At present, the international research status of genetically modified technology and the attitude to

1. Traditional hybrid breeding is actually large-scale, purposeless transgenic breeding. The crossbreeding of donkeys and horses produces mules, and the sterility of mules does not prevent human use, just as people who eat pork do not become pigs, people who eat the meat of mules do not become sterile, and people who eat genetically modified foods will not be genetically modified.

2. The most technologically advanced Americans in the world feel that it doesn't matter, they have eaten it themselves for more than ten years. Some say Americans don't eat it themselves. The landlord can calculate that 80% of the soybeans in the United States are genetically modified crops, can the Americans themselves not eat them?

3. Europe's technology is slightly worse, Europe's own genetically modified crops are not as productive as the United States, so Europe is resistant to American genetically modified crops, and at the beginning of 2010, Europe has approved the large-scale planting of genetically modified potatoes (this news can be found on the regular news network).

China's No. 1 document clearly proposes to "continue to implement major scientific and technological projects for the cultivation of new varieties of genetically modified organisms, develop functional genes and new biological varieties with important application value and independent intellectual property rights, and promote the industrialization of new genetically modified varieties on the basis of scientific evaluation and management in accordance with the law." It can be seen that China's first attitude towards genetically modified organisms is also to encourage and promote development.

The landlord also doesn't have to listen to killpear1, that guy will only copy this paragraph, he shouldn't even know what "genetically modified" is.

Yuan Longping in China is also engaged in, basically the international level of opposition to genetically modified crops is based on the uncertainty brought by genetically modified crops to the natural biological chain, rather than food safety, of course, except for the domestic, there are too many NCs in China.

Genetically modified food refers to a new variety of food formed by changing the genetic material of plants and animals through genetic technology to produce expected traits and specific characteristics, which has been a controversial topic in recent years. My view is that genetically modified foods can solve problems such as food shortages and reduce the use of pesticides, but they should be strengthened and consumers' right to know should be strengthened.

Genetically modified food is an inevitable product of the development of modern agriculture. With the help of genetic technology, scientists can disconnect and recombine the genes of certain cells to improve their yield, disease resistance, insect resistance, drought resistance, etc., on the basis of ensuring the original nutrients of food. The emergence of genetically modified foods can solve the problem of food shortage faced by the rapid growth of the global population, so as to ensure people's food safety.

In addition, plants or animals treated with genetically modified technology are more resistant to pests and diseases, and can reduce the use of pesticides, antibiotics and other chemicals in agricultural production, which not only contributes to environmental protection, but also protects human health.

However, the safety of genetically modified foods has been controversial. Although most studies believe that the carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, toxicity and other hazards of this food are relatively small, there are still some scientists who believe that genetically modified foods may produce unpredictable mutations in the human body, causing serious consequences. In addition, at present, the transgenic technology has not yet fully matured, and the probability and risk of some undesirable Nalaochang are worthy of vigilance.

Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen supervision and management in the production of genetically modified foods to ensure that they meet food safety standards, and let consumers know the ingredients of these foods, food safety and other relevant information. The key to solving the problem is to ensure that food will not cause potential harm to human health by realizing the full traceability of products through legal labeling, and at the same time continuously strengthening food safety management such as food inspection, certification and labeling.

In short, genetically modified foods not only have their advantages, but also face greater safety risks. In the process of production and consumption, we should increase supervision and improve food safety standards to ensure the health and safety of people who dismantle barriers. After all, people's physical health and life safety are the most important thing, and these cannot be violated by any interests.

Resolutely resist genetically modified food !!

It is said that due to the expression of imported genes, the heritable modification of biological traits is caused, and this technology is called transgenic technology.

Genetically modified technology refers to the use of molecular biology technology to transfer the genes of certain organisms to other species, modify the genetic material of organisms, and make the organisms whose genetic material has been modified transform to the goal of human needs in terms of traits, nutrition and consumption quality. Genetically modified technology has a wide range of application prospects in many fields such as agricultural production, animal feeding and medical research.

The world's first transgenic plant was a tobacco containing antibiotic antibodies, which was successfully bred in 1983. The world's first genetically modified food was a genetically modified late-maturing tomato that was put on the U.S. market in 1993.

At present, the United States is the country with the most extensive cultivation of genetically modified crops in the world, accounting for 66% of the global planting area of genetically modified crops. About 80 percent of soybeans, 75 percent of cotton, and 40 percent of corn in the U.S. are genetically modified crops. In contrast to the United States, the European Union is much more conservative in its attitude towards GMOs.

The only genetically modified crops allowed to be planted in the EU are soybeans, corn and rape, etc., and the planting area accounts for only 0 3 of the world's genetically modified crop area.

However, since the advent of the first genetically modified organisms, the debate about genetically modified technology and genetically modified foods has never stopped. The main concerns about GM technology are: whether food containing pest-resistant genes is a threat to human health; the environmental impact of genetically modified products; whether genetically modified products will destroy biodiversity; the ethical issues raised by genetically modified products, and so on.

The above is for reference.

From a purely molecular point of view, genetically modified foods should be harmless to humans.

But pay attention to that word, it should.

In any case, I think it is feasible for genetically modified foods to go to the market, but genetically modified foods must be strictly labeled, so that consumers have the right to choose and know.

If you want to scientifically prove that genetically modified foods are harmful or harmless, you need long-term and rigorous testing. The 90-day GM food feeding of the first generation of mice is undoubtedly unable to prove the safety of genetically modified rice.

However, in my opinion, even if there are the most rigorous and long-term tests that prove that a certain type of genetically modified food is harmless, it must be labeled with strict labeling --- consumers have the right to know.

