Can philosophy explain all the problems of life?

It should be said that philosophy tries to explain all the problems of life.

All attempts to solve problems, especially repeated reflections, are a philosophical way of thinking, of course, which has to do with the definition of philosophy, a bit like circular argumentation? But it's also a philosophical way of thinking, hehe.

When some knowledge acquires its own unique scope, such as logic, astronomy, mathematics, psychology, and so on, they are separated from philosophy, so it should be said that philosophy, the great mother of all knowledge, has left itself only the most difficult problems for human beings to solve.

So it should be said that philosophy tries to help us solve all the great questions of life, not only to explain and understand, but also to find a way out of life......

Philosophy can make people wise, but philosophy can also make people sophistry.

Philosophy can solve all the problems of life, but the specific way and method of implementation is determined by one's own actions and thoughts. It is still necessary to unify the objective and subjective to deal with and solve the things in life.

1.The question of what is the primacy of thinking and being. The difference in this question is the only criterion for distinguishing materialism from idealism.

2.The question of whether there is an identity between thinking and existence, that is, whether thinking can correctly recognize existing problems.

The problem of the relationship between thinking and existence is the basic problem that people first encounter and cannot avoid in their life and practical activities.

The activities engaged in by human beings mainly boil down to two categories, one is to understand the world, and the other is to transform the world. However, whether we understand the world or transform the world, in the final analysis, we must solve a common problem, that is, the problem of the relationship between thinking and existence.

The question of the relationship between thinking and existence is a question that cannot be avoided and necessary by all philosophies. It runs through the whole development of philosophy, and the difference in this issue determines the basic nature and direction of various philosophies, and determines the treatment of other philosophical issues.

The basis of the world is matter, and in tens of billions or even hundreds of billions of years ago, consciousness did not exist, because consciousness is exclusive to human beings, and it is the continuous progress of the material world and the continuous evolution of human beings that produce consciousness.

All our knowledge and experience of matter is in our consciousness, and this knowledge and experience is also part of our mind. So there is no way to conclusively prove that matter exists, and that the laws of physics are correct. Because the source of all this is our consciousness, therefore, taking one's own consciousness as evidence may be wrong on the one hand, and one-sided on the other; The former emphasizes that our experience itself may be hallucinatory, while the latter emphasizes the non-deductive nature of inductive reasoning, and even if we correctly reflect objective facts every time we make observations, we can also arrive at wrong conclusions because consciousness is subjective.

My answer is yes, we have made many assumptions about science for hundreds of years, and with the progress of science, our assumptions about science have been proven one by one, and some of them are correct, so it can be seen that consciousness and existence have their sameness.

Of course, there are many great thinkers who believe that the mind is not capable of correctly understanding existence. It is agnostic.

Is there such a friend, I always can't help but buy and buy as soon as I go shopping, and I end up buying a bunch of things that I don't actually need, what should I do?

In addition to this confusion, there are actually many other puzzles in our lives, such as important decisions about life, such as what kind of job to choose, how to pursue the other half of the heart, and so on.

These big and small things in life, if there is the blessing of philosophy, will be clearer when making choices. The fundamental solution to these problems is to be reasonable.

We live our whole lives, and we are always making decisions with ourselves and with others.

When making decisions with yourself, you need a set of reasonable methods to convince yourself, and you need to be reasonable when making decisions with others.

What do philosophers mean when they say that "man is a thinking reed"? If you think about it, reeds are very small and fragile, but in fact, people are also very fragile like reeds, we are not as strong and agile as lions and cheetahs, nor are we as strong as hippos and elephants have strong bodies as our protection.

However, our human strength is that we can think and reason, so we can overcome our physical vulnerability.

There are actually some core contents that make philosophy useful in life and solve problems. and the underlying logic. For example, first, in daily life, how do we judge whether a decision is justified or not?

Second, people are often irrational, and when they are irrational, how can we be reasonable?

In fact, in my opinion, to measure whether a thing has the support of reason, it is actually very simple, you just look at whether it conforms to the principle of logic, semantics and experience.

Studying "The Philosophy of Use" is the key to unlocking this question, let's study together.

1 Meaning of Fundamental Questions in Philosophy.

The basic problem of philosophy is the question of the relationship between thinking and being, or the relationship between consciousness and matter. It consists of two aspects: first, what is the primacy of mind and being, consciousness and matter; The second question is whether mind and being, consciousness and matter are identical.

The different answers to the first aspect of the fundamental question of philosophy constitute the opposition between materialism and idealism. Materialism asserts that existence determines thinking, and matter determines consciousness; Idealism asserts that thinking determines existence and consciousness determines matter. Different answers to the second aspect of the fundamental question of philosophy constitute the opposition between agnosticism and agnosticism.

