The pressure of studying does not help to achieve success this is a debate topic .

Causes a large number of brain cells to die and make it impossible to think.

First of all, through your question description, both sides of the debate are either under pressure to study and are not conducive to growth, or learning is stressful to be detrimental to growth. Since we haven't seen your full description of the debate, we can only discuss it separately.

First, high learning pressure is good for growth. Your point of view: high study pressure is not conducive to growth.

What is discussed here is whether high learning pressure is beneficial or not conducive to growth, so you can exaggerate the study pressure infinitely in order to prove the disadvantages of high study pressure, for example, there are many extreme examples of college entrance examination students jumping off buildings to commit suicide, it can be said that excessive pressure will seriously affect a person's mental and physical health, you are not healthy and depressed, how can you thrive? At the same time, you can attack the other party's example of stress, which is conducive to growth, by blurring the boundaries of the other party's stress, for example, ask the opponent's defense friend, is studying for 1 hour a day considered stressful? Is studying 8 hours a day stressful?

The average student has 8 hours a day in class) Is 12 hours a day a stressful time to study? How much time does it take to study a day when you fall to the ground to be considered stressful? Through this specific question, the other party cannot give a clear range of learning pressure to attack the other party.

Or do you think that studying under pressure is conducive to growth, so can we learn like crazy every day when we want to study like the 30-day countdown to the college entrance examination? This kind of extreme learning pressure to question the opponent's argument's point of view. Then force the opponent's defense friend to admit that too much study pressure is not conducive to growth, and then attack the opponent's defense friend The difference between excessive pressure and high pressure is **, so that the opponent's defense friend has nothing to say.

Second, the pressure of learning is not conducive to growth. Your point of view: high study pressure is not conducive to growth.

The comparison here is which is more detrimental to growth, high study pressure or low study pressure. So through this debate, we can get a subtext, whether it is the positive side of the learning pressure or the negative side of the learning pressure is small, in this debate is not conducive to growth, so the consensus that both sides must reach is that pressure is not conducive to growth, with this as the main premise of the debate. In this way, any example of low learning pressure is conducive to growth or high learning pressure is conducive to growth is not valid (of course, you should not mention the example that pressure is conducive to growth).

This kind of debate is the kind of typical debate that you say yours and I say me, and there is no intersection, because there is no contradiction between high learning pressure and low learning pressure is not conducive to growth. So the comparison is which of you is clear-minded, who is eloquent...