the other.

In the past, I would struggle with a lot of things, and I would be very disgusted with many things. I think it's cool to be a person who loves and hates clearly, and I wonder why some people are so bad, in fact, I was too young and ignorant at the time, and after experiencing some things, I have grown a lot, and I understand that there are many helplessness in this world, and there are so many unspeakable hidden, so I am more and more tolerant, and I feel that everyone has their own mission, maybe we are in a huge drama, and whether the role is good or bad each of us has played a role in it, just showing ourselves.

This sentence seems to be often on people's lips, and they have never paid special attention to this sentence before, that is, they have never thought deeply about this sentence when they are understood literally.

It wasn't until I started debating last year that I first thought deeply about this sentence. I forgot what kind of debate it was at that time, and the other party suddenly threw out this sentence, as an argument of the other side, and we didn't know how to refute it for a while, and the free debate was silent for several seconds, and finally we chose to avoid the question.

So after this debate, I thought about this sentence in particular, and the more I thought about it, the more I felt that this sentence was not right, that what existed was not necessarily rational (at that time, my first reaction was to understand this rationality as rational humanity), such as all kinds of atrocities in the world, although they exist, but it is not reasonable.

So I was thinking that this rationality should not refer to what we usually call rationality, but should be in accordance with the laws of nature, a kind of thing other than people, everything that exists in the world, it should exist in the natural truth, a kind of law of truth that people cannot decide.

So even what exists is not entirely in accordance with human reason.

So I went online again, who said this sentence and in what context, and I found that my guesses and inferences were indeed correct, this sentence came from the mouth of Hegel, and what he said was reasonable is not in line with human reason, but in line with the laws of the universe.

I have also found a more accurate translation of this sentence: everything that is realistic is rational, and everything that is rational is realistic. Of course, I don't think that rationality here should be human reason, but a kind of heavenly way, a kind of natural law.

However, I still have reservations about whether this sentence is right or wrong, and from the perspective of Marx's dialectics, what celebrities say is not necessarily right.

Everyone or thing has a mission! Otherwise, it will not be possible to explain the meaning of life!

Being is reasonable, Hegel said. According to Hegel, the origin of the universe is the Absolute Spirit. It has everything in itself, then externalizes the natural world, human society, spiritual science, and finally returns to itself on a higher level.

Therefore, whatever is on this trajectory of development is rational, that is, it is inevitable and realistic.

Being is rational from Hegel's famous work "Principles of the Philosophy of Law". The Principles of the Philosophy of Law were published in 1820, and then this sentence was one of the most controversial philosophical propositions of the time. This statement is still controversial to this day, mainly because some people think that Hegel is making a normative claim about what is real:

The real thing has to be true.

Existence is reasonable, it is an abstract concept. This existence can be divided into subjective existence and objective existence, and rational means that it conforms to cognitive principles. The principle of cognition is the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity.

So what is this relationship? It is a relationship of coexistence and interaction. The subject is embraced by the object, and the subject's perception of the object.

The interaction between the two that cannot coexist at the same time is the rationality of existence.

The subject's perception of the object, that is, the existence of the subject's perception, and the subject's retrospective objective existence.

The premise of the subject's retrospective objective existence is that it assumes a purely objective existence after abandoning subjective perception. This assumption is a method of verification that cannot be used by the subject to perceive objective reality. We assign this assumption to the subject's "subjective rationality" in cognition of the object.

This assumption is itself a subjective intervention. In other words, subjective rationality is a premise based on subjective intervention.

Whereas a purely objective existence is an objective existence that seeks to exclude subjective intervention. This in itself is a set of cognitive contradictions. This contradiction is man-made.

We strive to regard the subjective cognition that has been intervened by human beings as the subjective rationality of human beings, and believe that subjective rationality is the correct cognition of objective laws.

Existence is reasonable, which expresses a rationality for the totality of objective nature and subjective cognition. This rationality itself includes the subjective existence of irrationality.

The irrationality in this case is all subjective perception beyond the presuppositions of human intervention.

If you ask why it's unreasonable, he'll tell you it's because you're out of the premise. If you ask him whether the presupposition itself is objective or subjective, he will use his power or freedom to tell you the final truth.

Summary. Being is reasonable, Hegel said.

Being is reasonable, Hegel said.

"Existence is reasonable" is the classic theory of the famous German philosopher Hegel, this sentence has also been applied to many people's lives, but in fact, many people understand it wrongly, and it is not the meaning of "rationality and legitimacy" understood in Chinese.

Hegel's original meaning is more appropriate to interpret with "causality", that is, there is a certain causal relationship and reason for the operation of things, and the operation of everything is inseparable from the reasons behind it. Therefore, it is more reasonable to understand rationality as "logical and boring".

Material consciousness is captured by spiritual consciousness, but the laws of material consciousness images make it difficult for spiritual consciousness to distinguish between truth and falsehood. Therefore, it is necessary to change the spiritual consciousness and combine the material laws to make the spiritual consciousness more reasonable and the material law consciousness. To achieve the goal of making the external spiritual material consciousness reasonable to the combined material consciousness.

It may be that existence is reasonable.

The existence of all things has its own traceable causes and laws, which have nothing to do with ethics and morality, nor do they involve good and evil, but only the general laws of the cognition of all things.

The phrase existence is reasonableness is a linguistic disease, existence is not necessarily reasonable, but stress is in line with cause and effect.

The connotation of "existence is reasonable" is that "existence" as everything in the world itself has objectivity and inevitability, and its "reasonableness" is the embodiment of this objectivity and inevitability. "Reasonable" only has the objective meaning of "existence", but does not have the "right and wrong" meaning of "existence". ‍‍

He exists because the conditions he constitutes are sufficient. If the conditions are sufficient, certain phenomena will inevitably occur. Causality of existence and condition.

In fact, this sentence expresses materialism. Existence is matter, and rationality is consciousness. Matter determines consciousness, let's be simple and rude.

It should also be explained that I personally feel that this reasonableness is the rationality of purely objective understanding, and it has nothing to do with the reasonableness that does not conform to our subjective values. This is because the existence of ugly phenomena has its own objective basis and logic, and is objective and reasonable, but it obviously cannot conform to the rationality of our subjective values.

I think that "existence is reasonable" expresses the "cause and effect" relationship that ancient thinkers said, "there is a cause to have an effect, and there must be a cause if there is an effect". Whatever it is, as long as it is real is a thing, a phenomenon, etc., that exists....Then it has the rationality of its existence, and there must be a reason that can explain its rationality. ‍‍

Juelin Bodhisattva has a saying: The heart is like a painter, he can paint the world, and the five aggregates are born from birth, and he does not create anything. Therefore, to be able to exist, since it can exist, of course, this existence itself is reasonable, but the continuation and development that arises after its existence is not necessarily reasonable, because first of all, the root of all things is connected by cause and effect, and the continuation after existence must conform to cause and effect, if it does not conform to it, it will be eliminated, and it must conform to the universal value orientation, if it does not conform to it, it will be terminated, and it must conform to its own advantages and disadvantages, if it does not conform, then although this existence is reasonable, its continuation and development are unreasonable.