How does the D90 with the Tamron 17 50mm lens look like, and is there a lot of out of focus?

D90 + Tamron 17-50 is a cost-effective classic match.

I once had an old 17-50 with the D70S which was extremely sharp, and then there was obvious out-of-focus on the D90 and D300 bodies. I had to go out with the original D70S.

But the two D90+17-50 that I bought for a friend later did not have the problem of out of focus. So it's wise to ask an expert friend to test your lens shopping carefully.

The image of the Tamron lens is still quite sharp, the color is slightly yellowish, and the workmanship of the mirror body is decent, which should be said to be completely worthy of **.

Given that Nikon has only one of Nikon's most expensive 17-55 lenses with the same focal length constant aperture to choose from, the Tamron 17-50 is the only way to achieve a large aperture cheaply.

I don't know.,It's normal to run a little bit.,At the same time, I despise those who take more than 100 shots every day in order to prove whether there is a zoom.,Have that experience to go out and take more good things back.。。。

Tenglong's 17-50 will be, the plastic sense is very strong, in fact, it is plastic...

In the case of average, the sharpness will be the same, and in the case of circles, the sharpness is the worst, and the sharpness is the highest. The color is blue. The focusing speed is not too fast, and the sound is not small. The focal length ring burns tight, but it's fairly smooth.

I also like this lens, I don't know if it will be out of focus, it seems that it needs the help of a master!

Many of them are so matched, there should be cases of out-of-focus, but they are definitely a few.

There are too many reasons why the results of this comparison are not comparable, but it is certain that your worries about aging are superfluous.

First of all, the lenses are different and the styles are different, which has a great impact on the image quality;

Secondly, the fuselage is different, D7000 is a back-illuminated COMS, D90 is a COMS, there may be a gap in imaging (I haven't compared);

Again, the body Picture Calibration settings may be different, and this has a greater impact on the color;

Fourth, white balance settings can be different, which also affects color to a large extent (the d7000 auto white balance may be better than the d90, a little more accurate);

Fifth, shooting data such as aperture, shutter, ISO sensitivity, and EV** compensation may be different, which will also directly affect the image.

The lenses of both of you can be used universally, it is recommended that you find a chance to do a test, use M manual** mode, first set the body for optimal calibration, white balance, aperture, shutter, ISO sensitivity, and EV** compensation settings exactly the same, and then swap lenses to shoot the same picture with a tripod, and put ** on the same computer for comparison, so that you will get more credible results on the difference between the camera body and the lens.

The lens problem, your lens has a noticeable color cast.

18-200 One Lens Goes All Over the World, the imaging is poor, and you still buy an analogue. How to compare with 18-105!

The larger the focal length factor, the worse the image quality. You're 10 times that. Therefore, the prime image quality is good.

And the high feeling of D90 is not good.

The screen is not as good as the D7000!

It doesn't have to be a problem with the machine or the lens, but honestly, at your own level, can you see which image quality is better on the camera? Most likely, it is the reason for the white flat or the mode selection.

This isn't a medium telephoto, and lenses with a focal length that covers wide angles to telephoto are generally called "Tianya Lens" or "Big Zoom". A typical medium telephoto is something like the Nikon 70-300VR. Large zoom is more convenient, but image quality is not easy to do well.

At this level of 3000 yuan, the general picture quality is very bad. If after careful consideration, you really need it, then the new head 18-270 is naturally more suitable.

As for shopping, it is generally not recommended to buy sophisticated, valuable items, unless the store you plan to buy has a physical store not very far from your home (in the same city or a neighboring city) and has a good reputation. It's even better if there are sales recently. In this way, if something happens, you can go directly to the store to deal with it.

Added: Add a little bit of a view on the medium telephoto.

Medium telephoto here refers to 70-300 and the like, of course, there are also 70-200, 80-200, 80-400 and other large aperture bull heads and "long-range artillery", but the latter few are far more than the budget of 3000 yuan.

For example, the 70-200 segment of the original 730VR is very good, while the 100mm in the back is very bad, and the 730VC USD of Tamron is the opposite. As for Canon's 730L, its excellent image quality at full focal length comes at the cost of volume and **. But in any case, the overall image quality of the Nikon and Tamron 730 is still quite better than the aforementioned large zoom head.

