Evaluate whether the Ming Dynasty was better or the Qing Dynasty

Ming dynasty! During the Ming Dynasty, China showed an advanced, friendly, and powerful empire, in the Ming Dynasty, we Chinese were already able to skillfully form gunpowder troops, skillfully and continuously improve artillery and production technology, and the political atmosphere of the Ming Dynasty was the best. In the Ming Dynasty, Chinese feudal society reached its strongest period, which can be said to be the time when the Chinese were most proud.

Specifically, I suggest you read "Those Things in the Ming Dynasty", which contains a very detailed history of the Ming Dynasty, and the book written by this scholar is very good.

It doesn't matter if you have my opinion or not, but I really hope you can read this book and feel the pride of Chinese - Daming!!

The Qing Dynasty is already a period of weakness in China, even if the prosperous era of Kangqian is just the afterglow of the sunset, just relying on a strong feudal economic foundation and the illusion of a strong foreign force in the middle of the Ming Dynasty, I also don't agree with the statement downstairs: After the founding of the Ming Dynasty, there was nothing remarkable?? You are wrong, Wanli and Hongji are both very famous monarchs!

In addition, the Ming Dynasty was replaced by the Qing Dynasty is the only advanced nation in history that was conquered by backward nations, this is not a normal replacement of history, it can be said that there is a little personal reason in it (and Li Chengliang has a lot of responsibility), even if the Qing Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty fought against the Ming Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty could still fight the Qing Dynasty while fighting the peasant uprising, and the Ming Dynasty had many opportunities to turn defeat into victory, but it was not grasped.

The Ming Dynasty already had a very powerful musket force, how is this compared to the Qing Dynasty soldiers who were stunned in the face of British musketeers? ?

Don't say much, read the book.

You can't just look at the emperor of a dynasty to judge the quality of a dynasty Zhu Yuanzhang in the Ming Dynasty was meticulous in taking care of the Ming Dynasty Kangxi Yongzheng Qianlong in the Qing Dynasty created a "prosperous era of Kangqian" Each dynasty has the historical trajectory and the rise and fall of glory and disgrace in each dynasty If we talk about national strength, we can't generalize Both dynasties have a peak of prosperity and then decline This is also related to the law of history Generally speaking, it is necessary to analyze specific problems in detail.

The Ming and Qing dynasties were both at the end of feudal society, and the two dynasties were just as rubbish and dark.

The Ming Dynasty implemented the eight-share harvest, creating a large number of waste materials and withering talents. Zheng He went to the Western Ocean, and the scenery was infinite on the surface, but in fact, it was an act of tribute, which was not beneficial to the outside world. Implement a policy of terrorism, Dongchang Jinyiwei, and implement oppressive and terrorist management against the people.

The Qing Dynasty was quite prosperous in the early period, but it was the end of the strong crossbow, the world was advancing, the Qing rulers were afraid of change, completely closed the country, implemented a small peasant economy, the country's development stagnated, and gradually fell behind in the world, until it was forced to open the country by foreign ships and cannons, and lost power and humiliated the country.

Now that you know that the emperor of the Ming Dynasty is promising, and the emperor of the Qing Dynasty is diligent in government, then, just imagine, what is the purpose of diligent government? Isn't it just promising? So from your point of thinking, the Ming emperor achieved the goal of the Qing emperor. So, the results are obvious......

You say that the emperor of the Ming Dynasty was not as diligent as the emperor of the Qing Dynasty??? No, no, Emperor Chongzhen of the Ming Dynasty was the most diligent emperor in Chinese history, working 14-16 hours a day, Chongzhen first, Yongzheng second.

Personally, I think that the Ming Dynasty was better than the Qing Dynasty, let's just say that the late Ming Dynasty did not bring so many humiliations and wars to the country as the late Qing Dynasty, and the most important thing is that the development of the Ming Dynasty has always been the development of the productive forces and means of production and the trend of the times. Although the Qing Dynasty also developed, it was contrary to the trend of the times, otherwise would our current Chinese nation still need to mention the great rejuvenation?

Personally, I think the Qing Dynasty is good. The Qing Dynasty had a prosperous era of Kangqian and Qian, the Qing Dynasty ethnic relations were unprecedentedly strengthened, the Qing Dynasty had famous emperors: Kangxi, Qianlong, Yongzheng, etc., and the Qing Dynasty capitalism sprouted.

The commodity economy is developing rapidly. It has been ruled by many emperors. So the Qing Dynasty is good.

It's all about the same, but the Qing emperors are too arrogant, like a frog at the bottom of a well, thinking that everything about them is good. In addition to the founding of the Ming Dynasty, the others seem to have done nothing.

Qing Dynasty: Because most of the emperors of the Qing Dynasty are industrious, you think that the Ming Dynasty is good because you are Han Chinese.

Of course, it was the Ming Dynasty, and that was because the emperor of the Qing Dynasty changed history.

In the Ming Dynasty, the Qing Dynasty had the Opium War, which threw away the Chinese people, and left the Chinese antiquities to foreign countries.

