Experts suggest that leftover men from the countryside be exported to the cities, what is the purpos

As far as the development of the country is concerned, our whole country is indeed developing in the direction of progress, and the cities are also making continuous progress, and the speed of development is particularly fast, but many places in the rural areas are still poor. Therefore, for the development of rural areas, the state will have certain policies, and at this time, people will be confused. I think this is true, the more rural surplus value is used, after all, if there are too many leftover men here in the countryside, it will be an obstacle to the development of the countryside.

There is also a solution to the problem of singleness, let's analyze it in detail.

1: Residual value:

First of all, I will give you an example, for example, one thing can be completed by two of us, but at this time there are suddenly five people, if five people come to do this, it will indeed be more worry-free, and more labor-saving, but the salary and efficiency of five people will be greatly reduced. Therefore, if we consider it from this point of view, the surplus value of the rural areas should be exported to the cities, and their value will be greatly improved. At the same time, it also allows more opportunities for rural development, which is a very good choice.

Therefore, I think the national policy this time is very good, and it is also for the sake of rural development.

2: The problem of being single:

In addition, we will find that many men in the countryside will face a more troublesome problem, that is, they are single, they can't find a suitable partner here, and at the same time, they can't get the opportunity to reflect their value here, and they are unwilling to go out to work. So this time, the country's policy and privacy give these people the opportunity to develop themselves, and at the same time, they can also earn money, help the local economy develop, and get rid of the problem of singleness. Therefore, I think this policy will be a relatively big solution to the problem of local boys' singleness.

But I want to tell you that the country's policy is really better. But if we don't work hard, we still can't change the situation. The state's policy is always to help the rural areas move forward, but when it comes to our individual situation, we must change it according to the actual situation of the individual.

In other words, there are policies at the top and countermeasures at the bottom. After the above policy comes out, we follow the policy, and at the same time make reasonable changes according to our own actual situation, and the reasonable application of our subjective initiative will be the greatest improvement for ourselves, and it is also the key reason for the progress of the entire rural area. Here are some basic suggestions for you, the change of thinking is the key, don't be lazy.

Because there are too many older single women in urban areas, and there are very many older leftover men in rural areas, this is why they consider it this way.

Experts may think that leftover men in the countryside can't earn much money working in the village, so they are singles; They went to the city to work and earn more money than they did at home, so they could marry wives.

For the sake of fertility, China is about to enter an aging society, and China's fertility rate is a cliff**, so it is recommended that the remaining men go to cities where a large number of women are gathered.

I guess I want to relieve the pressure of a declining fertility rate.

At present, the situation of men and women of childbearing age in China is that older leftover women in urban areas cannot marry, while older leftover men in rural areas cannot marry daughters-in-law.

Therefore, the so-called experts came up with such a trick on a whim.

However, you don't have to think about it to know how it works. This idea can be said to be beautiful, but it does not conform to reality and is destined to be a utopian dream.

Why?

This is a serious mismatch of resources.

Older urban leftover women are generally highly educated and high-income people, and they have high requirements for their partners, so they are leftover. The leftover men in the countryside are often low-income people with no education, and to put it bluntly, they are picked up and leftover.

In this way, the two groups are obviously not matched in the marriage market, and it is impossible to combine them into a marriage body.

First, the surplus men from the rural areas must be imported into the cities to balance the proportion of men and women of appropriate age, so that the number of surplus men and women can be reduced.

The number of newborns has been declining year by year, and although the two-child policy has been opened, it has had little effect. In such a situation, the aging of the population has become a very serious problem, and in a few decades, the proportion of the population is estimated to be even more worrisome.

Experts probably think that the fertility rate has a lot to do with the marriage rate, and if the older leftover women and leftover men are solved, then the fertility rate should be able to have a small peak.

Therefore, these experts have come up with the trick of exporting leftover men from the countryside to the cities, so that their chances of contact will increase, and then the possibility of marriage will be much greater.

Second, in fact, the gap between these two groups is too big, even if they barely enter marriage, it will not last long, and it will not play much role in solving the population problem.

In fact, I think this is the wishful thinking of the experts themselves, and the leftover men in the countryside are willing, but the problem is that the older leftover women in the cities are not necessarily willing.

For the leftover men in the countryside, they don't have any conditions to get their hands on, and if they can really marry the leftover women in the city, they will earn it.