To add, I would buy genetically modified foods because of my personal knowledge of science, telling me that genetically modified foods are not harmful to humans.

Science is the primary productive force, and the progress of science and technology comes from innovation, and scientists should be allowed and encouraged to conduct exploratory research. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, the public should have a tolerant attitude towards genetically modified crops, and the state should provide appropriate support for research on genetically modified crops, not only to study their value, but also to study their potential dangers.

Food safety is the most important thing for the people, and new plants can only enter the food category after long-term and strict inspection. Therefore, from the perspective of food safety, the promotion of genetically modified foods should be strictly controlled, and they should not be used in a large area too early without sufficient evidence to prove their safety.

To sum it up in one sentence, genetically modified crops should be treated with "leniency and caution".

The answer recommended above is more correct, but it is only based on the scientific aspect of agriculture, and now the problem is no longer only a scientific problem, but also an economic and political problem.

On these two points, let me add that it doesn't matter who the landlord distributes, let's **.

First of all, it is clear that there are risks associated with genetically modified foods, and similar risks have already occurred once in Brazil, so the harm to the health and ecology of Chinese people by introducing genetically modified foods is conceivable.

And then we introduced!

Personally, I think there are two reasons for this.

First, the human factor.

In the 80s, the United States commissioned the United States to train 50 doctors of agriculture for China for free, and these people are currently serving as backbones in the agricultural sector and graduate students, so to speak, they are all "American", you let them not engage in genetically modified organisms, what is the reason for their existence?

Second: national conditions: both horizontal and vertical are death, quick death, it is better to slow down.

Traditional crops require fertilization, and "potash fertilizer" is very important, and the world's potash mines are concentrated in Canada and Germany.

Let's take Canada as an example: Canada's potash ore sales are double standards, treating the country, it is the free competition of various potash mining enterprises, and farmers are the lowest ****, so that the people can enjoy preferential agricultural products.

Externally, they will set up a special agency to set a very expensive standard export price, and all companies must export potash ore higher than this standard, in order to protect their own country's resources, sell foreign monopolies, and earn money from developing countries.

In this case, some time ago, it was revealed that Australia's BHP Billiton company had acquired Canada's second largest potash mining company, the purpose of which was to snipe at the Chinese agricultural market. The same applies to Germany.

At present, 70% of China's arable land is deficient in potassium, and under the situation that potash ore imports are expensive and Australia, Canada and other countries are oppressed by the "wolf", there is only one way to be genetically modified, and this road has long been waiting for the "tiger" of the United States. Just wait for China, the hungry herbivore, to crawl over.

Recently, the United States provided GM technology for China for free? Do you think pie will fall from the sky? Just like Microsoft, when the Windows system becomes popular, it starts charging for lawsuits, and if GMO is widespread in China, the bills of Americans will immediately be on your desk.

The same aim is to control China's agricultural market. Not to mention the safety hazards.

So the current situation in China is that there are wolves in front and tigers in the back, wolves want to bite us to death, and tigers are biting us to death after they have played enough, and there is no difference in essence. Therefore, as a Chinese, you must learn to be self-reliant, and dealing with foreigners is always a transaction, no friends!

Personal opinion.

I haven't checked the information, the following is just a little bit of personal thinking all the time, not necessarily right, welcome to correct.

The safety of genetically modified crops should include food safety, planting safety, ecological security, economic security and many other aspects.

Edible: If it is cooked food, the activity of the gene will definitely be incapacitated during cooking and heating, and there is no danger. If it is raw food, in the past, all biological food hazards were mainly caused by chemical processes, such as the accumulation and transformation of chemical substances.

GMO occurs through the consumption of food or something, hehe, it should be too much to think about. Therefore, of course, the food safety of genetically modified crops should be experimented, but the main focus is on whether there are substances that may be harmful through the chemical reaction of the cooking and digestion process.

Planting safety refers to whether dangerous products (pollen, toxic substances, etc.) occur in the process of planting in a large area, and whether the planting behavior may aggravate ecological damage (for example, the Ming Dynasty in the Yangtze River basin began to open up land on the slopes of the mountains to introduce corn, causing soil erosion, and the Yangtze River began to turn into the Yellow River). And so on. There are also many issues related to the ecological aspect.

Ecological security is very important, because crops may undergo new genetic changes due to their own reproductive variation, or they may also lead to genetic changes of other species through pollen transmission, and these new genetic species may become invasive special species in the ecology and cause ecological disasters. In addition, it may also cause changes in the behavior and quantity of stealing organisms (rats, birds, etc.) through certain hormone-like substances, or cause changes in water and soil through excessive absorption of water nutrients and special minerals. These can lead to serious ecological crises that are difficult to foresee.

Economic security lies in the impact that genetically modified crops may have on the agricultural economy, the agro-processing industry, and the manufacturing industry that depends on crops. For example, after the large-scale dependence on genetically modified crops, the global or regional industrial transfer, the first system change, and the supporting industry change will occur; Large-scale production gaps due to the loss of traditional seed production capacity in the breeding industry after the discovery of crop problems; The cost of planting has gradually increased after the transgenic technology was controlled by international giants.

All of the above, hanging one leak.

Therefore, the safety of genetically modified crops is a strategic topic that should be studied from a multidisciplinary perspective. The research of agronomists is only a small part of it.

Of course, at present, if it is a genetically modified crop product that has been approved by the state, it can basically be assured of the safety of cooking and eating. At least you won't have a genetic change as a result of eating a cooked meal.

If you are concerned about whether the state has carefully assessed the overall safety of the crop, you can of course express your concern and resist it with purchases.

My opinion:

Officially approved GM cultivation of certain crops, but only in the experimental stage;

We can't be guinea pigs, we can't eat it, try not to eat it.