Do you think fragmented reading really works?

Of course, it works, and I like this way of reading very much, so I don't waste time and I can learn knowledge, so why not do it.

I think if you like to read, it's also possible because it saves you a lot of time. And if you put your mind to it, you can still learn a lot of knowledge, don't be aimless, that kind of reading is the most ineffective.

It didn't work at all. I do this a lot, in the car, in the toilet, etc., and then I forget it, I can't remember anything, and it affects you to do other things.

I think it depends on the preference, effective or ineffective is also divided into people, some people like this way of reading, some people don't. It's entirely up to you.

In the past, I didn't support fragmented reading, but then I changed my opinion, because for people with a purpose, even this way of reading can learn a lot.

I have a friend who takes a book with him to the toilet, he is a typical fragment of culture reading, and I usually chat with him and I don't find that he is better than others, maybe I know a little more.

I don't like this method of reading, I feel like I can't read a book by taking a car or doing something else, it's just the so-called single-mindedness, I don't know if other people can learn something.

This is the same as studying, some people have to memorize English words on the bus, but it is not necessarily how good his grades are, and some people may not be able to learn anything by reading this book every day.

The public says that the public is reasonable, the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable, don't look at others using this method, you also use it, that will affect your own life, who has nothing to do to walk and ride the car and read a book.

With the development of society, people's life rhythm is getting faster and faster, many people pay attention to efficiency, and many things want to be completed in a short time, because they think that a long time is a waste of time. In the traditional way of reading, it is generally a more systematic way to read a famous book, read a history book, and so on. But nowadays many people don't have such a lot of patience and always hope to get these things done in a short period of time.

Therefore, there is also fragmented reading, the so-called fragmented reading, which is to use scattered time to carry out a small amount of short reading. So, does this way really work?

1. How is the difference between the two methods compared to the traditional way?

In the traditional way, it is generally more systematic, read a book completely, so that you can understand the author's thoughts more completely, and can also experience the truth and connotation more deeply. For example, when reading a famous book, only by reading it from beginning to end and savoring it slowly can you understand the meaning of what the author wants to express. If you just cut out some synopsis, or browse quickly, you can't understand the meaning at all, at most, it's like reading a storybook, knowing the plot, and it's difficult to achieve the real purpose of reading.

So reading books can't be considered a fast food culture.

Second, real reading is different from reading popular **.

If it's the current kind of city**, or fantasy**, it doesn't matter what kind of way, anyway, everyone is here to see the storyline, and they don't need to understand, what a profound philosophy, but if it's a more formal book, especially if you're tired of studying, you should still read it seriously, systematically, and completely, add your own thoughts, and think about it seriously, so that you can learn something. Allow yourself to improve.

I think that fragmented reading is very useful to help us accumulate knowledge effectively and thus have a better future.

It is useful, and by reading in this way, it can strengthen memory, and then the reading process will not cause particularly much stress on the individual.

Fragmented reading is still useful, now adult time is precious, fragmented reading can make good use of each time gap, as long as you can concentrate on reading, fragmented reading will also have a lot of benefits for yourself.

It's really useful, this method of memorization is much easier to use, and it can help us remember a lot of things, and many people like to use this method.

Pros: While fragmented reading is convenient for using fragmented time to read information, it also takes up a lot of people's time for deep reading. Fragmented reading also makes people in the hall form a kind of inert dependence, accustomed to obtaining knowledge fragments through searching, asking questions or interacting, and it is not easy to form a deep, critical, recessive, and systematic knowledge system, which poses a challenge to people's knowledge system, way of thinking, rational thinking ability, logical thinking ability and judgment ability.

People who are not very capable of thinking can easily be deceived by demagogic headlines, inflammatory statements, exaggerated facts, and photographs after PS synthesis.