If you are traveling, you generally need to match a standard variable head (focal length from wide angle to medium focus). Therefore, if you need to enter the medium telephoto lens, it is recommended to choose between Nikon original factory and Tamron.

The Nikon 70-300VR is recommended

Forget about Tallong's big zoom, hehe.

The new port licensed cargo is about 2900.

The picture quality is absolutely what you say, the ones you say are strong, sturdy and practical.

The image quality of the head that goes all over the world is not very good, so let's add some money to Tamron 70 200. After choosing a lens, the most important thing is to see if it runs out of focus It is recommended that it is best to go to a physical store to try the lens before deciding to buy it. It's still Jingdong and Amazon reliable, **too much moisture.

I don't know what you're shooting for, if there is an original plot, the medium telephoto is recommended on the Nikon AF-S VR 70-300mm F IF-ed Tamron 18-270 The head of the large zoom is indeed convenient, but the sacrifice is the image quality.

It's unreliable, the lens is not like clothes and shoes, I advise you, forget it, I never have to sell it!

I don't like to buy sophisticated things very much.

Nikon 18-200 is cost-effective, suitable for beginners to play, but quickly get tired of playing, Tamron still don't want it... I think it's okay.

Nikon lens focusing is a bit slow, I think Canon's lens is more cost-effective, the landlord can go to Canon's official website to see the lens suitable for his camera.

The image quality of D7000 is higher than that of D90, not only a grade.

Whether it's low or high, the D7000 is better and more delicate.

As for the lens, if you have a small budget, consider the non-stabilization version, which is the A16, which is mainly cheap.

If you have a large budget, don't buy Takron, buy Sigma's 17-50os, this good Tamoro's 17-50 is not a star and a half.

What is it for, don't you want to use it? The constancy of the Tamron is not available, compare the meat.

Sigma's is available, and the sharpness is good.

If you just play it on a regular basis, in fact, the D7000 set is enough. If you have a preference, you can choose a large-aperture prime lens, 35 is a very cost-effective and well-priced lens.

In short, D90 is too old to think about.

If you have no photography knowledge at all, it is recommended to shoot the set lens first, so as not to spend unjust money.

The Nikon D7000 is a notch higher than the D90, or the former is better. The main features of the camera are that the camera has more focus points, the number of consecutive shots is increased, and dual memory cards are used. Choose Tamron's B005, 17-50 with a shiver function, the quality is still good, it is a practical lens for civilians.

Generally, it is okay to shoot portraits, landscapes, humanities, etc. There are about 3,000 in the computer city, and about 2,6-7 on the Internet

Tenglong 17-50 can be stabilized with or without stabilization, this focal length, you can hold it without stabilization. If you have a shelf, it doesn't matter. 0 starting point, then start by learning the basics, recommend the "New York Academy of Photography Textbook", read the manual carefully, and then shoot more and watch more good films.

If you have a lot of daily use, the pullover 18-105 is actually more affordable.

If you are a beginner, I recommend considering one of the following two sticks.

Nikon D5100 or Canon 600D

Nikon ISO is high and versatile.

The Canon CMOS is a little higher.

The lenses are all standard 18-55

If the budget is sufficient, you can consider switching directly.

18-105 or 18-135 aperture lenses with larger apertures, if you're just getting started, don't get too complicated.

Remember: the camera is just a tool, it is shot with "skill" and "heart".

If you use D90+A16 for yourself, there is no upper limit for photography comparison, if you don't burn, this is the best choice. Tenglong 17-50 naturally buy A16, parallel goods 2100, the anti-shake version of B005 is not available, waste, and the overall sharpness is not high. If you use it in the print advertising industry, then it's another matter, how can a large poster be without a high-pixel machine and a high-resolution lens, D90+A16 is obviously not enough.

If you have the same lens, you will get on the D7000 if you have more money, and D90 if you have a small budget, the difference between the two is not too big, and in terms of your requirements, D90 is enough.

