Debate tournament Learning a foreign language is not good or useless

It's really useless!

Learning English in China is not learning English, but learning English into Chinese. If you listen to English, you can't speak it but can use Chinese vernacular, and if you read English, you can't write but can use Chinese nonsense! It is equivalent to reviewing Chinese in English, and it is all something that Chinese has known for a long time, and it is a waste of life to repeat learning.

What is New Concept English, I should have learned, most of them learned "New Concept English", and they didn't know New Concept English at all, wouldn't they be those five Chinese characters?

Even if you study in a foreign country, when you go to China to speak English and talk about your major, your colleagues don't understand! If a colleague really uses English to understand the major in a foreign country, the Chinese language can't reflect it, and English is still useless.

For the rest, find it yourself.

False proposition!

We're not going to talk about whether learning English is useful or not?!!

Of course useful, English is present in the world.

Back to the first call.

Using communication tools, whether you say it is useless or not, is an important bridge for us to study all advanced technologies and ideas abroad! You say important or not.

It's not that it's too hard to discuss how hard it is for children to learn English, and this is not the point, so isn't it hard and time-taking for children to learn other subjects?

Don't always take the main idea of the public, and take the topic!

What we want to discuss is whether English should be compulsory, and use English as a criterion for children's admission to higher education and even employees' employment! It shouldn't be the sick criterion that as long as you can't speak English, you can't do it from head to toe!

Therefore, what we need to discuss is whether English should be pulled down from the "altar" and changed from mandatory to elective!

Is it bad to switch to a free elective? Isn't it more motivated to let people who are interested in need take the initiative to learn, isn't it easier to learn, down to children, up to the old people who want to learn it? If you have to sweep it all in one go, one size fits all, how many other disciplines have excellent results, how many professionals have been unknown since they failed English, and how many talents in professional fields have been lost by the country!

Sometimes I really suspect that the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China has formulated English as a compulsory subject in China's education, and these people who have taken the key entry threshold for examination and promotion (which is more important than the Han nationality) have deliberately used this to hinder our scientific and technological innovation on the road to national rejuvenation!

I've always felt that English is useless, even though I'm forced to type ABC every day.

I don't think it's useful to learn English, but to focus on whether it's worth learning English. There are a few points that can be referred to, the issue of input costs, and how much time it takes to learn English. People's energy is limited, and they spend a lot of time and energy on learning English, and they don't learn much else. If I'm really serious, I think philosophy, mental health, sports, all of these should be spent on time, and they are all beneficial.

Students should be given a choice as to whether English should really be so important compared to mathematics, physics and chemistry and their mother tongue.

Effect. Because there is no language environment, many people have learned English for n years, and when they see people, they can only say, "hello" and "goodbye". A few years after graduation, there are question marks over whether these can be remembered, which cannot but be said to be a huge waste.

It's a kind of work that gets twice the result with half the effort, and it's very hard to lose your life.

Language is meant for communication, unless you're in literature. I learned some English for daily communication, and I can do it with practical gestures and drawing. There's no need to spend time studying grammar and voice. Just understand the meaning.

The rest of the thought is to be added.

You go to your team with someone who speaks English very well but debates badly, and then when your team is about to lose, you jump out and say that it's enough to prove that English is useless.

You can search for relevant **, and it is important to analyze the debate topic first. This task is recommended to be determined by your team members through discussion and research, otherwise it is easy to be refuted by the other party during the debate.

Should underage be in a relationship.

This is really difficult, is this debate in Chinese or English?

In any case, first of all, it is best to make it clear that it is better to move to the place where learning English is not required.

Because there is no argument at all in this question, that is, the rights and wrongs of this question are too obvious. Everyone knows that it is important to speak English well, because most of the leading developed countries are English-speaking countries, and learning English will give you access to better information.

First of all, it should be clear:

English is just a tool, a text that records information.

You can learn it, you can use it, but it doesn't have to be.

When you learn English, do you encounter French, Russian, Spanish, Portuguese, you still can't communicate in English, it's time for you to take the time to learn these four languages? Of course not.

So you can still choose another language, or you don't want to learn it.

Why learn English? Is there a fundamental connection between your major and English?

No, why do you have to learn?

Another trick is to say that if it's not an English debate, ask the person with the worst spoken or pronounced English on the other side

Since we have to learn English, then we should also be able to use English very well, so please ask the other party (a few debates) to explain your arguments, what you just said, translate what his teammates said, what you said, (the last one is the safest, in case the other side is prepared) in English, please show your views to everyone with practical actions. Eighty percent of them can't say it, so you say that if English is so good, why can't you use it well after 9 years of learning? Since I have learned but I can't use it, what is the difference between this and not learning, the other party has proved our point of view with practical actions.

If, you think this is too bad, you can tell the other person that although the opponent can't speak in English, maybe he can use French or Russian? Maybe that's not a deal.

Yes, if China wants to achieve rejuvenation, it must have the world in mind, and learning English is one of the manifestations of having the world in mind.

Of course, it is not an English debate tournament that tests both English proficiency and critical thinking skills, and it is not a master's way of doing things just by speaking English quickly and speaking a lot.

Many people will think that as long as they speak fast and speak more in the English debate competition, the results will be better, but in fact, because of the limitations of the level of both participants, if one side is not even good at the most basic English, let alone any debate, it is natural that the side that speaks fast and speaks more has an advantage.

However, when both sides have about the same level of English, the advantages of critical thinking and logical skills become apparent. Whether it is an English or Chinese debate competition, the basic requirements of critical thinking ability are the same, first of all, it is necessary to be organized and logical, secondly, to be able to grasp its main strengths and identify the weaknesses and shortcomings of the opponent to make use of them, and finally to have a strong flexibility and adaptability, to be able to adapt to the ever-changing situation on the field, and to adjust the strategy according to the situation at any time to ensure their own advantages.

And if you meet all of these requirements, English is just a way to show your thinking process.

For the judges of the debate competition, they will definitely not only consider whether they are in English, speak fast and speak more, nor will they only evaluate through logical thinking ability, but will combine the two to see which side is best to match English ability and critical thinking ability to achieve the best effect, and the balance of the judges will be tilted in favor of this side.

English debate is indeed a great test of English proficiency and thinking ability, many people are logically confused when speaking Chinese, such a situation is really not suitable for participating in any kind of debate, English and Chinese are the same.