Are we legally responsible? Urgent!!!

a The act is intentional wounding resulting in serious bodily injury under the Penal Code

Article 292:Those who assemble a crowd to fight are to be positive against the ringleaders and others.

those who participate are sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release; There are the following circumstances.

In the case of one of them, the number one is not less than three years and ten years for the ringleaders and others who actively participate.

Imprisonment for up to one year:

1) Gathering crowds to fight multiple times;

2) Gathering a crowd to brawl with a large number of people, a large scale, and a vile social impact;

3) Gathering crowds to fight in public places or on major transportation routes, causing a public cause.

Serious disorder;

4) Armed crowds to fight.

Where a crowd is assembled to fight, causing serious injury or death, follow article 230 of this Law.

Article 4 and Article 232 provide for conviction and punishment.

Article 234:Whoever intentionally harms the body of another person is to be sentenced to up to three years.

fixed-term imprisonment, criminal detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph and causes serious injury to another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

Punishment; Causing death or serious bodily injury by particularly cruel means, resulting in serious disability.

shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment or death. This Act is otherwise.

where provided, follow the provisions.

Depending on the circumstances of the offence of A, a sentence of 5 or 7 years may be imposed.

People who go with you and don't participate in the brawl don't need to, but as long as there is a public security bureau that participates, it will generally give an administrative penalty, so don't worry if you don't participate.

l's medical expenses should be borne by the person who beat him, as for the medical expenses you helped, there is no legal basis, if you want to help your friend, there is nothing to say, you can ask him to repay.

A's family's demand is purely unreasonable, you don't need to pay any compensation to A, you can tell A's family that A's behavior is not necessarily related to you, and that there is no causal relationship between the illegal act he committed and you.

Your situation seems to be more serious, I recommend that you consult a lawyer, and their professional advice I think is more conducive to helping you solve the problem. The consultation fee should not be expensive.

Assume responsibility for the legal provisions involved.

Legal acts must bear legal responsibility, and illegal acts must bear illegal responsibility. In other words, if a citizen or legal person violates the law by acting, he or she must bear the responsibility for the illegal act, which is "corresponding responsibility".

For example, in the case of joint and several liability for the sale and purchase of assembled and scrapped motor vehicles, the joint and several liability here is the corresponding liability.

Article 51 of the Tort Liability Law stipulates that if a motor vehicle is assembled or has reached the scrapping standard is transferred by way of sale or sale, and the damage caused by a traffic accident occurs, the transferor and the transferee shall be jointly and severally liable.

The law is the regulation of rights and obligations. Violation of the law entails liability for violating that law.

Corresponding to this, appropriate meaning.

This has to be analysed in specific situations, such as in a partnership, where partners have responsibilities and obligations for reporting, loyalty, non-compete, and non-transaction!

Liability is a special obligation to compensate, enforce or accept punishment for damage arising from specific legal facts, that is, a secondary obligation arising from the breach of a primary obligation.

Your conduct is an insurance fraud, and the amount of fraud exceeds 1,000 yuan, which has constituted a relatively large amount, and constitutes a crime You may be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or short-term detention in accordance with law, and a fine of not less than 10,000 yuan but not more than 100,000 yuan

First of all, the documents signed by your father should belong to some formalities when setting up a factory, such as the registration of promoters and shareholders, etc., that is, your father is only a nominal investor in the factory, and has not actually participated in the investment and operation, let alone actually benefited, and from a legal point of view, it belongs to the nominal investor;

Secondly, since the liability of the enterprise should be borne by the shareholders and investors, and if your father is an investor registered with the industry and commerce, from the perspective of legal publicity, the public should recognize that the factory belongs to your father, but in fact your father is not the actual shareholder and has not participated in the operation and management of the factory, so in general, the risk is very high;

Thirdly, generally speaking, local factories are private enterprises with unlimited liability, and if the factory bears huge debts, it can only be traced back to the registered investor in law;

Finally, if you want to know what documents your father signed, you can directly ask for a copy, or go directly to the local industrial and commercial office to inquire about it.