D7000's D90 upgrade product, but D90's performance, picture quality is not worse than D7000, electronic this Dongdong still buy new not buy old, so as not to be eliminated prematurely.

Since you are a novice, you can choose a beginner camera, although the D90 is a bit old, but it is enough for learning. But from your application perspective, you don't know how far you need to image. If the image quality needs to be very high, neither of these seems to be very good, and it is recommended to spend a little more money to buy a D800.

It is recommended to buy D90 first and then change to D800.

If you are a novice, you should buy a D3200 and add a good lens, and after two or three years, the level will reach a certain level, and then change to a mid-to-high-end body.

1. Tenglong has OEM a lot of Nikon lenses, which are close to Nikon's style, and are known as "Little Nikon" in the industry

2. The imaging of the Tamron 17 50 is better than that of the Nikon 18-135, and it is a constant aperture, which is very cost-effective, and the actual focal length of the Tamron 17-50 on the D90 is more than enough to take portraits in travel, which is a good choice.

3. If you are lazy and want to go around the world with a mirror, it is recommended to keep the Nikon 18-135, after all, it is more convenient, and it is not worth much to go second-hand, and it is good to hang up.

4. If you have transitioned to photography enthusiasts and have high requirements for image quality, don't keep the Nikon 18-135, and then match the telephoto in the future!

The focal length of the Tamron 17 is not as convenient as the 18-135, and the image quality is better than that of the 18-135, depending on which one you care about; However, if you usually use the focal length of 17-50, then 17-50, and Nikon's 17-55 is more recommended

Tamron 17 50mm recommended...

Highly recommended for on-hook ... I also bought 50

Keep them all for use... The night scene is very beautiful when you shoot it in focus... 18--135 is recommended to sell, and then enter a 70--200 good, have the money to buy the original factory, and have no money to buy the auxiliary factory... However, priority is given to the original bamboo cannons...

Hehe, of course, buy 17-50 and sell 18-135.

The effect of using the two heads is completely different, and the D90 with 17-50 is very powerful.

Zi said: **Focal length 24 70,It's basically a non-full-width 17 50,I think the focal length is not as bad as they say,Absolutely enough,With this,The set of heads will definitely be sold after a while,This head is worth it,It's just that I don't think it makes much sense to add an anti-shake,It's better to save a thousand to buy an A16,That is, without an anti-shake version,And then the pullover sells 1000,Buy a 70 300 with a thousand,So far,You don't have to change the head in recent years.,The common focal length covers all....

Making good use of the current is the king.

Personally, I recommend you to use Nikon's 18-135

Strong push 17 55 wide angle.

But it's a little expensive. Hey.

If you're short on budget, then undoubtedly 18-70 is the best option. 3 ED lenses, 1 aspherical surface, color and sharpness are not inferior to bull's head, although the wide-angle end distortion control is average, but it is also within the acceptable range. And the focal length is also perfectly connected with your 70-200.

Although the wide angle of the 18th end is not too wide, it is still enough to cope with ordinary large scenes and scenery.

As for 18-55, it will be eliminated directly, as long as you play a little deeper, this head effect is likely to be just a waste of a few hundred dollars.

18-105 is the first ...... I've ever experienced,**、Imaging、Focal length,Everything is so balanced,Balance to travel is really very handy,But,Also because of balance,And many of the focal lengths are duplicated ......Not highly recommended.

Half of the 3000 if you want to bring a little wide angle, and don't want to be a vice factory, then 18-70 it, I see that there is a recommended silver wide angle downstairs. . . It is recommended not to buy, there is no advantage in focal length, and the performance of silver wide angle in the digital age is very average, in addition to the distortion control arm 18-70 is better in imaging, the color and sharpness are not even as good as 18-70.

There is also a small recommendation, if you can complete it with a slightly tight budget, it is to find a reliable store, buy a second-hand 16-85, this head except for the lack of a constant large aperture, the rest of the performance is comparable to a bull's head, second-hand ** should not be to 4000 (of course, it is not cheap, but it is acceptable) and the wide angle of 16 is quite powerful. It's just a suggestion, and if you don't have a budget, you don't have to think about it.