Two English choices, junior high school students, please tell me the reason, thank you

bar. He crossed the street at the traffic light and walked towards the police.

When you don't understand, you can think, it's always wrong, you can't stand at a traffic light.

And AT, which is originally followed by the preposition of the grounding point.

2.I think it's b

Before is generally used in the completion of the year (I don't know if I learned it in the third year of junior high school), this before must be followed by a before, that is to say, there must be two things, one in the front and one in the back.

Here's an example that isn't at completion.

I washed my shirt before I went to bed

And here, what exactly is going on before? No!

The goldfish don't remember what happened 3 minutes ago", and things appear in no order.

And ago means before, there should be no sequential events.

He crossed the road at a traffic light to the police station. at the traffic lights.

The second question is A.

1.He crossed the road at the traffic light and headed towards the police station.

Both options have only 'towards' in the second space'If you choose this word, then you don't have to think about it, just choose 'across on' or 'across at'It generally depends on what follows, here are the "traffic lights" - traffic lights. "on"-- on top of something.

You can't go to the traffic light. So choose 'at'。

The answer is A2"goldfish"It's a singular number, and you'll need to use it later"doesn't"

a a lot

She wore short skirts a lot of times at school, and she liked that way.

a shut

He slammed them shut and left, and he must have been very angry.

1. a

Solution: To join a party, an organization or a social group, use join. Whereas, take part in only participate in the event. Both whether and if can lead object clauses, but only whether and not are used together.

2.A solution: The answer to the question is to use the preposition to use the fixed usage, and the key to the lock is also used to, and the rest of the "of" is used of. reply is an intransitive verb that must be paired with the preposition to receive the object.

Because the to structure constitutes a noun part of the phrase.

2 A fixed match.

1. Choosing B is the difference between Whethere and IF. if has the meaning of whether or not. A preposition is required for join.

2. Select D, answer to the question is a fixed match. reply does not need to add to

A whether-led object clause , a negative clause can only be whether

D answer to the question is a fixed match. reply does not need to add to

Question 1: The test center is the difference between FEW and A FEW.

A few translates to one point, which means affirmatively.

few means that there is almost no negative meaning because there is but in front of it, so a should be chosen, which means negative.

According to the meaning,"The reporter asked the man a lot of questions, but he said very little. "So choose A for the second question: the test point is a conjunction.

Either write 30 meters' high, or with a conjunction, write 30-metre-high

When using conjunctions, treat 30-meter as a word, and modify high) to see your follow-up question: about is understood here as "about".

1. Choose A

The first empty many, a lot of can be, the key is the second empty one. According to the meaning,"The reporter asked the man a lot of questions, but he said very little. "few means negative, almost none, very little.

A few means some, expressing an affirmative tone.

2. There should be a definite article A in the AB option

As long as it is more than one meter, it is meters

The first one I feel the same way as you.

The second one is meters because it is 30m, plural

The meaning of the first question is different from that of a few, and the meaning of few is almost none, and it can be understood in this question that he didn't say anything ---.

A few means less, not no.

The second question is not very clear. Probably about+ noun and is form the system table structure.

There are a lot of things in English that are cold and cold.

1 The answer is whose, which is a relational pronoun that leads the definite clause and makes a definite clause in the definite clause modifies the lyrics

Regardless of whether the antecedent is a person or a thing, as long as it is a possessive relation, it can be used whosethis is the book whose cover is redThis is the book with a red cover.

Option c that can only be used as a definite subject, object, predicate, cannot be used as a definite False 2 The answer is d infinitive with a connecting adverb to be an object, which is equivalent to an object clause, option a is not in the right tense, and the past and future tense should be used.

Option B is more wrong, and the tense word order is incorrect.

Option c Clause Lacks Subject The tense is incorrect.

1.b It is not that only the antecedent is a person to use whose, but whose here means the song... The translation of this phrase is, what kind of songs do you like?

I love those songs with melodies that are beautiful.

Those who trust come and go, they don't know where to go.

1,The test is a definite clause,Translated into 、、、,As a definite sentence,You can only use whose,In fact, I once told students like this in the class,When the option is a noun before and after, choose whose directly,And here those refers to the above songs。 There is also the antecedent word of whose, which can be a person or a thing.

2. The simplest memory of this question is that the special question word is either added to the sentence or to do In this question, the sentence is added after the verb, and the object clause should be used in a declarative tone, b is directly excluded, and a tense is wrong, and c is wrong, so the answer d constitutes a special question word plus to do

1,.Choice B because the antecedent is those, which refers to songs, is a thing. It is common sense that C should be chosen, but pay attention to the lyrics that follow, which means that the lyrics are a noun and the B option whose means "who's" followed by a noun, so choose B

2.The answer is to go

Translation: The newcomers walked round and round. They don't know where to go.