And for the leftover women in the city, after studying hard for more than ten years, they finally got ahead and got rid of the past living environment, how could they choose the leftover men in the countryside. Maybe they worked so hard to get out of the countryside at the beginning so that they could not marry leftover men in the countryside as they wished, and if you give them this policy now, they will definitely not do it.

I don't know how experts think about the problem, and just because you see the gathering of gender groups, you can't find a way to bring them together.

This is not practical at all, these two people have nothing in common, how can they get married and have children. At the end of the day, nothing will change at all about what it should be or what it should be.

I agree with this suggestion, because in this environment, it is not easy to make money, most of the women go to the city to work and beg for a living, and there is little left in the countryside, so the surplus men can export to the city to bring light and strong labor, and can also create opportunities for male compatriots to meet girls, and there is no harm.

This proposal was intended to increase the marriage rate and fertility rate by combining women who are currently unable to find a partner in the city with men who cannot find a partner in the countryside. But I think these two parties should be incompatible with each other, urban women don't look down on rural singles, and rural singles will also dislike urban women for not being gentle and virtuous.

In fact, the expert's focus is not on the leftover men in the rural areas marrying the leftover women in the cities, but only to let the leftover men in the rural areas develop in the cities and shorten the gap between urban and rural development, but they have been misinterpreted by others.

This suggestion is mainly to solve the problem of uneven matching of resources among the remaining male and female population, give many unmarried people the opportunity to get along, and reduce the widening gap between the proportion of men and women in rural and urban areas.

The city is crowded. This can speed up the success rate of single men. It can also contribute to the GDP of the city.

I think this proposal will help to reduce the number of single people and increase the number of people, because the data shows that there are now more men than women, especially in rural areas, so a moderate amount of proximity to the cities will reduce this disparity.

In combination with the work of rural revitalization, we should vigorously develop the rural industrial economy, promote the increase of farmers' income, narrow the gap between urban and rural areas, and promote the two-way flow of urban and rural population, so that young women in urban areas do not regard the countryside as a daunting path.

Because most of the leftover women are in the cities. Moreover, if it is exported to the cities in this way, it will help to increase the labor force in the cities, and thus lead to an increase in the income of rural households.

I don't think the experts' advice is a bit unreliable, the leftover men in the countryside want to export to the city, and use the leftover women in the city to consume? I would like to ask you, single women in the city can't even look down on many high-quality men, let alone leftover men in the countryside? That's why I said that this suggestion is a bit too unreliable, and seeing this suggestion, I believe that more women are more and more determined to be single.

I feel that this suggestion is to mess with the mandarin duck spectrum, you must know that the leftover men in the countryside and the leftover women in the city cannot achieve the effect of the door-to-door match, the so-called door-to-door pair does not mean that the economic conditions are similar, but the three views and ideas of two people must be the same. It's a good idea, but it's a bit too impractical. The reason why many single women in the city are reluctant to get married is because they have not found a good partner, most of these women are financially independent women, and even many are strong women in the workplace.

First of all, the living conditions and three views of the two people are too different, for example, in some places, the idea of male preference for sons over daughters in rural areas is very serious, and single women in many cities may not even want children, so how can these two people combine to have the same three views? Moreover, the living environment of the two people is not the same, the living environment in the countryside is indeed worse than that in the city, and the transportation is not very convenient, so how can a single woman adapt to such a life? I have never looked down on rural people, but the combination of the two is really not appropriate.

Many urban single women will not grieve themselves in order to get married, and their requirements for the choice of partners are usually very high, otherwise it is impossible to be single or unwilling to get married. And there are many women who are reluctant to get married, because they live very freely nowadays, and they enjoy this kind of life, and there are many excellent men in the city, and it is impossible not to have the opportunity to choose. The reason why they are not married is simply because they don't want to get married.

So I think it's better not to mess with the mandarin duck spectrum, which is unlikely to have a good effect.

Those leftover women in the city can look at the singles in the countryside, then they will not be alone until now! There is no practicability, unless it is forcibly allocated!

I don't think it's reasonable, people in the city generally want to find the city, and if the men in the countryside are not very rich, it is difficult for them to get into their eyes.

I think it can be promoted because there is an imbalance in the ratio of men and women now, and with the development of some regional economies, it is still necessary to implement this policy.

I think this suggestion is still very good, so that it can solve the problem of leftover men in rural areas.