Agnosticism asserts that mind and being, consciousness and matter are identical; Agnosticism denies that mind and being, consciousness and matter are identical.

3 The relationship between the two aspects of the fundamental problems of philosophy.

The two aspects of the fundamental questions of philosophy are interrelated, of which the first is the main one.

4 The question of the relationship between matter and consciousness is the reason why it is a fundamental question of philosophy.

Matter and consciousness, as philosophical categories, are the highest generalizations of the two major categories of phenomena in the world: material phenomena and spiritual phenomena. The study of the relationship between these two types of phenomena is the most important question of the worldview. This is a question that no philosophical school of thought can avoid.

The question of the relationship between matter and consciousness reveals the fundamental contradictions of human practice. All human activities include nothing more than two basic aspects: understanding the world and transforming the world, both of which are essentially issues of the relationship between matter and consciousness. Therefore, the different answers to the question of which matter and consciousness are the first nature become the fundamental question in all practical work of man.

Where does life come from, where does death go, and what is the meaning of life?

(a).

The basic problem is the relationship between thinking and being.

The two basic contents are: first, what is the primacy of matter and spirit, and who is the origin of the world. Second, there is the question of whether there is an identity between thinking and existence or between things and consciousness, that is, whether people's minds can understand the real world.

Second, the relationship between thinking and existence is the most basic problem in human social activities. Third:

The Fundamental Question of Philosophy: What is the primacy of thinking and being? The belief that thinking determines existence is idealism, such as the view that "I think, therefore I am"; It is materialism that believes that existence determines thinking, such as "practice is the only criterion for testing truth".

The basic problem of philosophy is the question of the relationship between thinking and being, specifically there are two aspects, one is what is the principle of thinking and being... The second is the primacy of thinking and existence. Let's get right to the point...

(1) The basic problem of philosophy is the relationship between thinking and existence, or the relationship between spirit and matter, consciousness and matter.

2) The basic questions of philosophy have two aspects of content (the basic questions of philosophy include two aspects of the problem):

First, it is a question of which is the primacy of mind and existence, of spirit and matter, and of which is primordial. The different answers to this question are the only criterion that distinguishes the two basic schools of philosophy, materialism and idealism.

Anyone who believes that matter determines spirit (material first, spirit second), is materialism;

Anyone who believes that spirit determines matter (spirit first, material second) is idealism.

The second aspect is whether thinking and being, spirit and matter are identical, that is, whether human consciousness can correctly understand the real world. The different answers to this question are the criteria for dividing agnosticism from agnosticism.

Agnosticism is the belief that people are able to perceive the real world correctly; Agnosticism is the belief that it is impossible for people to know the real world.

Talking about the basic problems of philosophy, in fact, it is the relationship between thinking and existence, and the relationship between matter and consciousness.

1. Content. The fundamental problem of philosophy is the question of the relationship between thinking and being, spirit and matter. It consists of two main aspects:

The first aspect is the question of who decides whom, material and spiritual.

The second aspect is the question of whether the spirit can understand matter.

2. Significance. 1. The difference between the first aspect is the fundamental criterion for dividing materialism and idealism.

Anyone who believes that matter determines spirit (material first, spirit second), is materialism;

Anyone who believes that spirit determines matter (spirit first, material second) is idealism.

2. The difference between the second aspect is the fundamental criterion for distinguishing between agnosticism and agnosticism.

Anyone who believes that people can correctly understand the real world is an agnosticist;

Anyone who thinks that people cannot know the real world or cannot know the real world thoroughly is agnostic.

The basic problem of philosophy is the question of the relationship between thinking and being. It includes two aspects: first, the question of who is the essence of the world between consciousness and matter, spirit and nature, that is, the question of which is the first nature and what is the second nature; Second, whether the mind can recognize or correctly recognize the existing problems.

The main contents of philosophy include the following aspects: materialism, dialectics, and epistemology.

The main contents of materialism: the dialectical relationship between matter and consciousness, the regularity of material movement;

The main contents of dialectics: the point of view, the point of view, the point of view, the point of contradiction;

The main contents of epistemology: phenomena and essences, practical perspectives.

The basic problem of philosophy is the relationship between thinking and existence, which includes two aspects, on the one hand, what is the origin of the world between thinking and existence, and on the other hand, the question of whether thinking and existence are identical. The answer to question 1 is the basis for dividing materialism and idealism, and the answer to question 2 is the basis for dividing agnosticism and agnosticism.