The above is an analysis of the relevant legal liabilities and legal risks, in this regard, it is recommended as follows:

1. What kind of legal documents and procedures should be signed by your father first, so as to clearly judge what kind of risks and potential legal liabilities exist;

2. Now that you have signed it, you should let your father understand what kind of legal act this is and what legal consequences it may produce on the basis of respecting and straightening out the relationship, and only with your father's understanding and support can you do things well;

3. If those documents belong to the nominal investment procedures for the establishment of the factory, you should persuade your father to request to change or replace them as soon as possible;

4. As for the issue of the report letter you mentioned, since the actual registration is not your relative, it is difficult to explain the problem directly, and this will stiffen the relationship, embarrass your father, and may cause greater misunderstanding;

5. Of course, the above are the worst legal consequences pointed out by a so-called lawyer (in fact, you have thought of them all), and many nominal enterprises are operating normally without much problem. But just in case, you should still actively deal with it properly;

6. If the consent of all parties is obtained, the relevant procedures for change can be re-signed and submitted, which can be completed soon, and the specific information should be consulted with the Industrial and Commercial Bureau.

Village cadres are not state functionaries, and it should be said that there is no problem for individuals to become shareholders and run enterprises. Your relatives may just feel bad about the impact.

If you start a limited liability company, you will only be liable for the amount of capital contribution, and there will be no bankruptcy.

If it's not ****, your relatives have smashed all the money into it, what are you afraid of.

If it is profitable, your father will burn high incense if he does not come to fight with each other.

So, it should be your relatives who are worried, not you.

Hello! As far as what you're talking about, there's nothing big of a problem. As long as you don't let your family pay.

It's also very important to really find out what he did with your father's ID, which your father should know very well. If you use your ID card to apply for a loan and mortgage something, it is not good. If it's really a shareholding, of course, it's good, and your family can bite back when paying dividends, after all, your father is the real shareholder!

Finally, if he really has concerns, he asks his father to find him to sign an agreement or statement, which indicates that he borrowed his ID card and asks someone else to sign and witness it, just in case. As long as the other party is not deceiving people, there should be no big problem. I wish you a happy family!

It is true that state servants are not allowed to participate in any other profit-making investments and other legal provisions, which you can refer to the Civil Servants Act

That's right, if something goes wrong with the factory, your father is responsible, and your relative's agreement with your father is illegal, and I suggest that if something goes wrong in the future, you can sue for invalidating the contract.

Of course, the premise is that there is a written agreement between your father and him, and then gather evidence to prove that your relative is the actual person in charge of the factory.

Good luck!!

It depends on the nature of the enterprise they are starting, and the most feared thing is that they are opening a partnership enterprise, and the partners of an ordinary partnership enterprise are subject to unlimited joint and several liability, and if the enterprise goes bankrupt, the partners must repay the debts of the partnership with their personal property.

It's best to check it out, and if it's a partnership, it's better to quit as soon as possible.

The key is what you did with your father's ID card, if it is a loan or a guarantee, there will be trouble, of course, your father's signature is also required, I think your father will also see it clearly before signing. If you really go to run a business, there is only one form of business that will be risky, sole proprietorship (one-person company), it seems to be this name, you can consult the local industry and commerce, this form of company will bear unlimited liability, unlike a limited liability company, personal assets will be affected. You can consult the industry and commerce for what kind of business form, anyway, this business form only began to exist a few years ago, and the industry and commerce must know.

Criminally: You are in a romantic relationship, you did not intend to harm her intentionally or negligently, and you are not criminally responsible.

The constitutive elements of a general tort include: the existence of the harmful act, the existence of the harmful act, the causal relationship between the harmful act and the harmful fact, and the subjective fault of the perpetrator. First of all, you are not doing any wrongdoing.

