Again, about the theory of relativity, maybe the theory of relativity was wrong in the first place

Updated on science 2024-05-05
7 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Personally, I don't think quality and speed have anything to do with it! After all, the theory of relativity was put forward by Einstein himself, and it is a theory that people think is right and used until now, but many of these things are only at the theoretical level and have not been tested in practice.

    The conversion of energy and mass energy to each other has been proven in practice (nuclear ** is like this) then if an object does motion it must emit energy outward, then the mass of this object will only decrease and not increase, so I think he is wrong!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Ylouis, the essence of this question seems to be the same as my "is the quality relative", hehe.

    That is, relative to a fixed observer, such as you: you yourself think that the object is stationary, and then measure its mass; Then the mass of the object can be measured again in case of its motion, and it will be found.

    m m0 (2nd power root of (1-u*u c*c)); m0 is the mass of the object at rest, and u is the velocity of the object.

    In other words, in any frame of reference, there will be such a relationship established.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    This m0 only needs to measure the relative rest, and the result is the same in any relatively resting situation.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    When an object is moving, its velocity is relative, so the mass is also relative, and the key is to see what kind of coordinate system you use to observe.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Such a question is not something that the average brain can figure out.

    If you can figure it out, you're a great physicist.

    Just do your job.

    I don't think about it anyway, I get dizzy when I think about it.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Children should read more!

    What the theory of relativity predicted has not been denied by experiments, but has been slowly confirmed by experiments.

    Light is a photon, also called a quantum of light, which is a Standard Model boson with a spin of 1 and a rest mass of 0. (There is also a particle with a mass of 0 called gluons).

    Think about it, the velocity of a massless particle, and other particles with mass, such as neutrinos, will reach its speed?

    Today, what people are looking for is not a neutrino, but a boson with a spin of 0, called the Higgs boson, a particle that is designated as the source of matter.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Isn't there a recent experiment that says neutrinos are fast in light?

Related questions
9 answers2024-05-05

Yes, the Lorentz transformation in the theory of relativity can be deduced. >>>More

12 answers2024-05-05

The definition of the theory of relativity is that the speed of any object cannot be greater than the speed of light. >>>More

12 answers2024-05-05

Electromagnetic waves have a Puller effect, and the redshift and blueshift affect the wavelength and frequency, but do not affect the speed of the wave, and the speed of the electromagnetic wave is the speed of light. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-05

Einstein's theory of relativity, understood as such, is due to the fact that he limited speed to the speed of light. So there is his view of the theory of temporal relativity. Maybe it's because the human consciousness can't understand something or something. >>>More

16 answers2024-05-05

This "concrete" is not true.

The spectator in the train, the clock "ticks" twice, and the two events in the train take place in the same place. On the ground, the two events occurred in a different place. Spectators on the ground calibrate their clocks (using the radar method, which is not explained here). >>>More