Do you feel like your job is directly proportional to your pay?

proportional. Let's talk about my job first! I'm doing kindergarten teacher work now, 7:00 a.m

30 to work, 5:00 p.m., actually to about five and a half to get off work, a day is to take children, class, do cleaning, feel very tired for a day, the salary is not much, it is 2000. Those who have not done this industry think how good and easy it is to bring children!

You don't experience this kind of tiredness, three teachers manage more than 30 children, (our class is now two teachers, more than 20 children), every day worry about them for fear of accidents, parents will find you a little trivial things, not to mention that the child fell by himself, even if he was bitten by a mosquito, he will come to ask you, let you pay more attention, mosquitoes are raised by me, I want him to fall, even if the child falls at home, parents do not see much anger, the difference between preschool teachers and primary school teachers is also very big, Parents have requirements for preschool teachers to be perfect, but when children go to primary school, they never dare to go to the teacher's stubble, so this is the difference, in essence. <>

Not proportional. Last week, I joined a new company, a municipal state-owned enterprise, doing cross-border supermarkets, and the position is a business assistant. I chose this company because I was not satisfied with the job I had found for a month before, and the position in the company I liked was not qualified enough, so I felt that I didn't understand a lot and wanted to learn from a low level.

The salary of this state-owned enterprise is very low, but it is a century-old enterprise in the city, and it is relatively well-known. After the interview, I waited for half a month, and finally waited for HR's **, and it took half a month to engage in unemployment certificates, physical examinations and other matters, so I only joined the company in mid-April. This company is 90% local, and I wanted to find a company with a lot of local people, but after joining the company, I found out that there are many local people, which is not necessarily a good thing.

First of all, the salary of many locals is definitely not high, because outsiders want to rent a house, and I admit that the locals are not bold enough. <>

In fact, the current work is not directly proportional to the salary.

It is not the same as the salary of others, but the work is the same, which also reflects the importance of the establishment. Although the current salary is not proportional to the workload, it can be adjusted psychologically, because I am currently a novice in the workplace, and I am here to increase my work experience and prepare for future exams. Of course, you must learn to be "lazy" at work, after all, your workload is not proportional to your salary, and you must find a balance psychologically.

When you are working, you can have a detailed study plan and work without delaying your business.

And don't let the trivial things at work affect your exams. Seeing the treatment of others, there is a motivation to learn and work hard, motivating yourself to go ashore as soon as possible.

Complete the basic workload, the usual work can be completed in time, don't chat with others in your free time, for some unnecessary work, you don't have to do what you can do, as long as there is no problem with your own work, and you should accumulate more experience in your current position, learn more things from others, and improve your ability.

After accumulating enough experience, I have not officially entered the industry, I have been able to understand some things that are ready to attack the pass, and it is a very good opportunity to learn and adapt to the working environment in depth, when I have accumulated enough experience and have better development opportunities, I will choose to leave, after all, this is not a stable job.

The above is only a personal point of view, the current society with a high degree of education may not be able to find a satisfactory job, the most important thing is to improve their ability and experience, and the talented people who have the ability are the talents that the company is competing to choose. If it were you, what would you do? Everyone is welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.

Relatively proportional. Otherwise, I might have reported the situation to the leadership, and everyone wants their efforts and rewards to be the same. Otherwise, you may choose to leave the wild.

My salary is not proportional, and generally I will choose to quit because I feel that the workload is too large and the salary is low, and I will feel very unbalanced.

My workload is directly proportional to my salary, and if the salary is not proportional to the workload, I will quit.

Competence is not directly proportional to salary.

Relationship, the stronger the ability in a company and an industry, the higher the position he takes, the more money he makes, but if you compare horizontally, this is not the case. The reality is that some industries are sunset industries, and no matter how hard you work, you can't achieve the so-called annual salary of one million. <>

It is related to the industry in which it is located, and this is a fundamental factor. If the physical manufacturing industry wants to go to the position of the company's senior managers, it may be able to get a comprehensive income, about 1 million a year, and it must be a larger company, not a small company. But like a lot of Internet companies.

Now you don't need anything, the top 500 Internet companies are an online game company, an ordinary programmer, get 20,000 yuan a month, 30,000 yuan is very simple, but if you are a small leader, it is very simple to get 500,000 or 600,000 yuan a year. <>

It has a relationship with the platform where it is located, and the level of different companies in the same industry is of course different. Take finance, whether it is to go to an investment bank, China Merchants Bank, or an ordinary ** company.

Or finally transferred to finance-related positions, it is not the same, many people who finally learn finance have become finance and what he learns has nothing to do with it, finance is mainly investment, financing and operation, but in an ordinary company, finance generally does not come into contact with this thing. The things he learned were wasted, and it was impossible for a small company to give everyone such a high income, and only by going to the top 500 companies and going to the central state-owned enterprises could he make more money. <>

In the same company, ability does affect the salary level, but this is not absolutely proportional to Yunlula. SideslipBecause there is a leader he may not understand a lot of knowledge, compared with his peers in the era of his promotion, he is indeed much better, but now it is a bit out of keeping up with the times, but people are leaders, people don't need to do anything, every day mixed with water, hundreds of thousands of dollars a year is very simple, no matter how good a new employee is, no matter how strong his ability is, without the promotion of the position, our salary can not make much money.

