Have I solved the question of whether the world is materialistic or idealistic 40

I don't know what this has to do with materialism.

I suggest that before you want to discuss those two topics, please read carefully what is materialism and what is idealism.

How do you confirm"I am me"Very simple.

You see others, others are different from yourself, and they are established"Me"The concept exists.

It's a mindset of simple contrasts and subjective observations.

For example, how do you know if a girl is your tablemate? Because someone else is not, her appearance, attitude, voice, and so on are different from others, causing you to distinguish that she is different from others.

That's why I've always despised Disney cartoons, which are actually animalizing humans. After a different look, the essence is still human, so what? Now the aliens of the so-called science fiction movies are the same, trying to cover up the essence with appearance, it is always impossible.

In addition, as for what to copy the body, I think your question is too narrow, and after a long time, it is still a problem of yourself and others.

Under the premise of determinism and mechanical materialism, you and your copy are not the same no matter how you reproduce. Because there is a gap between your replica and your memory. And the concept of the original me is ridiculous.

What do you mean by the original you? Born you? You have not been interfered with or influenced in any way?

That kind of thing doesn't exist at all, okay? The essence of your birth is because of your parents, the presence of others. How could there be a so-called"Originally"?

And in everyone's eyes, in everyone's subjective world, you are a different existence, you are different.

Do you know what the eternal theme between humans and humans is?

Communicate. Because there is no way to share thoughts and memories or experiences.

So communication is needed.

Is it up to you to decide what you think of yourself? If the whole world says you're ugly, do you think you'll think you're handsome?

Don't forget the story of a saint's mother, who was falsely reported that her son had killed three times, so she fled behind the door.

Subjectivity and communication, as well as understanding, are very rich and very important things.

Don't underestimate it.

Every living being has a perspective, and the strong consciousness is the invisible "self". I also asked questions about how the "I" intervened in the shell, and it was not complete.

Now I have to ask myself, does this world (the universe) need "me" to observe and appreciate it (the meaning of existence)? Does the observation have to be continuous (a matter of life and death)?

Before we were born, strictly speaking before consciousness was created, the world did not exist for us, and it can be said that there was no time and space. But it was later proven that it existed, which shows that the consciousness of "I" is discontinuous, but history can be connected in other ways. And all of these knowable activities take place within the limits of our memory.

After I lose my memory forever, "I" no longer exists, and other "mes" can criticize you for being idealistic, but in the general trend, the whole earth is going to die, and the universe is going to die, and this process is no longer long, because there is no observer. You can currently imagine the concept of dark time millions of times the lifetime of the universe, which seems impossible.

The universe should be part of a living being, with consciousness at a higher latitude, and their perceptual organs and analytical consciousness also operate at a higher latitude, and that continuous "I" may be delivered to any latitude and any carrier.

I don't know if you've ever heard a story like this:

In a temple, the old monk asked the little monk as follows:

Q: Who are you?

A: I am me!

Q: Who's in me?

Answer: I'm in you!

Q: Who knew you were in me?

A: I know I'm me!

Judging from the answers:"I am me"This I am a physical me! On behalf of the society as seen by me - Ellerere!

I'm in you"I am one of a kind"Ego", with ** as the boundary, the inner self is a private world!

I know"I'm in control"Me", this me"Know"Everything that is spiritually me, is called"The real me"!

People are born without knowing it"Me"Yes"Me", because there are others, only to know that there is one"Me"The existence of the world shows that the world is as it is, and there is not"You"Where did it come from?"Me"

If you were the only one in the world, and there was no one, would you still say me? It's like it's never dark in the world, you say it is"During the day", does it make any sense?

Don't overcomplicate the problem, why bother drilling something very simple? For example, if I look in the mirror and see a person in the mirror, how do I know that the person in the mirror is me? Because anyone with a brain knows that the person in the mirror is me!

He has no mind, no soul, but he follows my mind and soul to act, so why bother with it

Haha, it reminds me of the story of Zhuang Zhou's dream butterfly!

If you admit that you are made up of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, etc., or you know that your appearance, personality, etc., are caused by genes and acquired environment, then you say that you are materialistic.

If you think that you came out of nowhere, then of course it is spiritual.

I don't think the questioner's question has anything to do with materialism or idealism, but whether materialism or idealism solves the problem of matter first or consciousness first.

Kant said that the use of reason to force the understanding of these unconditional essential things in the world will inevitably lead to the contradiction of the two laws, idealism, and materialism are the right and the opposite, and we can't prove both at all, but both of them stand on reason.

Probably the best way is to unify the main and negative topics of materialism and idealism into a joint topic, the world is neither materialistic nor idealistic, so it is both materialistic and idealistic, and there is no contradiction at all. (Don't think I'm dualistic, I'm not separating the material from the spiritual).

You are an idealist, and as you can see from your paragraph about the perspective in the painting, for example, if there is an apple on the table, the idealist will think: I see the apple and perceive its existence, then it does exist, otherwise there would be no apple on the table. And materialism would think:

Whether I see the apple on the table or not, it's real.

Your question is, "Have I solved the question of whether the world is materialistic or idealistic?" "Your question is too big to ask whether your own opinion is materialistic or idealistic.

I think you're taking too many things too seriously.

Whether it is materialistic or idealistic.

What's the point?

You say"Yesterday I dreamed that the number of people with my problem was 17, and today it came true"

All right. Even if it's true. So what do you want to express?

