Do you think it is possible for humans to evolve into a higher species?

No, because in nature, in order to survive and reproduce, living things must adapt to the rapid changes in nature. Therefore, their body shape has changed with the change of environment over the course of history. Humans are higher beings because they make and use tools, and tools replace their own evolution in nature.

So when Homo sapiens appeared, the evolution of human beings has been greatly reduced. For example, the hair on the body, with the production of clothes, the body hair tends to decrease. For example, teeth, the advent of cooked food has flattened human teeth.

Therefore, it is not that human beings do not evolve, but because of the production of tools and the development of science and technology, they have replaced human evolution.

It is impossible for humans to evolve into higher animals, and according to the theory of evolution, humans are already the highest intelligent beings in this space. The current problem is that although human beings are the most developed animals on the earth, in the universe, we are far from realizing our potential, which has nothing to do with evolution, the human brain only uses two layers of space, human beings should live up to 160 years old, and human beings should still have some special functions.

There is no such thing as evolution. There is no such thing as a higher organism. The theory of evolution has been translated as the theory of natural evolution, which is more accurate than the theory of evolution.

Tianyan adapts to changes in the environment, and evolution presupposes a hierarchical sequence of species, if that's the case, just like a class of students, the lower creatures hundreds of millions of years ago should have all graduated! In fact, species that are much older than humans, such as cockroaches, have not evolved in the direction of intelligence.

Evolution is inevitable, but it is not a comprehensive evolution, that is, evolution is degenerate, and there is evolution in degeneration. Evolution in nature relies on natural selection, but in humans this factor has a much smaller effect, but another factor comes into play, and that is human intervention.

At the current rate of ecological destruction and environmental pollution, there will be some obstacles for humans to evolve into higher organisms, and of course it is not denied that there will be other conditions that will lead to other changes. However, I personally believe that it is basically difficult for humans to evolve into higher beings.

If we are given enough time and enough time, we will become a new form of rational existence, a form that is itself free from the limitations of our animal nature, and all our actions begin to be carried out in a way that mathematically makes it more likely that we will continue to exist. Perhaps this is the ultimate state of life. Rationality is not the shackles of thought, but the wings of thought, and the loss of sensibility does not mean the loss of creativity, reason itself has more powerful creativity.

Of course, although the evolution of human beings is very slow, for example, under the new technological revolution, human beings have gradually begun to become thinner limbs and larger brain volumes, as long as a creature has the requirements for progress, it will evolve.

The evolution of living things usually goes through a long period of evolution, so the foundation of the theory of human evolution is whether the earth can always maintain a good living environment, so this answer is not certain.

Natural selection, survival of the fittest.

In fact, this is just an accident, only human beings have high intelligence. The same can be said from an evolutionary point of view. Animals can be said to be like this, but it is still a little doubtful to say that man evolved from apes.

In the process of evolution, many animals have gone extinct, either due to their inability to adapt to their environment or because they have failed in the competition with their human ancestors.

Many of the early hominin fossils found so far are not all direct ancestors of humans, and many are species that are very closely related to human ancestors.

Therefore, it is not only humans who have evolved as a higher animal, but all of the human animals except humans have become extinct.

Apes, primate mammals, modern mammals, ancient mammals, ancient reptiles, ancient amphibians, ancient fishes.

Humans didn't evolve from Earth creatures?

With the development of the skeleton fossils of primitive man Aldi, people began to gradually realize that whether it was the original "human freedom theory", "human creationism", or the later "Darwinian evolutionary theory", and then the later "species degradation theory". are more or less one-sided and misleading.

But there is one basic point that is correct - "natural selection, survival of the fittest".

Some creatures lose their eyes because they don't need light; Some organisms evolved from unicellular to multicellular; Some creatures develop fins because they need to survive underwater, but they lose their quadrupedal ......Have they evolved or degenerated?

They just evolved.

Aldi was found to have both human walking ability and chimpanzee climbing ability, while some of her descendants no longer had the ability to walk and evolved into the chimpanzee it is today. So we found that humans did not learn how to walk, but forgot how to crawl, and that chimpanzees did not learn to walk, but that their ability to walk has deteriorated.

It turns out that we humans are not the only ones who are evolving, but also the chimpanzees, and the primitive skill of walking has been degraded in the chimpanzees. In the future, we can no longer say that chimpanzees are more primitive than we are, because we have a more primitive way of moving than chimpanzees – walking on both feet. And chimpanzees also have a more primitive place than we do – quadrupedal climbing.

So, is there also intellectual degeneration in human beings? Could it be that some ancient humans, although they did not invent the technology of today, were more intelligent than our people today? Are we evolutionary or degenerate?

Maybe we're really just evolving, whether we're going backwards.

