It seems that there are many scientists who firmly believe in this God

In fact, God created all things, and human science is nothing but a reflection and understanding of all things. Like, you see something in the mirror, but you can't deny that the thing in the mirror was not created. Science is the mirror.

The doctrine of scientists does not state that God does not exist, on the contrary, it does explain the power of God.

Poke in: Thought is mainly composed of IQ and emotional intelligence, faith guides our emotions, whether it is happy or sad, we will not be lost, and faith allows us to have a strong will spirit. (Faith:.)

The ultimate goal of our life's pursuit, it can be one thing and one thing) Faith is the driving force of our emotions, and science is the objective and practical truth. Newton was obsessed with science, and I think his belief was to break through the unknown. Newton's later theological studies and abandonment of science may be that the unknown world is too big, there are too many unknowns for him to break through, so his faith is shattered and changed.

Theology became his spiritual sustenance, his new faith, don't be ironic, I'm just an ordinary person.

God is everything. Everything is God.

Copernicus, Albert Einstein.

Edison, Galileo, etc.

92% of the world's famous scientists believe in God. Believe in Jesus. Believe in God. For example, physicist Isaac Newton, astronomer Copernicus, and Albert Einstein, the father of the atomic bomb; The great inventor Thomas Edison once said, "I found Jesus to be the Savior of mankind."

If we believe in science, why can't we trust God?

We don't believe in science. Science is a process of approaching objective truth. On the other hand, the claim that God is a thing or supernatural has absolutely no objective evidence.

We should embrace science, because the scientific theories derived from it allow ** to actually come true, which are confirmed by Dancha, and implicitly confirmed by science itself. God does not allow such **. People try to make ** according to God and the Bible, but strangely they don't come true.

Science delivers results. Therefore, it is reasonable to accept the science. On the other hand, God ......

If science is a matter of proving something, should we eliminate what we can't prove yet?

Science is not about proving things. Science simply cannot prove any theory. Theories can only be falsified or confirmed again and again, but never proven. So the idea doesn't make sense.

The problem with the God hypothesis is that it is inherently unscientific because it is unfalsifiable. Offering an experiment that, in case of failure, would falsify the claim that God exists, I'm sure scientists would be happy to carry it out. Since you probably can't do it, science won't bother with God's hypothesis.

Therefore, it has not even been eliminated or even considered scientifically.

The unknown world is timed, the universe is truly boundless, time and space are the universe, absolute time is irreversible, but I don't think the multidimensional world should exist naturally. I just don't know if the online world built with servers is a crippled world, and if so, whether it is possible to build a virtual but real intelligent world with a kind of cornerstone.

Scientists will study a lot of unknown phenomena, study these unknown phenomena, in order to get unknown conclusions, this is the meaning of scientific progress, because scientific knowledge continues to overturn the conclusions of predecessors, to create a new knowledge system, the macrocosm, the microcosm of the two aspects of research, whether it is physics or other aspects of research, are needed to explore the unknown field, these unknown areas to explore the mysterious phenomena, so that people have no way to explain,Even these great scientists have no way to explain it, so they choose to believe in theology, but we want to recognize the meaning of science science isConstantly knowing the unknown, getting known.

The continent of science is still very large, and what we know now is just some leftovers, and we may not really touch the real science, because the history of human development is too short, and the development of science and technology from the present is only a few hundred yearsThe earth existsHundreds of millions of years, how can it be possible for people to explore and understand it in hundreds of years, there is still a long way to go.

Religion is actually a "metaphysics", and believing in God does not mean that scientists are superstitious about the existence of God, but that people may always have some kind of spiritual support, so that they can hold on when they are confused and helpless, and God is his pillar.

This has something to do with one's own beliefs, and it is not only ordinary people who have faith, even highly educated scientists have the right to choose their own beliefs.

Because the end of science is endlessly pointing to the inexplicable, if everything can be calculated, then the future of mankind will also become predictable, and life will be doomed.