Should I be legally responsible for such an act Please help

Supplement: For the compensation for land requisition, if it belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife, it can be half of the compensation for one person at the time of divorce. However, this is not necessarily the case for the compensation for the house, if the house is not your father's personal property, but was purchased after marriage, or if it was purchased jointly by your mother and father before the marriage, then at the time of divorce, half of the compensation can be given to your mother; If the house is your father's pre-marital property, then the compensation is your father's property, and your mother does not get it.

However, according to the law, if the man commits bigamy, cohabitation with another person, etc., the woman must be compensated at the time of divorce, and the compensation includes material damages and moral damages, which are determined according to the injuries suffered by your mother. So, the question now is, depending on whether your parents are willing to divorce or not, if you really want to divorce, then divide the property according to the above method and ask your father to compensate. If you don't get divorced, then you can use this compensation to buy a new house.

If you are able to do so, it is best to hire a lawyer to fight this lawsuit, which is more conducive to protecting your interests.

If you have any other questions, please add them and good luck.

1. The father's behavior has constituted the crime of bigamy, and if his lawful wife wants to hold him responsible, she can go to the court to file a criminal lawsuit and ask the court to judge the other party to bear criminal responsibility. If the unlawful wife knows that the father has a wife, but still lives with him, then the woman is also guilty of bigamy and can also be held criminally liable. But if she didn't know it, it wouldn't be guilty of bigamy.

2. After the father comes back, do not file a divorce lawsuit, and after the father bears criminal responsibility and goes to prison, then receive land requisition compensation in the name of the father, and use the compensation to maintain the life of the mother and daughter.

It is advisable to consult with a local lawyer regarding the receipt of compensation, and if you have any other questions, please ask additional questions and good luck.

According to the provisions of the Marriage Law, if one party divorces due to an extramarital affair, the party receives a small or no share of the joint property of the husband and wife. The previous alimony cannot be returned, because alimony is of a personal nature and cannot be pursued forward.

If your mother wants, you can report it to the police station and say that your father has bigamy. But there must be evidence that your father and the other woman are living as husband and wife.

Your conduct is an insurance fraud, and the amount of fraud exceeds 1,000 yuan, which has constituted a relatively large amount, and constitutes a crime You may be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or short-term detention in accordance with law, and a fine of not less than 10,000 yuan but not more than 100,000 yuan

If the thief has already started the theft (entering your house and looking for belongings) or has already stolen something, it depends on how violent the thief is against your dad. If the thieves are violent enough to suppress your father's resistance, the crime of theft is transformed into robbery, which can be defended infinitely and hacked to death without criminal liability. If the thieves' violence is not enough to suppress your father's resistance, it does not translate into robbery, and hacking to death constitutes excessive defense and is criminally responsible.

If the thief has not yet started to commit the crime, he is discovered as soon as he enters the door, and he does not subjectively have the criminal intent to rob, but only uses violence to escape, because he is in the preparatory stage of the crime of theft, it cannot be converted into the crime of robbery, and hacking to death constitutes excessive defense and is subject to criminal responsibility. If the thief uses violence not to escape, but subjectively changes from the criminal intent of theft to robbery (robbery if he can't steal), it constitutes the crime of robbery, can be defended indefinitely, and hacking to death does not bear criminal responsibility.

Anyway, in a word, violent robbery and hacking to death are not responsible. ￥

Committing the crime of theft, using violence or threatening violence on the spot in order to conceal dirt, resist arrest or destroy criminal evidence, is converted into the crime of robbery.

I accidentally said so much, so tired. Let's be more specific about the problem in the future.

No, you're in self-defense, not responsible. But it's better to call the police and have the police deal with it.

It depends on how much the thief beat your father at that time, and whether it will endanger your father's life. If it is endangered, then it is also legitimate defense for you to hack someone to death, otherwise it may be excessive defense. In short, it depends on the specific situation at the time.

The thief who was caught in the course of the theft and then assaulted your father has constituted a transformative robbery, and your actions are justified and you are not criminally liable.

Your actions are justified and you are not criminally liable.

5 people beat your father, which has seriously endangered your personal safety. It shouldn't be overly defensive... Even if it is excessive defense, the punishment is lenient.

If it's not caused by the device, it's a pure accident, then your second landlord is responsible. Because he is in charge of hygiene. Now there is also the question, is the second landlord renting the house to you with the landlord's consent?

If not, then the landlord is looking for a second landlord to recover. (Regardless of who is responsible) because the second landlord is the tenant. Of course, if it is agreed by the landlord, the responsibility is also the second landlord, because he neglected to perform his hygiene duties and caused the fire of the range hood and caused losses.

Anyway, you better leave as soon as possible, because this kind of thing is unclear, you must not pay any loss fees or the like yourself, you can never recover after the advance, and the landlord must insist on finding the second landlord to talk about compensation. Even if you find someone, you have to insist that you are innocent, and don't carry the black pot yourself with the idea of settling things and calming people.