I feel problematic with this suggestion. What should be pursued now is equal love, and there is no problem of exporting to **.

The ratio of men and women in society is seriously imbalanced, and many older leftover men and women have been going on blind dates, but they are still single, and some experts suggest that older leftover men may be exported to the city, which has caused a lot of controversy. Some people think that this is not advisable, but others feel that such a solution is a way to solve the problem of single young people marrying. Regarding the experts' suggestion that the leftover men from the countryside should be exported to the cities, here are my opinions.

First of all, there is an obvious gap between the living standards of rural areas and cities, although it is said that the current rural revitalization has not caught up with the speed of urban development, so it is difficult to say that the surplus men from rural areas are exported to the cities. Secondly, the concept of rural and urban residents is different, rural leftover men are more traditional men, they are not suitable for urban women, so even if they are together, there will be a big contradiction of concepts, but it is inevitable, in the end, urban women generally look down on rural men, regional prejudice still exists, and the woman's parents will not agree.

1. Urban development is faster than that of rural areas.

There is an obvious gap between the living standards of rural areas and cities, although it is said that the current rural revitalization has been carried out, but in the end it has not caught up with the speed of urban development, so it is difficult to say that the surplus men from the rural areas are exported to the cities.

The concept of rural and urban residents is different, and the leftover men in the countryside are all more traditional men, and they are not suitable for urban women, so even if they are together, there will be a big conceptual contradiction, but it is inevitable.

Three: there is a geographical bias

Urban women generally look down on rural men, regional biases still exist, and the woman's parents do not agree. Marriage is not for poverty alleviation, but for the sake of strong alliances and help their children's careers.

Maybe it's just to solve the urgent need, and many girls are in the city. If the boys were to be separated from the city, it would be a good solution for them.

I think the ideal is very beautiful, the reality is very skinny, this theory is to solve the ratio of marriage between men and women in urban and rural areas, but the actual implementation is very difficult, after all, girls generally have high requirements for boys, and they are left in the countryside, so can they be good in the city?

The opinion of the experts is only to consider the two groups of people together, but it does not consider whether the urban leftover women and the rural leftover men are ideologically compatible.

As for the expert's suggestion that "leftover men from rural areas are exported to cities", I think it is unreliable, because there are many leftover men in cities, and leftover men in rural areas basically have no higher education, and it is more difficult to survive in cities without excellent technology, and at the same time, the gap between the proportion of men and women is relatively large, and "exporting leftover men from rural areas to cities" is simply unrealistic.

With the continuous development of society and the continuous improvement of the economy, the gap between people is getting bigger and bigger, which has led to the emergence of leftover men in many rural areas, and this is not small. As for the expert's suggestion that "rural leftover men export to the city", I very much disagree, because in order to survive in the city, we must have the ability to survive, which is higher than working in a factory, and it is more difficult for the rural leftover men to survive in the city without excellent skills and technology, and at the same time, it is not realistic to solve the population problem by "exporting the leftover men from the countryside to the city", because the economic foundation of urban people is better, and the average rural family does not look down on it, and I think the expert's suggestion is not operational.

First, it is more difficult for "leftover men from rural areas to export to cities" to survive.

You must know that living in the city requires excellent technical skills, if there is no good technology and skills to live in the city is very difficult, basically the fate of being eliminated, the rural leftover men generally have a relatively low level of education, no professional technical expertise, and there is no advantage in the face of urban competition, relatively speaking, they are more suitable for factory work, "rural leftover men to the city to export Xi Minyuan" is not realistic.

Second, the purpose of the experts may be to solve the problem of low fertility, but the reality is even more brutal.

With the increasing aging of the population, the birth rate is getting lower and lower, and I feel a bit ridiculous that the expert's suggestion of "rural leftover men to the city is exported", people in the city are basically better educated, and the economic foundation is better, at this time I think it may be very difficult for them to choose objects with worse ability or worse conditions, and the fertility problem cannot be solved at all, because the reality is more cruel.

3. What do you think of the expert's suggestion that "leftover men from the countryside are exported to the city".

I think it's ridiculous, it's okay in theory, but it's meaningless to take the reality and human marriage psychology well, because leftover men are inevitable problems in social development, which are difficult to solve, and there are too few operability in reality, and it is not realistic to "export leftover men from rural areas to cities".