In the era of fragmented reading, will you still buy paper books?

I won't buy it, paper books are too fragile, and a book will be ruined if you are not careful, and it is much easier to read online, and you can also get information, so why do you have to go through paper books.

No, now that more and more materials are available online, and I can see most of the books on the market on my phone, I don't feel the need to buy them.

I can buy it, even if I buy an e-book online, but I still prefer the feeling of being able to circle and mark the book.

I haven't bought a physical book for a long time, and now I'm so busy at work, how can I have time to read, I can only read through fragmentary time, and I have bought a few physical books when I go to work, but I don't have time to read them.

I'll buy it, after all, no matter how delicious instant noodles are, they can't replace serious rice, not to mention that the inheritance of history is not obtained through paper books.

Physical books are too bulky, if you want to read books when you go out to travel, you have to bring books, which is too unnecessary, as long as you can **one app in your mobile phone**hundreds of books, easy and convenient, of course, you will not buy physical books again.

The famous writer Wang Meng said, "Reading is not only a means to acquire knowledge, but also a kind of enjoyment and an attitude towards life." "I think it's still very necessary to buy a physical book, and I really enjoy the moment when my fingertip runs across the page.

Isn't paper books also printed after having documents, just get them online, and there's no need to buy physical books.

Paper books are very pleasing to the eye, and they cannot be replaced by e-books.

The square stool style of fragment reading is actually a process of dismantling and refining the core content and knowledge system after finding the content, and then processing, combining, and innovating into our own. In our busy pace of life, many people have to work during the day, and even have to work overtime at night, and the whole time is rare, so making good use of fragmented time is also an important way for us to learn to talk about imperial habits.

Recently, I have been reading Mr. Zhu Yu's series of books "Let the Classroom Speak". From the teaching of ancient poetry to the teaching of reading to the teaching of composition, it feels very systematic and in-depth. These three books are related, even between chapters.

Reading Mr. Zhu Yu's book is like chatting with an old friend, cordial and simple. Reading the whole book can see Mr. Zhu's teaching ideas more clearly and get a richer reading experience. Being able to see the sea.

Fragmented reading is short, often fast, not impressive enough, and not deep enough to understand the author. Reading WeChat*** and reading magazines is this kind of reading experience. But more of the author's point of view can be learned in a short time.

With the development of society, people's life rhythm is getting faster and faster, many people pay attention to efficiency, and many things want to be completed in a short time, because they think that a long time is a waste of time. In the traditional way of reading, it is generally a more systematic way to read a famous book, read a history book, and so on. But nowadays many people don't have such a lot of patience and always hope to get these things done in a short period of time.

Therefore, there is also fragmented reading, the so-called fragmented reading, which is to use scattered time to carry out a small amount of short reading. So, does this way really work?

1. How is the difference between the two methods compared to the traditional way?

In the traditional way, it is generally more systematic, read a book completely, so that you can understand the author's thoughts more completely, and can also experience the truth and connotation more deeply. For example, when reading a famous book, only by reading it from beginning to end and savoring it slowly can you understand the meaning of what the author wants to express. If you just cut out some synopsis, or browse quickly, you can't understand the meaning at all, at most, it's like reading a storybook, knowing the plot, and it's difficult to achieve the real purpose of reading.

So reading books can't be considered a fast food culture.

Second, real reading is different from reading popular **.

If it's the current kind of city**, or fantasy**, it doesn't matter what kind of way, anyway, everyone is here to see the storyline, and they don't need to understand, what a profound philosophy, but if it's a more formal book, especially if you're tired of studying, you should still read it seriously, systematically, and completely, add your own thoughts, and think about it seriously, so that you can learn something. Allow yourself to improve.

I think that fragmented reading is very useful to help us accumulate knowledge effectively and thus have a better future.

It is useful, and by reading in this way, it can strengthen memory, and then the reading process will not cause particularly much stress on the individual.

Fragmented reading is still useful, now adult time is precious, fragmented reading can make good use of each time gap, as long as you can concentrate on reading, fragmented reading will also have a lot of benefits for yourself.

It's really useful, this method of memorization is much easier to use, and it can help us remember a lot of things, and many people like to use this method.

I'm sorry, I really don't think fragments and reading can be put together, fragments of time to see things can only be browsed, even glanced, can't sink down to experience, can't think with the heart, that's not called reading.

The pros and cons are already answered in the question: you can quickly obtain information, such as a certain sudden current news (Weibo), such as some marginal, unknown information (some blogs, Guohu), or give you a direction to know what kind of information is needed and to what extent (Zhihu); However, it can't make people think, it can't make people calm, it can't make people really have connotation, it can only seem a little forced. I'm not saying that you have to read a tome, but you can't read it without a certain depth, and you can't read it without thinking.

Fragmented browsing inserts a few minutes of fragmented time, destroying the orientation and ability to read, and you will gradually find yourself playing with these fragments even if you have a large chunk of time, as the subject has already described. Here's why: fragmented browsing inherently requires less thinking and more receiving, and the result is silly.

If you don't think so, it's better to close your eyes and save your eyes from being poisoned by the screen.