Competency is not necessarily proportional to salary, because competency assessment itself is a subjective matter, and we need to look at a person's salary as objectively as possible.

In the process of work, the biggest factor that can determine a person's salary is the person's work contribution, not the person's ability. The main reason for this is that many employees often have errors in their assessment of their own abilities, which also leads to many people feeling depressed. Especially for junior employees, employees need to focus on their own work as much as possible.

When employees are able to do their jobs well, their wages will naturally increase.

Ability and wages are not necessarily directly proportional.

In most cases, there is a difference between the individual competencies assessed by employees and the competencies assessed by leaders. When employees think that they are very good at their work, their wages may not necessarily increase. For employees, employees need to pay more attention to the leader's perception of their ability to work, and evaluate their salary level by this standard.

The factor that determines wages is the contribution to the work.

This logic may be a bit of a trick, but when a person's work contribution is very large, that person's ability to work must be very strong. But when a person thinks he or she is very capable of working, he may not have contributed so much to the work he has done. Personally, we need to determine a person's salary level based on the level of work contribution as much as possible, and this way of assessing the salary level will be fairer.

Employees need to maximize their workplace value.

For employees, it is best not to refer to their own income level by their own assessed work ability, as this will lead to errors in many employees' assessment of their own income level. In most cases, as long as we can continue to improve our workplace value, and can stand in the perspective of the team and the company, employees do not need to worry about their income level at all. <>

I don't think the two are necessarily proportional, a person's salary level depends not only on personal ability, but also on whether there is a relationship with the leader.

I think it's true that salaries are primarily linked to individual abilities and individual performance.

Whether the workload is directly proportional to the salary.

Most people are proportional, but there is a conversion relationship between the workload, and there is no way to determine whether this conversion is fair or not. That is to say, people in the same profession are not much different from the same company, and different professions and different companies are much worse. <>

There is a big doubt about the conversion of workload, because some of the work is beginner, such as screwing on the factory assembly line, and he is making 1500 screws a day, which is his workload. But there is another person who is not in the factory, he invested a sum of money in the investment department of the enterprise, and today the market has risen and earned 1 million, so what is his workload? Can his workload be compared to that of the man who made 1,500 screws?

The two of them can't be completely compared. Because the work they do is completely different, and the complexity of the work is not the same. <>

Although there are such differences, we can know that the more complex the work a person is engaged in, the longer the training time required, the greater the obvious key to obtaining a high income, if anyone can do this job, simple learning can start this job with a few days of excitement, there is no future, and the competitiveness is too weak. But if this job needs to be exercised, Sanyin Qingnian can only be qualified for 5 years or even longer, and the income level of this job must not be low, because only he can, and it may not be possible to change someone. Even if it does, it takes a long time to train for too long and it is not worth it for the business.

Is this a proportional relationship, I think it depends on my understanding of wages, simply put, I feel that my current work intensity matches my salary income, and the company has given me, is it worth paying so much money for such a large work intensity? If you feel that the work is quite easy, and the income is quite good, it is directly proportional. If you think that I work too hard, it will be difficult for me to work for the company for a few thousand yuan, which is not proportional.

I don't think it's proportional, and if it's not proportional, I might just choose to quit because I feel that the workload is really overwhelming.

I don't think it's proportional; There is no way to do it if it is not proportional, because the general environment is like this, and I can still accept the current salary.

My workload is proportional to my salary, and if it is not proportional, I will defend my own rights.

Wages refer to the remuneration (including wages, bonuses, subsidies, etc.) paid by the employer to the employee in cash in accordance with laws and regulations, or the employee's commitment. In addition to the wages sent by the employer to the employees, there are also social insurance premiums paid for the employees, personal provident fund, free meals for employees in the canteen, physical benefits distributed, learning and training for employees, employee travel, etc. Therefore, remuneration is one of the various types of remuneration obtained by employees for providing services to the employer, and wages are one of the remunerations given by the employer to the employee.

The first point is that the basic purpose and practical significance, there is no fairness, justice, reasonableness and legality inside and outside, and the salary management method has no foundation; The second point is the key purpose and practical significance, the essence of compensation is to encourage employees to put a lot of diligence into their work; The third point is the ultimate goal and practical significance, no matter how good the salary management system, the last is for the company's benefit service project, without the company's benefit, the employee salary is finally a source of water, rootless water, can not be maintained.

Wage refers to the credit paid to an employee or worker on a hourly, day-by-day, or piece-rate basis. Salary, also known as wages and salaries, refers to the salary income of office workers and state civil servants. Compensation, also known as remuneration and income, refers to the various remunerations that employees receive for their work or business provided by the employer.

Salary refers to the credit paid to employees according to the market price, based on the number of hours and days. Remuneration refers to the use of professional knowledge by employees to get paid for services provided to the company.

This can be explained by the fact that you only need to know how to do simple work to get paid; And if you want to get paid, you can't just have energy, you still have to have a skill. The key to salary refers to the use value of grassroots human capital, while salary refers to the use value of high-end professional knowledge human capital. There is no distinction between high and low in the operation of everyone, but there are also differences in the meaning formed in the work.

If you do simple labor at the grassroots level, you can only get a simple wage; If you have professional skills that no one else has, not only will you be paid, but you will also have bargaining power that others do not have.