My brother is going to buy a camera, so now let s ask all the prawns

What do you do with seafood?

Recommended: Canon.

Samsung's toys are OK during the day, and when it comes to dusk, you don't want to discharge the ** that is not blurry.

Canon's shooting effect is very good, and the anti-shake is also a grade better than Samsung's, that is, when you buy it, check it, and the LCD screen of some machines will appear red.

These two are not the same,Look at the functions you pay attention to,I personally think i8 is more practical,Maybe many people say that Canon IXUS 80 is better than i8,I feel similar when I look at the sample,I think the effect is still very good with Samsung's camera,Anyway, it can meet my household requirements,Night shooting small cards are like this,Canon is the same,It's easy to paste,I8 is better in shape and function。

Samsung i8 is not good

I have an i8 at home

The photos taken are not pretty

Depressed to death

The ixus 80 is all good

But I personally like Sony's

Canon's 80 is still good, now it's around 1750!!Send 2G cards and laps!!

Of course, it's Canon, which can be described as the world's first.

I regret not buying the Canon.

I think it's better to buy Canon's Ixus 80 IS, and you can look it up on the Internet, the same machine, ** is very different. Hope you can buy a good camera at a good price.

Canon. I used the Canon 850, and it was 2700 at the time, so it was very easy to use. Samsung's quality is unreliable.

The original Japanese Canon is the most popular camera in Japan.

Maybe he thinks there are a lot of prawns in seafood.

Of course, choose Canon, Samsung doesn't have Canon***!

These are all popular card machines. There is not much difference in the level of image quality, and the CCD or CMOS size is 1 inch. The pixel height is negligible.

If you want to make rapid progress in your photography techniques and join the ranks of photography enthusiasts early, then the A3300IS is the first choice, with the most manual functions.

If you don't want to find a technique and just want to simply get a good-looking **, then choose ixus115hs.

I'm not saying that other brands are bad, or that I'm not familiar with the cameras of the aforementioned brands.

It is not easy for novices to hold the card machine with more than 5x optical zoom ratio, and the image quality of the lens is also smaller, and the zoom ratio is worse, so the telephoto end is of little significance, and there is no need to pursue 7x or 10x.

Ultra-thin is a gimmick, and the same price does not choose ultra-thin. Everyone knows that thin is more difficult to do than thick, and it costs 30% or even 50% more to reduce the thickness by 10%, but it does not help to shoot well.

The shutter button is comfortable because the ***** is very much related to the stability of the camera when the shutter is pressed, and it is difficult to get a stable "shot" with a shutter button that is too narrow, which is exactly the same as when shooting. Pressing the shutter gently and steadily in two stages, keeping the camera still is a necessary condition for shooting well.

I believe you understand the above points and you will be able to choose what you need from many cameras.

It's the smallest image sensor, and the effect is destined to be fifty steps and a hundred steps, and it's only good to be good at your own photography technology and post-production level, and it's meaningless to compare models. Under such a premise, it must be the S6200 with the widest focal length that is the most realistic, remember to pick a home camera's treasure: it is more important to shoot well than to shoot well.

The so-called zoom greatly affects the image quality, and it is nitpicking to put it in this kind of camera, which is the same as discussing 0>100 kilometers acceleration with QQ and Alto. There is also the Canon A series that has long since canceled the manual.

Canon SX150 Not bad! The image quality is good, with 12x focus, which is definitely better than any one in the XUS series! The night shooting effect is also possible!

If you choose from the above list, ixus115 bar is cost-effective.

Canon A3300, the body is small and has anti-shake.

Samsung PL120, Canon A3300 IS, Canon IXUS115 HS, Nikon S6200, Nikon S6150, Samsung PL210 These are all I like, I think Canon A3300 is good, but look at the evaluation and say that the ** picture quality is not good, so I hesitated for a long time, I want a better picture quality, playable, cost-effective machine suitable for novices, please friends help me choose one or directly recommend a suitable one.

Sports reporters chose Nikon and Canon.

Buy Sony W530, good in all respects.