Who is most likely to make it to the Final Four? Are the Final Four really strong?

It must be the South American duo and the European duo, the South American ones are of course Brazil and Argentina, and the European ones are probably Germany and Italy. I thought that considering that Germany is seeded in the tournament system and is on its home turf, it is very likely to enter the semi-finals, but Italy has that strength, and it will not be able to do so.

Brazil number one, no way, too strong!

Argentina second, perfect!

Italy is third, and maybe it will be second, and the players are profound!

Fourth, it should be England, Germany may also, and there are a few dark horses that should not be underestimated.

Please, don't ask the same question over and over again, I've done it almost ten times.

Brazil Italy will definitely come out of the bottom half.

In the first half, Argentina, Germany, England and the Netherlands are all possible, and I would prefer Argentina and the Netherlands to come out.

Argentina, Brazil, England, Spain.

Let me give you my personal opinion.

First: Brazil.

Second: Italy.

Third: Spain.

Fourth: England.

Brazil, Argentina, Italy, England.

Argentina, Germany, Italy, Brazil.

Brazil, England, Italy, Argentina.

Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Spain.

Brazil, Argentina, Germany, England.

Brazil, Argentina, Italy, Germany.

Brazil, Germany, Argentina, Italy.

Brazil, Germany, Argentina, England.

Brazil, Germany, France, Argentina.

Brazil, Germany, Italy, England.

Brazil. Germany.

Spain. Argentina.

Brazil, Argenten, England, Germany.

England, Brazil, Argentina, Germany.

Germany, Argentina, Brazil, England.

Germany, Argentina, Spain.

Brazil, the Netherlands, Italy are all rubbish.

Germany, Argentina, Italy, England.

Wait until the 20th to watch the game at 3:00 in the morning.

The eight-in-four games were all played in four days, and the top four were naturally produced, but are the teams that can be promoted really that strong?

In the eyes of fans, it seems that there are referees in every game that advances, Liaoning wins Shanxi's Simmons' penalty, Guangdong wins Zhejiang's Yi Jianlian's penalty, Shanghai wins Shenzhen, the referee's scale is different, and the judgment shooting foul is still a plus, Guangsha's win against Jilin is the last game, I didn't look at it much, but the decision was to change the soup and not the medicine. This is to send Jiang Weize off, and it would be good if he didn't send Jones off.

Of course, among these teams that have been promoted, the strength is relatively strong, but it is not good to have a referee! Or suggest if the league can produce some official report on the controversial decision.

I am a fan of Liaoning, but Liaoning is really not strong, and foreign aid is the only one in the team that has been promoted, and it basically cannot provide firepower support. Guangdong as the defending champion, the team is still Weems, Guangsha is relatively good, the players at home and abroad are more balanced, and the Shanghai guard line is relatively thin.

Therefore, there is no championship that necessarily owns anyone, except that the league has to add the referee factor (purely personal opinion) if you want to decide who wants to be inside.