Is this idealism or materialism? What is the difference between idealism and materialism?

The West calls such people skeptics, and we are used to calling them agnosticists, and this argument itself is only an epistemological point of view, and does not involve the question of idealism or materialism, but the philosophical end point of any agnostic is idealism, which is covered in the works of Marx and Engels.

My teacher once explained it this way: I said that you are a pig, so you are a pig, this is idealism; And because you are a pig, you are a pig, this is materialism.

You can judge by the above criteria.

Joke :)

This is a necessary condition for studying philosophy, and we must be curious and skeptical in everything. In addition, to send you a sentence, it is more similar:

Don't be afraid of your own unique ideas, because our current knowledge was also doubted in the past

This is a scientific rigor that has nothing to do with idealistic materialism.

There are no absolutes! This is the theory of relativity!

When I was walking alone in the wilderness, it was thundering and raining outside.

Materialist: Oh, it's raining, keep your body down, away from buildings and trees, and avoid being struck by lightning. Then be cautious about the advance of the lack of town.

Idealist: I haven't done anything bad, don't be afraid, the thunder will only split many unrighteous people, so I can move forward boldly with confidence.

Materialism acknowledges that the world is knowable, but denies the existence of an all-knowing One (God). Materialism recognizes that the above argument contains contradictions, but does not try to resolve this contradiction, but admits it, believing that everything contains contradictions, and the more contradictions there are, the more real they are.

First, the connotation is different

Objective idealism.

is one of the two basic forms of idealistic philosophy. It holds that there existed independently of an objective spirit (idea, reason, absolute spirit) before the emergence of the material world and human beings.

Absolute ideas, etc.), this objective spirit, in the course of its development, gave rise to the material world.

Subjective idealism or subjective idealism.

is a philosophical theory. It proposes that the mind of a subject, such as its feelings, experiences, consciousness, ideas, and/or will, is the source and basis of the emergence and existence of things in the world, and that everything in the external world is derived from these subjective spirits, the manifestation of these subjective spirits.

Second, the arguments are different

Objective idealism recognizes the objective world independent of human consciousness, emphasizing that the "spiritual ontology" as the original of the world is endogenous to the objective world itself, and this "spiritual ontology" invariably carries the meaning of "the law of things", which makes objective idealism often unconsciously move towards nature and objectivity.

Subjective idealism sees everything in the external world as the manifestation and product of the subjective spirit of the self. In fact, it is to believe that everything in the external world is determined by the subjective spirit of each self, and without the subjective spirit of each conscious self, there will be no things in the external world, that is, the objective world depends on the subjective spirit to exist.

Here it is:Materialism.

Persist in proceeding from reality in everything, seeking truth from facts, making subjectivity conform to objectivity, and achieving the unity of subjectivity and objective concrete history; Pay attention to the role of consciousness, establish correct consciousness, and overcome wrong consciousness.

The law is universal, and everything follows its inherent law in the process of its movement, change and development; Laws are objective, not subject to human will, and can neither be created nor destroyed.

The law must be followed, not violated; People can take the initiative.

On the basis of understanding and grasping the laws, we should use the laws according to the conditions and forms under which the laws take effect, and transform the objective world.

The best answer to this question lies in the theory of practice and contradiction in the first volume of Mao Xuan. The article explains that materialist dialectics is of a class character and is exclusively for the proletariat. Of course, the petty bourgeoisie in modern society is increasing day by day, and they begin to doubt whether materialist dialectics can be used by other classes other than the proletariat, so some people think that since the class nature of the dialectic of stupid things is to serve the proletariat, can the opposing idealism correspond to the theory of service to the bourgeoisie?

Therefore, many people have begun to bias the view and elimination in favor of this answer.

But in the theory of contradiction, there is a decisive problem, two worldviews. Idealistic materialism is actually the main form of the two world views, and today's materialism is no longer an idea exclusively for a specific class. Rather, it is another perspective and perspective that can be used for human exploration of the future exploration of science.