What is the answer you want?

You know, you're just yourself.

See your words among hundreds of millions of netizens. And said the answer you wanted.

It's almost impossible.

In fact, you should know your answer.

You also know that you really can't find what you're looking for.

It's just, I think, with your thoughts. And then go on.

Fear. You're left with just yourself.

I am not generated by me.

The world is selfless.

Every thought that arises.

There must be the power to generate this thought.

and the reason that gave rise to this thought.

It can be seen that the relative can exist.

Do you know you're Arere?

That's because your will is manifested in Arere.

Arere is the manifestation of your will.

If you put the consciousness of me out of the appearance of Ellerere.

That one: I exist.

Everything, or nothing.

A living being, as long as it has the ability to perceive and has a nervous thinking system, then. You'll find yourself.

Actually, I think, about how to know yourself, the question. Actually, it's a matter of biology, not a matter of idealistic philosophy!

Idealistic philosophy is only used to compare things. The more confused I became,

Since the day of the birth of mankind, there has been materialism and idealism.

This problem is permanent, it is not temporary. Unless humanity perishes, there will be no more such problems, idealism and materialism are two extremes, and in life they are among us and indispensable.

Therefore, we cannot simply say that the world is idealistic or materialistic. It's coexisting.

The question is contradictory. So everything is contradictory.

I don't exist.

If you think I exist, then you don't exist.

If it is assumed that I exist and you exist, then he does not exist.

If all people are assumed to exist, then existence does not exist.

People who say that others are naïve can turn around and leave without talking, everyone has an inner world, and everyone is also from contradictions and thinking struggles!

You are you, I am me, I am you, you are me, I am not you, you are not me, I am you, you are not me. You are me, I am not you.

Not thorough enough, in fact everything is based on empty !

Human instinct and self-awareness.

You don't know how your brain works.

The brain is nothing more than an ordinary organ.

It's so naïve that there are more than 100 million words of philosophical material on this.

You still look at Freud's "The Interpretation of Dreams" and Schopenhauer's "As the Appearance of the World and the Will", which have detailed records and theories

Brain neurons as well as brain CPUs, etc.

I heard that our world is just a dream of Brahma and that when he wakes up, the world will be destroyed!

In fact, when we dream, we also create a world! Rattle.

Lu Zi understands that for details, please refer to Wulin Transfer

Existence is reasonable, which belongs to idealism.

Being is reasonable" is a philosophical saying that is often misunderstood today as "everything that exists is reasonable", from Hegel. The full translation is: Everything that is rational is real; Everything that is realistic is rational.

Preface to Hegel's Principles of the Philosophy of Law).

According to Hegel, the origin of the universe is the Absolute Geist. It has everything in itself, then externalizes the natural world, human society, spiritual science, and finally returns to itself on a higher level. Therefore, whatever is on this trajectory is rational (vernünftig), that is, necessarily what will emerge and be realistic (wirklich).

The reverse is also true. This is the original meaning of "existence is reasonable". Countless phenomena conform to a certain "reasonable" and have their own reasons, but they are not necessarily reasonable in the ordinary context, that is, "right", such as crime.

To understand the true meaning of this sentence, it is necessary to understand the "theory of ideas" in the historical environment of the time, which is about reality, existence, and philosophy, rationality, and truth. However, to think that as long as it exists, it is reasonable or correct, this is completely out of context.

Being is rational is the theory of objective idealism, which means that the original principle of the universe is the absolute spirit (reason), which has everything in itself, and then externalizes the natural world, human society, spiritual science, and finally returns to itself at a higher level.

Therefore, whatever is on this trajectory is reasonable (the abbreviation of "rational"), that is, it is inevitable and realistic. From the preface to Hegel's Principles of the Philosophy of Law.

This world is materialistic, and idealism is only a state of existence.

Human beings have life and death, and when they come into the world, they have to rely on the natural material world for the physiological needs of life. Life to death is a process of natural life phenomena, and this process carries the subjective natural law and the idealistic shadow of fate. Human beings continue to pass on from generation to generation, and they are only passers-by in the natural world, which is the natural existence of the objective material world and the materialistic essence of the cosmic world.

Human consciousness is interested in the material world and competing for material resources, and only a materialistic common public ownership system is the hope of the human communist society.

This question has been answered in Buddhism for a long time. "The wind moves or the flag moves", this is materialism. "Actually, it's heartbeat" is idealism.

Philosophy emphasizes the unity of opposites and sees the essence through phenomena. So this world is not absolute materialism, nor is it absolute idealism.

Whether it is "mind" or "matter", it is constantly moving and changing. The "materialism" at this moment, the "idealism" at the moment. These two alternate due to changes in environment and time.

The most common Taiji diagram in life fully explains this.

The history of philosophy is reasoning, the process of recommending and recommending human beings, nature, biology, physics, animals and people, taking place in their own ways, and there must be factors in their changes, internal causes are transformed, there is a reality in the recommendation, from the expression, the surface and the heart have the law of non-return, philosophy is to support things, how to form the changes of people, in the struggle, contradictions, life must have many aspects of inference, reasoning combined with history, the present era, society, changes and more changes and more turns, so it is the history of materialist dialectics, the concept of idealism is abstract dogmatism, It is a congenital thing, regardless of reality, facts, so there must be philosophy to understand the path of life, the changes in life, to understand why human beings are recommended to be born, society, and why people live.