Is it possible for the lower organisms in the world to evolve into higher organisms? Personally, I believe that this is not a question of possibility, but an inevitable development of the evolutionary process of hierarchical organisms. Why?

Because the survival of all living things on the earth is the ecological embodiment of the stages of the times, any biological species is constantly evolving from the single cell of the most primitive life form, and the evolution of living things is epochal and synchronous, which is a long process of genetic proliferation. The establishment of the earth's biosphere requires the simultaneous existence and evolution of hierarchical organisms born and existing in different eras.

In order to ensure the benign operation of the biosphere, ensure the existence of a large number of inventories of gene banks of different biological species, and ensure the formation of ecological phenomena of hierarchical biodiversity. The survival form of any species is a staged ecological manifestation, and there is no immutable species on the earth, and with the passage of time, biological species of different ages on the earth will undergo the ecological evolution phenomenon of mutation and variety.

The comparison between different ages of the same species is the reality of the mutation that has occurred. The natural evolution of organisms is the embodiment of hierarchical advancement, and the existence of organisms at different levels is the ecological basis that promotes the evolution of organisms at different levels, and the lower the level of organisms.

The survival number of its existence will be relatively more, the higher the level of organisms, the smaller the survival number of its existence, and the organisms will always develop towards a more advanced development trend, and there will always be species that will enter the level of higher organisms in stages, and jointly build the pyramid level of the earth's biosphere.

to ensure the benign existence and development of the biosphere. Therefore, this answer is not a question of possibility or impossibility, but an inevitable development result of the evolutionary process of hierarchical organisms, and it is also the natural law of the development of biological evolutionary ecology. I wonder if this is accurate?

Yes. Because the earth's environment is always changing, and living things are always evolving, it is possible for lower organisms to evolve into higher organisms.

No. Because now the temperature of the earth is constant, there are no conditions for biological evolution. And biological evolution is a very long process.

Actually, it is possible, but this evolutionary time needs to be very long, and it is a very long process.

They have also evolved, but more slowly, and not in the same direction as humans.

Because the evolution of human beings has gone through hundreds of millions of years, animals similar to humans may not have reached the time, and their existence time is relatively late, so the degree of purification of animals similar to humans is not high compared with humans.

It's not that there is no evolution, it's just that the speed of evolution is relatively slow, after all, humans are advanced animals, and there is still a big gap between animals and humans.

It's not that they haven't evolved, it's that they have evolved differently from humans. All living things are evolving.

With the development of human beings on the earth over the years, our technology and cognition have become more and more advanced over time, and human beings have become the most powerful species in nature, from the birth of human beings to the establishment of civilization.

But before human beings ruled the natural world, the overlords of the earth were dinosaurs, and they existed on the earth for a long time, so the question is, survival, why didn't dinosaurs evolve into advanced animals? Didn't give birth to a civilization of its own? Let's hear what the experts have to say.

According to the research of experts, the dinosaurs on the earth appeared in ancient times and became extinct 65 million years ago. Why is it that on this night of our human birth, a civilization that is completely different from other animals can appear?

First of all, from the body size and environmental observation between the two, the weight of dinosaurs is generally 50 to 60 tons, and some dinosaurs are even larger, the height is equivalent to a building, such a behemoth, in the face of natural disasters in the process of large size is unable to hide and avoid disasters, especially in terms of natural enemies, in addition to dinosaurs self-generated carnivorous dinosaurs, they are generally herbivorous, competing with each other, without any population cooperation and exchange. There is no bigger competitor than dinosaurs on their own.

On the other hand, human beings, we look at development from the weak life, face the harsh environment, and other large animal species that are more aggressive than themselves, our human ancestors learned to communicate and cooperate, and the most important thing is to use tools to use tools to complete the natural enemies that are greater than the natural forces of the autogenesis, that is, in the continuous competition and confrontation, to get evolution. At the same time, in terms of food, human beings know how to cook food, obtain more nutrients, and promote the evolution of the brain.

In terms of reproduction and its own species, dinosaurs are oviparous animals, and birds need to lay eggs to reproduce species, oviparous organisms have a characteristic that they rarely need to communicate and cooperate, but we, as mammals, are the biggest reason why we can develop civilization is that we know cooperation, know how to think, and have the ability to think. But these are all things that dinosaurs don't have.

Dinosaurs, despite their large size, had an advantage in this regard, but their brains were actually very small, which made them unable to fully control their entire bodies, which was what restricted them from being an advanced species.

Because in addition to taking a long time to evolve into an advanced species, it also requires coincidence, and the dinosaurs themselves should have been able to evolve into advanced species, but they became extinct in advance, so they did not evolve.

Because the brain capacity of the dinosaur limited its continued development, and it had no natural predators, it lived a relatively comfortable life and would not evolve.