What do you look for in the scoring of figure skating competitions?

First of all, it's either no wrestling or skating well, and Duhamel Radford deserves the title. The score for figure skating is made up of the base score, GOE (quality plus) and PCS (program content score). Anonymous scoring by a technical expert group (3 people) and 9 judges.

The base score is the score (jumps and throws) and the difficulty level (lift, footwork, spin, spiral) of the specified movements chosen by the competitor, as determined by the ISU experts. The more rotational cycles, the higher the base score for the more difficult jumps under the same number of rotations. The technical panel determines what action the player completes.

The goe is scored by nine judges and represents the completion of the player's movements. Points can be added for difficult jump entry, good air height and distance, and different air attitudes. Points will be deducted for falls, saving weeks (when you should have jumped for three weeks but only two and a half weeks), and wrong blades (the inside edge that should have been used to start and jump with the outside edge).

According to the quality of completion, the referee will give a GOE score of 3 to 3, and each score corresponds to a difficulty coefficient (1 corresponds, 2 corresponds, and the basic score multiplied by the difficulty coefficient is the technical score. The program content score (PCS) includes five items: skating technique (whether the skating is smooth enough, fast or not), footwork connection (whether the action and the action are connected by footwork), completion, choreography and performance.

After removing the highest and lowest scores, the average is averaged and multiplied by the coefficient (depending on the item) is the final program content score, which is a very subjective part of figure skating. After the GOE and PCS are added, the other deductions (falls, timeouts) are the final score. Comparing the small scores of Pang Qingtong Jian and Duhamel Radford, the two pairs of PCS in the short program are about the same, and the difficulty of Pang Tong's single jump and toss is lower than D r in terms of technical scores, and the difficulty of the combined spin and lift is lower than that of D r, so he is four points behind.

Free skating Pang Tong led by about 2 points in PCS, indicating that the judges recognized their performance slightly higher. However, the difficulty of single jumps and continuous jumps is much higher than that of Pang Tong, and the throwing jump uses the most difficult throwing inner four (that is, the action where Zhang Dan fell in Turin), so although there are falls and hand on the ice, the technical score is still 8 points ahead. Pang Qingtong's sound process is not zero mistakes.

Turning the second jump into a week and a half in a two-and-a-half-week streak was a major mistake and directly affected the technical score. As for Pang Qing, Tong Jian's expressiveness is in their own eyes. Personally, I think Pang Tong's expressiveness does not come from his excellent performance ability, but the aura generated by love in real life and the referee's recognition of veterans, as well as the home advantage of this World Championships.

In my opinion, Pang Qing's performances in many shows are painful and with both hands in the shape of Qiong Yao, which cannot be called extremely emotional, but this does not mean that they are not excellent athletes. <>

Figure skating competitions are more difficult, mainly depending on the pace and pattern.

Even if the noble nationality is saved, it must be positive, and standing is 5. Articulation, you say? Inexistent. Isu changed the rules for you in minutes. Otherwise, how can I say that the referee's is the most exciting, and the funny league will not deceive me