The basic manifestation is that the idealistic world view is based on the subjective will of people, while the materialist world view is the result of practice and the observation of the development of things is the starting point. Therefore, scientists are also divided into two types: materialism and idealism. For the exploration of nature, the study of natural science is usually materialist, I think that scientists such as Newton and Einstein were materialists when they were young, but after old age, due to the limitations of human exploration ability, they speculated too much, so they became idealists, and the theory of relativity is actually idealism, including Hawking, etc., their characteristics are usually based on their own cognitive experience as a standard and then guess the larger space things.

Start your research with this definition. Just like scientists say that the sun is a sphere, but so far there is no evidence to prove that the sun is a sphere, because the inside of the sun cannot be detected at all, maybe the inside of the sun is a high-speed rotating black hole vortex is not known, after all, the distance between the nine planets and the sun belongs to the outer circle of the sun. So it's a question of whether you define first or later.

Idealistic materialism is like that. Therefore, as pragmatics, of course, we must choose materialism.

1. This statement is wrong.

2. Materialism and idealism, agnosticism and agnosticism, as two pairs in philosophy, are independent of two different aspects of the basic problem of philosophy (that is, the relationship between thinking and being), and there is no direct relationship between the two, but there is a cross-relationship. That is, idealistic philosophy can be agnosticism or agnosticism, but materialist philosophy is mostly an agnostic philosophy.

3. The basic problems of philosophy and their contents.

The basic question of philosophy has two aspects: the first is the question of what is the origin of mind and being, consciousness and matter. There have always been two fundamental differences in this aspect, and thus two camps, two basic factions, and two opposing lines have been formed in philosophy, namely, idealism and materialism.

All philosophical schools that believe that consciousness is primary and matter is secondary, that is, consciousness precedes matter, matter depends on consciousness for existence, and matter is the product of consciousness belongs to idealism; Any philosophical school that believes that matter is primary and consciousness is secondary, that is, matter precedes consciousness and consciousness is the product of matter belongs to materialism.

Another aspect of the fundamental problem of philosophy is the question of the identity of thinking and being. The vast majority of philosophers, including materialist philosophers and some idealist philosophers, have affirmed this aspect. However, materialism and idealism have different solutions to this problem in principle.

Materialism is based on the recognition of the objective existence of the material world and its laws, and the recognition of thinking as a reflection of existence, and the recognition of the world as knowable; Idealism, on the other hand, regards the objective world as the product of thinking and spirit, and believes that knowing the world is the self-knowledge of the spirit. There were also philosophers such as DHume and I

Kant, who denied the possibility of knowing the world, or denied the possibility of knowing the world thoroughly, were agnostics in the history of philosophy.

You remember one of the most fundamental differences: idealism is a single, static, isolated, one's way of looking at things according to one's own ideas, without considering the actual situation. Materialism considers the development and change of the problem, and considers the problem according to the original appearance of things and the actual situation.

The fundamental difference between materialist epistemology and idealistic epistemology is that the former adheres to the line of knowledge from objects to sensations and thoughts, while the latter adheres to the line of understanding from thoughts and sensations to objects.

1. Difference in meaning.

Dialectical materialist epistemology is an important part of dialectical materialism, which is a scientific epistemic theory about human cognition, cognitive ability, epistemic form, epistemic process and epistemic truth.

It is first and foremost agnosticism, which holds that the objective material world is knowable. People are able to understand not only the phenomena of the material world, but also their essence through them. Marxist philosophy is a doctrine on the first, essence and laws of cognition, which adheres to the viewpoint of reflection theory, and believes that the objective material world that exists independently of human consciousness is the object and source of cognition, and cognition is the reflection of the subject on the object, and it is the subjective reflection of the objective world.

2. Differences in other aspects.

1. Materialist epistemology is a reflection theory, and idealistic epistemology is a priori (innate experience) theory. In other words, materialist epistemology holds that knowledge is acquired, not innate.

2. Materialism believes that true knowledge comes from action, while idealism believes that knowledge is nothing but inner reflection.

3. Materialist epistemology is agnosticism, while some idealistic epistemologies are agnosticism, denying the possibility of knowing the world.