Second, in terms of causality, the real reason for her infertility may be the improper operation of the operation. In the end, you are not subjectively at fault. If she can't sue for infringement, what else can she sue for?

If you insist on saying that the person in charge, just buy some fruit and take a look, after all, we have loved each other.

Personal thoughts.

No, but the cause of the pathology is very complicated, and it is impossible for birth control pills or abortion alone to cause such consequences, and she just goes to court to sue you, and the court will dismiss the lawsuit, don't worry, it won't be filed.

Hello, if both parties are consensual, your actions are not in violation of the law, and you should also pay attention to the age of the woman, if you are under the age of 14, you may be in violation of the Criminal Code.

Hope it helps!

Beijing Inheritance Expert Team].

Since the consequences of certain actions in a relationship are completely foreseeable, the person concerned is solely responsible for the corresponding consequences.

And birth control pills can cause infertility, it's basic common sense.

Your actions do not constitute a crime, and the other party will not be able to sue you for support, but you should give some moral comfort.

In this case, there is no legal responsibility.

1. It is difficult for the other party to prove that there is a causal relationship between the occurrence of breast tumors and the taking of contraceptives.

2. The act of carrying out ** and taking contraceptive pills are all taken by the woman, and as a person with full civil capacity, she needs to take responsibility for her own actions.

It's hard to hold you legally accountable

I don't understand whether it is related to having a birth control pill and having a breast tumor in medicine, but from a legal point of view, your ex-girlfriend has no direct evidence and is legally untenable.

Don't worry about this, the thief's words are just one-sided, and now the police have to pay attention to evidence when they say anything, and it is impossible to sentence your father to death because of the thief's words.

First of all, whether the store opened by your father has the qualifications of ****, if so, then there is no problem, the police have no evidence to prove that you put the transaction with the thief in the necklace, and only the thief's confession cannot be identified. If you do not have the qualifications to trade without ** or ** transaction qualifications, it will generally be treated as a public security violation, a fine or a residence.

Is what the thief says is what it is? Don't be afraid, things that don't have evidence are not protected by law.

Your record is invalid and can only be used as a reference, the confession of the offender, ** must be pursued, this is the procedure.

First of all, if it is only a one-sided testimony of a thief and does not receive the said stolen goods, then it is impossible to convict your father. But if the thief's ring was also stolen by him, then your father is suspected of covering up the crime of concealing the proceeds of crime.

The crime of covering up or concealing criminal proceeds" stems from the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases Related to Theft, Robbery, Fraud, and Snatching of Motor Vehicles, which came into effect on May 11, 2007. In view of the criminal acts of theft, robbery, fraud and snatching of motor vehicles, the Interpretation refines and supplements the content of Article 312 of the Criminal Law on the crime of "harboring, transferring, acquiring and selling stolen goods", and solves several legal problems in covering up and concealing stolen motor vehicles with criminal proceeds that are more common in practice and are likely to cause controversy.

For this kind of extortion, you can tell them to go directly to the court to deal with it and ask for a judicial appraisal. According to your description, if she does have a broken bone, it is impossible to play with the computer safely, and you can debate with them in public, and think about how to get them to tell the scene of the crime and prove that your mother is not at fault, so that the rumors from the outside world will stop.

If you do go to the court to settle the matter, the court will generally advocate settlement first, and in the process, you can ask for a judicial appraisal, preferably in two different appraisal centers, to prevent going through the back door. Most of the appraisal centers are in urban areas, and since they want to extort, they don't want things to get complicated, so they try to make things as complicated as possible.

If you do go through the litigation procedure, you should pay attention to the identity of the judge and clerk, whether it is related to those people, and if so, apply for recusal before trial.

Find the classmate who smiled to collect evidence recordings, preferably secretly.

Method 1: Go to the police station or court to file a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case of extortion!

The contest between people is to see whose momentum is fierce!