The Qing Dynasty was simply a loser, with a legacy of thousands of years, and all the family foundations were lost.

The Ming Dynasty, whether in terms of science and technology, people's livelihood or commerce, as well as the relatively democratic atmosphere of the Ming Dynasty, not to mention the uncompromising backbone.

I think that the Ming Dynasty is at least tougher than the Qing Dynasty, not to mention anything else, but to talk about the last emperor.

I feel that the Ming Dynasty is better, the Qing Dynasty settled in the Central Plains is a backward civilization forced into by force, did not bring advanced culture, look at the later development of our country, you can know, blind and arrogant, closed off the country. And the Ming Dynasty was relatively better.

The Ming Dynasty was relatively good, and the economy and navigation technology of the Ming Dynasty (Zhenhe went to the Western Ocean) were better than those of the Qing Dynasty.

Objectively speaking, there is nothing good or bad, they have all made contributions to China, especially in the late Qing Dynasty, the land was ceded and the reparations were paid, and the big pigtails of the Chinese people were deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, and the world knew everything, and finally led to the establishment of New China, and we could still access the Internet or something, and the Qing Dynasty made great contributions.

The hardness of the Ming Dynasty is also the hardness of the royal family, and it is not that the people pay for them with blood! I'd rather be a peaceful dog than a troubled world, and as a small common man, don't always think of yourself as an emperor. If you haven't experienced war, don't ignore the horror of war.

The war in the Ming generation has not stopped, and the Qing Dynasty was indeed peaceful in the middle of the world, and the common people wanted this.

I think it's better to be in the Ming Dynasty! The policies of the Ming Dynasty also had a certain role in promoting the country's economy!

It's not good, it's all closed and dark, and the Song Dynasty is the best.

You can't generalize from one side to another, there are good and bad ones!

Each is good in its own way, but relatively speaking, the Qing Dynasty was much better than the Ming Dynasty. Because we can know it from the history of the Qing Dynasty compared with the Ming Dynasty. Only a clear monarch can last, you say.

The Qing Dynasty was relatively good, at least out of the prosperous era of Kangqian.

The Ming Dynasty is good, it is a colorful era.

Zheng He of the Ming Dynasty also went to the West, but the Qing Dynasty closed himself to the country.

The Qing Dynasty only made us more backward, and the Ming Dynasty had Zheng He go to the West, and the troops also had muskets and artillery, not to mention that the Qing Dynasty was strictly not the orthodox dynasty of our Han people.

It is an indisputable fact that the Qing Dynasty was far superior to the Ming Dynasty. Emotionally reluctant to accept it, but it is necessary to look at history objectively and fairly.

Zhu Yuanzhang of the Ming Dynasty stipulated that only 32 million stones were collected in the country, no matter how much the output increased in the future, and later the national output was hundreds of millions of stones, but the tax revenue of the Ming Dynasty was less than 20 million stones. The Ming Dynasty has the wind of the Middle Ages, the wealth is in the people, and then look at how much tax the Qing Dynasty collected, look at the description of the living conditions of the people of the two dynasties by foreigners, the Ming Dynasty is the real wealth of the people, until later the Jurchen and the Rogues rose around, and the treasury was empty before it began to be taxed aggressively (the last two emperors of the Ming Dynasty), what about the Qing Dynasty? The Kangxi Dynasty has been fighting, presumably the treasury should have been emptied, but the three major campaigns of Wanli have emptied the full treasury after Zhang Juzheng's reform, so Kangxi's money will come, and the people will come!

It is said that Zhengde repairs the leopard room, look at Qianlong, that time spent no more money than Zhengde, or money from the people, there were many uprisings in the Ming Dynasty, but what about the Qing Dynasty, there were many more uprisings than the Ming Dynasty, but there were a lot of them recorded in the Qing history of the Manchu Qing Dynasty, not to mention that it was not written, is it that the people are living too comfortably, and they are too idle to rebel!! And if the Qing Dynasty did not get the surrender of the three miners in Shandong, it is estimated that they would not want to play with the Ming Dynasty in a hundred years, let alone enter the customs. There is also the Eight Banners slavery in the Qing Dynasty, the minions of the sound make me sick, what else is there in the Guannei, and the slaves in the circle immediately become slaves, what is this, the Manchu Qing Dynasty is a primitive slave dynasty!!

Therefore, if you want to compare the military, you may not be able to fight in the field, but it is absolutely no problem to defend the city, and if there is a good commander, then you can defeat the Qing army in the field; If compared with the economy, in its heyday, the Ming Dynasty was definitely above the Qing Dynasty, which cannot be seen from the tax payment, because the Ming Dynasty's tax collection is indeed less, it can be said that it is the least in all dynasties, but it is not that the economy is not good, but the ancestral rules and the local gentry conceal the land and population. The Ming Dynasty has about one-third of the world's **, which is documented, as for the Qing Dynasty, there is not much input not to say, but also a variety of outputs...