Sony T77 Canon ixus960 Fujifilm F200fd

The Ixus 960 ** is around 2450, not sure if it's over budget.

Its image quality is one of the best in today's card machines. Before the launch of the Ixus 980, it was the boss of the Canon card.

Fujifilm is Z200FD, right? The F200FD doesn't seem to be out yet.

These 2 models of Fujifilm and Sony use periscope lenses.

Comparison of the T-series and the IXUS series.

The advantages of the Sony T series are that the body can be made very thin, the function and shape are very stylish, the sense of high-tech is very strong, and the large touch screen.

The disadvantage is that the imaging effect is not good, this is determined by the periscope lens it uses, this lens is small, the light intake is small, although it can minimize the thickness of the fuselage, but the lens quality is very bad, so the imaging effect is very poor.

The Canon IXUS series all use telescopic lenses, the lens aperture is large, the lens quality is relatively high, and the amount of light entering is large, so in the case of the same or similar CCD size, the imaging performance of the camera is much better, and the disadvantage is that the volume of the camera, especially the thickness, is relatively large.

In terms of imaging performance, none of the T series is as good as any of the IXUS series, and this is determined by the lenses used in each one.

In short, in pursuit of form and fashion, you can choose the T series (almost the only advantage), and the pursuit of performance, choose the Ixus series (in fact, it is also very stylish).

In other words, do you think that with Canon's technology, you can't make a camera with a periscope lens? - None of the Canons use periscope lenses.

The IXUS 960 is recommended

However, it may be out of stock.

Canon image quality is better.

If you just use it for ordinary families, choose T77, which has a beautiful appearance and is good in all aspects.

If you pay more attention to imaging, choose 960 (I feel that it is actually similar), Fujifilm does not consider it.

I just bought the T77 on November 2nd, Guangzhou Suning, 2100, 2G card, domestic camera bag.

Canon ixus960, a colleague is using it, good.

Definitely Canon's camera is the best!!

Objectively speaking, Canon's machines have always had a very good reputation, but from the late 2007 to the present, it has not done more in DC (the main focus is on SLR), but it has been squeezed out of the market by other manufacturers.

ixus960 has a certain number of years, although his imaging quality is good, and because of his age, the water content of the scum is almost slag, and the cost performance will be higher.

But it's somewhat outdated because it doesn't have a wide angle, and if you like Canon and don't dislike older models, the 860 at the same time as the 960 is a good choice.

F100FDD Personally, I think it's a good choice at this stage It's been a few months All the performance indicators are in place If you don't mind if he's a pure fool machine Now** has been more reasonable I'm now using 1 super large CCD to increase the sensitivity and low noise Make this machine's night scene shooting is very outstanding The picture effect is very delicate.

W300 has not been used, I have seen the parameters, I feel good, but Sony's machine is a bit unreliable in terms of cost performance.

In addition, the recently released Panasonic LX3 is highly recommended here, the parameters can basically dominate all DCs on the market at present, and the major forums are still in the testing stage, if you have patience, it will be a machine worth waiting for.

Of course, the w300...**。Pretty good.

Of course, Canon, I think it's good.

If you look it up, you'll know, Canon is good.

That's definitely not right.

Fujifilm has always been famous for its films, and the CCD used in the camera that is closest to the background color of the film, so it is very good to restore the natural color, and the scenery is really unique and vivid!

Panasonic's machine, as we all know, is a well-known Leica lens, which is loved by professional gamers, and Panasonic's electronic technology is first-class, and the anti-shake function is even more amazing!

Olympus's machine, although it is not as loud as Sony and Canon, but with the good reputation and solid machine of others, the sales are amazing.

Nikon, the card machine is mediocre, when it comes to SLR, who is competing with it? Look at the goods in the hands of the masters, it's either Nikon or Canon!

Panasonic's machine, wide angle has an advantage, Fuji's machine, telephoto has an advantage, Sony's machine, fashionable, beautiful, non-professional people can choose, here refers to the card machine, if it is professional, Sony's Alpha series is also quite strong.

No, Panasonic is currently the best card machine, this is Japan's evaluation, Canon is just a good SLR, the card machine is still OK before 2007, but in recent years it has been surpassed by Panasonic, Ricoh, etc., Fuji is also slowly surpassing Canon, Canon high-end SLR is still very good, but the card machine is thinking about Sony, more and more pursuit of appearance, do not pay attention to the price, especially the ixus series is not good, basically no one buys it in Japan, but the ixus series is still quite popular in China, Canon advertising and big brands have confused the hearts of Chinese, thinking that everything is good if Canon is good, Panasonic sales in foreign card machines far exceed Canon, this can be checked, Panasonic has strong electronic technology, optical technology is indeed inferior to Canon, so Panasonic does not produce its own lenses, but uses the lenses of the world-famous brand Leica, so the card machine surpasses Canon.

