-
A monk carries water to eat, 1 1 2 3, 2 monks carry water to eat, 2 11 monks have no water to eat, so the math problem (1 11 2) one (2 1 1) o. Revelation: No matter what you do, three will not work, you must compete with others.
Cooperative learning is a kind of collective learning behavior, which requires students to have a corresponding sense of teamwork, and in order to successfully carry out cooperative learning, it is necessary to establish a good sense of division of labor and cooperation. There is such an old story: "One monk carries water to drink, two monks carry water to drink, and three monks have no water to drink."
This story illustrates the importance of division of labor and cooperation.
Therefore, in specific teaching, teachers should pay attention to creating a good cooperative learning atmosphere, provide students with sufficient time for communication, design effective mathematical problems, guide students to think independently, cooperate, and discuss together, and cultivate a good sense of cooperation in cooperative learning practice and experience the fun of cooperative learning.
For example, when teaching "Know Objects", you can design it this way: give each group a bag containing a cube, a cuboid, a sphere, and a cylinder, and ask one student to find the correct object from the bag according to the other students' requirements.
-
The condition should be wrong, pour 5 barrels and 8 barrels should have a weight difference, use the weight after pouring 8 barrels to subtract the weight after pouring 5 barrels to get the weight of 3 barrels of water, so that the weight of a bucket of water can be obtained, so that the weight of a bucket of water obtained can be substituted into the weight of 5 buckets of water with the weight of the cylinder can get the weight of the cylinder.
-
A bucket of water weighs 65 kg, 65x5 = 320 kg, so the water tank weighs 10 kg, hehe, guess.
-
I always feel like a disadvantage.
-
The story of the three monks who have no water to drink not only criticizes the backward thinking that "the three monks have no water to eat", but also advocates the new social trend of "the hearts of the people are united, Mount Tai moves", which is closely linked with real life.
A monk carries water to eat, two monks carry water to eat, three monks have no water to eat" folk proverb from ancient times to the present, almost everyone knows that there are many things that cannot be done in our lives, often the "three monks" are not in line with each other.
These three sentences are simple, but they have a deep philosophical meaning. This has been the case, it is true today, and it will continue to be the case in the future.
-
The road is one foot high, and the magic is one foot high!
-
The words of the ancients have been passed down to this day, and they are very philosophical.
-
I don't think so, just be yourself, as long as you are happy with your efforts, and don't live so tired.
-
The story of the three monks who have no water to drink not only criticizes the backward thinking that "the three monks have no water to eat", but also advocates the new social trend of "the hearts of the people are united, Mount Tai moves", which is closely linked with real life.
A monk carries water to eat, two monks carry water to eat, three monks have no water to eat" folk proverb from ancient times to the present, almost everyone knows that there are many things that cannot be done in our lives, often the "three monks" are not in line with each other.
These three sentences are simple, but they have a deep philosophical meaning. This has been the case, it is true today, and it will continue to be the case in the future.
-
One monk carries water to drink, bai two monks carry water to drink, three.
Zhi monk has no water to drink, dao This is a fable, and its moral is: do one thing, belong.
If there is no system as a guarantee, the responsibility is not implemented, and there are too many people to do it Why don't the three monks have water to drink? Because the three monks belong to the same mentality and the same ideological realm, they don't want to contribute, they want to rely on others, and they pass the buck to each other on the issue of taking water, and as a result, no one goes to get water, so that everyone has no water to drink Actually, the three monks can also have water to drink, as long as they organize a little and set up a system of taking turns to take water, the responsibility will be put on the person, and the violator will be severely punished, so that there will be water to drink
-
It's the distribution of life, one person has no choice, can only go to carry water, two people either take turns, why just I do this hard and tiring work, you chant at home, no matter what, you have to pull one into the water, three monks will be in trouble, a burden is carried by two people at most, there is always one who is idle and painful, the story does not say that let the three of them rotate positions, no matter who two of the three of them go, they can't get used to the one who is idle and has nothing to do, so everyone endures it, don't go, I don't want to be the cannon fodder.
-
Human nature is selfish, and it is common to enjoy leisure and dislike work. in people.
The source system is incomplete.
In the case that the scope of responsibility is not implemented, people are floating in a state where no one wants to do things.
In addition, there is no one who does not suffer from widowhood, but suffers from the mentality of unevenness, no one wants to do more, and wants to sit back and enjoy the results, when one person is the beneficiary is no problem, if the division of labor is uneven when two people, some people will feel that they are at a loss, and when there are three people, there will be at least one small group of gangs, so there are constant disputes, and it is difficult to do many things.
-
A bucket of water needs to be carried by 2 monks, and the 3 monks have to carry the bucket of water back to the temple from a distance of 450 meters from the bottom of the mountain, with an average of 300 meters per monk.
300 (m).
The nature of division operations.
The dividend expands (shrinks) n times, and the divisor does not change, and the quotient expands (shrinks) n times accordingly.
The divisor expands (shrinks) n times, and the dividend remains unchanged, and the quotient shrinks (expands) n times accordingly.
The dividend, divided by two divisors consecutively, is equal to the product of the two divisors. Sometimes simple operations can be performed depending on the nature of division. For example: 300 25 4 = 300 (25 4) divided by a number = the reciprocal of this number.
-
450 3 = m for one person, ab ac bc, one person, two distances, 150 2 = 300 for one person to carry 300 meters.
-
300 (m).If the three monks are A, B, C, then there are AB, AC, BC, three ways, each 150 meters, then each 300 meters.
-
The fastest way is to solve the equation: there are x monks, and according to the meaning of the question, the equation is obtained: x 2+x 3=80 solution: so, there are 96 monks.
The slow way is to:
We can solve this problem by analyzing the information in the question.
According to the question, we can get two conditions:
Two monks share a bowl of rice.
Three monks share a bowl of soup.
Now we can deduce how many monks there are based on these conditions.
First of all, we can get through the first condition, the number of rice bowls that each and the scrambled sales Chashang gets is:
Then, we can get through the second condition, the number of soup bowls allocated to each monk is:
Finally, we can add up the two conditions to get the total number of bowls required by each monk is:
Now we can count how many monks there are based on the total number of bowls used (80 given in the title).
Therefore, the answer is 96 monks.
-
Summary. Column: 600x2 3=400 meters.
A bucket of water needs to be carried by two little monks and friends. 3 little monks have to carry a bucket of water from a distance of 600 meters back to the temple chaolaoli, how much does each little monk have to carry on average? Uproar.
Column: 600x2 3=400 meters.
On average, each little monk has to carry 400 meters.
Because nine more people drank the water at once.
Materialist dialectics holds that everything has two aspects, its whole and its parts. The whole and the part are strictly distinct, but they also influence each other, restrict each other, and are inseparable. >>>More
Harvard University did an experiment at a middle school in the United States, where three people put a small ball tied with a thin wire in each person's hand into a bottle the size of a small ball. To fill the bottle with water, the three balls must be removed before they can be filled with water. Many groups of students participated in the experiment, but failed each time. >>>More
Drinking water before going to bed can reduce the consistency of blood in the blood vessels, but not in excess, which will cause a burden on the body's heart and kidneys.
1. Wrong, the quotient remains unchanged, but the remainder expands by the same multiple, in addition, the meaning of decimal division is not the same as the meaning of integer division, and the remainder division will not be used. >>>More