Responsibility is due to inadvertent cause of fire, the consequence of the fire is only the loss of the kitchen, there is no legal responsibility, compensation can be negotiated, generally speaking, only need to pay for the damaged items in the kitchen and some non-material losses (such as construction, decoration costs).

The fire was caused by your negligence, and you are directly responsible and should bear the main responsibility. The landlord is at fault for failing to fulfill the obligation to clean the range hood as agreed in the contract, and should bear secondary liability. Now the new electrical appliances are not expensive, and an old range hood is not worth much, so it is recommended to negotiate a solution.

Everything is carried out in accordance with contracts and contracts.

The primary responsibility rests with the secondary landlord.

From what you said, the fire is mainly caused by the grease in the range hood, and the oil star is common and unavoidable when stir-frying. After the second landlord collects the sanitation fee, it is reasonable to clean it regularly.

In addition, you, as a resident, have a duty of due care for the premises and are secondarily liable for the damage caused by the fire.

Hello and glad for you.

First, under normal circumstances, if she commits suicide, you are not legally responsible; But if you are present at the time of the suicide and do not dissuade or provide assistance (e.g. call 120), then you may be held criminally liable.

Second, there is no legal requirement for the man to pay for the abortion and nutrition expenses. But as a man, there may be a certain moral condemnation.

Third, if there is an accident during the abortion, whether you have to bear it depends on the situation. For example, if it is a medical accident, then you do not have to bear it, if you have an accident on the way to send her to an abortion, you may need to be held responsible, in short, you cannot generalize.

Fourth, whether the child is born in or out of wedlock, as the biological father of the child, you have an obligation to take responsibility. Generally, the newborn baby will be awarded to the woman for the sake of the baby, and you will need to pay child support.

1.No responsibility, as the case may be.

2.Moral compensation should be given, it will not be much.

3.No, you don't.

4.It depends on who the child is given to, and the other parent has to give child support.

1. You will not be prosecuted for her suicide, but morality and morality will not allow you to do so.

2. Compensation is necessary, both legally and morally.

3. In the event of an accident, if the situation depends, responsibility is inevitable.

4. The rights and obligations of illegitimate children and legitimate children are the same, and child support is unavoidable. It doesn't matter if you're married or not. The child is yours, and the blood relationship cannot be broken, and the tube cannot be broken. Your marriage and divorce have nothing to do with your children, and you should fulfill your obligations.

"You don't know", this is difficult to prove.

I don't know if I don't know beforehand

The key to this matter is what kind of contract do you sign with the renovation workers?

1. Employment contract: then there is an employment relationship between you, he is an employee, and the consequences of his actions are borne by you. That is, you have to bear the losses of other owners;

2. Contract: that is, you deliver the air conditioner to him according to the whole thing, and all the consequences shall be borne by him.

I was asked if I had a sales relationship with him, he sold me an air conditioner, and he was responsible for the installation at the same time

Then you belong to the contracting relationship, and he should be held responsible. You can tell other owners about his situation and let them come to him directly!

There is a direct causal relationship between your neighbor's inability to use electricity and your renovation behavior. The loss of the neighbor shall be borne jointly by you and Panasonic. You can recover from Panasonic after you bear it.

I think this incident should actually be the responsibility of Panasonic air conditioner, because the relationship between you and Panasonic is a business relationship, and Panasonic asks someone to help you install the air conditioner, so Panasonic and the worker may have an employment or contract relationship before, but it has nothing to do with you, so it should be the responsibility of Panasonic or the worker anyway. However, because you install the air conditioner and cause the cable damage of the upstairs user, this should also involve the adjacency, that is, you cannot damage the normal interests of the upstairs residents when installing the air conditioner, so you should first compensate or repair the upstairs, and then find Panasonic to claim.

According to Article 8 of the Contract Law, a contract established in accordance with the law is legally binding on the parties. The parties shall perform their obligations in accordance with the agreement and shall not modify or terminate the contract without authorization.

Contracts established in accordance with the law are protected by law.

Article 142:The risk of damage to or loss of the subject matter shall be borne by the seller before the delivery of the subject matter, and by the buyer after delivery, except as otherwise provided by law or otherwise agreed by the parties.

Since you have paid the full amount of the money to the seller, you are responsible for what happens next. (Unless otherwise specified).

First of all, affirm that you are responsible, but there are different distinctions of responsibility, such as primary liability, secondary liability, joint and several liability, and so on. For such a thing, it is recommended that you communicate with the merchant, and if the communication fails, you can choose to complain to the industrial and commercial authorities or go to the court to sue.

It is primarily the responsibility of the employer. i.e. Panasonic air conditioner.

Because you have an air conditioner in your home, you have an obligation to remind and notify. It depends on the situation, the cable local comprehensive analysis... Affirmation Panasonic bears the main responsibility... You may have a little bit of responsibility.

Panasonic can be held responsible.