Overall, Canon is strong, the same configuration is still better than Sony Canon Nikon, and the difference between the card players is not very big, after all, there is not much difference in technical content.

The card machine is basically the same as those technologies. Sony's looks better. Canon, Nikon's are better.

At present, the card machine is cost-effective, the first to recommend Panasonic and Fuji these two brands, Panasonic workmanship is good, with Leica lens support, the lens quality is relatively high in the card machine, Fuji workmanship is not outstanding, but its CCD is more distinctive, the dynamic range is relatively large, and the new machine also has phase difference focusing. Generally, the models below Fujifilm 2000 are very cost-effective, the CCD is a little larger than that of Canon and Sony, and the quality of Panasonic's high-end machines even exceeds Canon's top machines.

Casio is a popular brand recently, mainly because the body is cost-effective and functional, but there are no high-end products.

Canon Sony's mid-range machine has good workmanship, stylish appearance, and convenient warranty, but it doesn't use more CCD, Sony has several back-illuminated CMOS machines with strong noise control ability, while Canon's machines are generally decent, and low-end machines are not very kind.

Cost-effective more than 2000 to buy Canon! 2000 or less to buy a retest! Don't think about anything else! Sony is the big brother of the audio category! Canon's low-end model is to sell a brand!

My personal recommendation is Casio, followed by Canon.

I sell digital cameras, and I think Canon is good and cost-effective.

It's safe to say that Yuanran's current cameras all have a red-eye prevention function, because this feature has neither cost nor technical difficulty. Maybe it's because Canon didn't take this out to advertise it.

In terms of image quality, the 960 beats the T300 because of the former's larger CCD size, and Canon's lenses have more experience in processors. Sony is still a newcomer to this area.

For the card machine, the inch is good. If it's too big, the difference is cracked, it costs electricity, and the resolution of 90 and 960 is the same, so the display of 960 is more delicate.

Recommendation 960

I advise you to buy Canon's, Sony's face is quietly distorted, and Canon's color is more correct; And you don't have to buy Canon 960, you can buy 950 to talk about wheels, but 950 has been discontinued.

In terms of performance, the T70 is about the same as the 80is, the Canon has less noise, and the Sony has vivid color reproduction. The performance of the 960 is considered the best of the three, but the appearance is not very good, **on the high side. It's good to choose the T70, it's enough for home use, it's easy to carry, and it looks beautiful.

The quality of the touch screen can be assured and will not affect the lifespan.

Now the price of 960 is more cost-effective, and the configuration is very good, recommended, 80 is more good-looking, general.

T70 garbage,The display effect of the touch screen is called a time.。

BenQ is the first from the bottom, and this should be indisputable.

Casio and Samsung are more or less stained with Pentax's light, otherwise it is the level of BenQ.

Sony, in fact, it's not bad, although the industry is making game consoles and electrical appliances, but it has merged Kemei, made a card machine for many years, and has the ability to produce its own CCD CMOS, and now the level is also on the middle.

Ricoh, the film era was famous, and now it is in decline.

Fuji is now playing card machine and large format.,Someone actually said that Fuji is bad.,Speechless.,Let's first understand what a large format is.。

Olympus and Panasonic currently have a cooperative relationship, and the M43 system it launched is still very competitive, Olympus itself is a medical optical equipment, coupled with Panasonic's technology in electronics, the market share of these two companies is also increasing.

Kodak has long stopped playing DSLR, and now makes money by selling card machines for entertainment and producing CCDs.

As for Canon and Nikon, they have been fighting each other since the sideshaft era and have not been able to distinguish between winners and losers, and the first and second positions in market share are still very solid, and they also have their own strengths.

The best: Canon, Nikon, of course, are the best brands. Sony is not bad either.

In Japan, Casio also sells less than Canon Nikon.

Worst: Kodak, BenQ.

The question is general.

In DSLR cameras, Canon is suitable for sports, journalism, commercial photography. Nikon is suitable for use in journalistic, sports, and working environments under harsh conditions. Fujifilm is suitable for commercial photography. Olympus portrait photography is also good, and the others are not recommended.

Among the consumer-level card machines, the most unselectable is Nikon (Nikon), followed by Kodak, Samsung, Ricoh, and BenQ are the garbage in the garbage, don't even think about it.

Obediently, someone actually said that Fuji is the worst, have you ever touched the camera? Do you still go to Gome Suning to buy it? Slaughtered, huh?

BenQ's is a little worse. Canon's best.