Analysis: The main and subordinate are the same, and the tense is the same. ABC can be ruled out from three wills

The first question chooses b to understand according to the meaning of the only lyrics that are beautiful whose lyrics meet the meaning of the topic, that is not who is whose pro, whose can be substituted for people can be substituted for things, the second question choose d ah can directly exclude abc, because the main clause is in the past tense, and the clause should also be in the past tense or other tenses, but it is certainly not the general present tense like will, where to go, the to go in it is the infinitive expression, and the translation is to go** I hope it can help you

1.You have to know that whose can refer to people as well as things.

2.Definitely don't choose a, this is an object clause, and the tense of the main clause in front of it is didn'If t is judged to be in the past tense, then the tense of the clause must also be the corresponding tense of the past. So you can only choose D. is the usage of question word + infinitive.

whose is a definite clause that translates to the meaning of yes.

A Answer: I think the sentence is more comprehensive.

The first question is b, those are antecedents, and the relationship between them and lyrics is the affiliation, so we should choose whose. Note that whose is a relative pronoun and not a special interrogative word, and its antecedent can be a person or a thing. eg：

the room whose windows face south is comfortable to live in.

The second question is selected dThe underlined part is the object. If you choose a, you should change will to would, so that the main and subordinate clauses are consistent. Option D is "interrogative word + verb infinitive" as the object.

1.According to the meaning of the sentence! I love these songs, but what about those songs? It's the beautiful lyrics of these songs! Lyrics and the songs represented by Those in front of you are affiliations, so choose who!

2.Choose A. Because this is a clause, the word order of the declarative sentence is used, b is wrong! c is missing the subject, and the expression d d is wrong!

, whose leads the definite clause does not necessarily refer to people, it is equivalent to of which the lyrics

This is an abbreviated sentence because there was didn't, so it must be in the past tense, and the options with will are all wrong, so you can only choose d

The first question is b, mainly the following lyrics is a noun, so we should use whose, the second question is d is the object clause, the object clause is the word order, the word order is the statement, and the word order must be kept consistent, so the answers a, b, and c are excluded

It's like how to doIt's a truth.

That's how it should be.

Question 1. The antecedent is those, the clause is lyrics are beautiful, and the relative word depends on what components are missing in the clause, here lyrics is the subject in the clause, are is verb, and beautiful is the predicate. And whose is the definite term for lyrics, to which the table belongs.

Therefore, choose B. Not all those+who ^

Question 2 . The verb object clause guided by know, the word order should be declarative word order, i.e. special interrogative word + subject + predicate. So b and c are wrong, and the tense in option A is wrong, it should be where they would go, and the tense is the same.

Select d special question word + to do infinitive as the object.

1. whose lyrics which lyrics are more pleasant to write.

2. Object clause: introductory word + declarative sentence structure Choose A

1 b lyrics is a part of songs, not songs, here that can only refer to songs themselves, not "songs... And whose says "... "So use whose."

2 Option d The explanation downstairs is very detailed, but here it is necessary to pay attention to the tense, the object subordinate clause is in the past tense, and the clause should use a certain tense in the past. It can be seen from this that ABC does not match the topic, so D is chosen

1.Pick B. Because the antecedent of the definite clause acts as a certain sentence component in the definite clause, it can be used as: subject, object, definite, adverbial, etc. It can only be used as a definite sentence here. Of the four options, only Whose could act as a definite.

2.Pick D. It can be judged from the tense. didn't is in the simple past tense. d is "interrogative word + verb infinitive."'Structure.

1. A definite clause, the guide word uses whose, which means "**", and there is the noun "lyrics" after it, so it is necessary to use words that indicate the relationship of affiliation.

2. d b and c are obviously wrong, exclude, a tense is wrong, because the main clause is in the past tense, and the clause should be in the past tense, so d is chosen

Question 1. Choose b, the antecedent those is used as a definite clause in the definite clause. Hence the use of whose

In the second question, choose a, where to guide the object clause, and use the declarative word order.

1.b whose is a definite clause in a clause, which is a definite clause.

2.The tense of the d main clause is in the past tense. Therefore, neither a b c is correct.

cdone table "passive".

Do table "active".

For example: the boss made the workers do the work all day

The boss forced the workers to work all day.

he raised his voice to make himself heard.

He raised his voice so that he could be heard.

Can you understand English (as spoken)?

No, I only know a little English.

Call on and call at the same meaning, both"Visit""Access", but call on is followed by a noun or pronoun that indicates a person, and call at is followed by a word that indicates a place or place. Try to compare: