Without any license plate on the high speed, a four car rear end collision was caused

Updated on society 2024-05-01
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    You're in the last position, so you're definitely responsible: failing to keep a safe distance and causing a rear-end collision that caused you to fail to brake in an emergency.

    Now the problem is: the first three cars are putting the blame on you, but you think that the first and second cars were the first to have the accident, and you and the third car were the second accident.

    As long as you follow the third car all the time, rather than the third car stopping for a while, you don't have to be afraid, because continuous rear-end accidents in motion are generally determined as follows: the first car is not responsible; The second car is responsible for the loss of the first car and its own front; The third car is responsible for the loss of the rear of the second car and its own front; The fourth car is responsible for the loss of the rear of the third car and its own front, and so on.

    If the first three cars want to put the blame on you, they have to speak in unison, saying that they stopped for enough time before you crashed into it, I guess they didn't do it, right? In addition, if you are overloaded, or the truck fails the safety level inspection (mainly brakes), it is not good for you and will increase the responsibility.

    The third car may have actually been hit twice: you rear-end it first, and then it hit the car in front of you. Otherwise, he's a veteran: that proves that he braked the car, but you rear-ended it and pushed it into the car in front of you.

    As for not being able to see the brake prints, it's not good for you. There is no brake mark, which means that the tire is not locked, the car with ABS will not lock, and your truck, you can only say that you are not ruthless when you step on the brakes, which is improper or too late to take measures.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    If the vehicle is rear-ended, the rear car is fully responsible, if you are the front car is not listed, you are also responsible, if it is the rear car, then it goes without saying, the crime must be added to the first degree.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The standard for dividing the responsibility of the four-vehicle rear-end collision is to determine whether the parties bear the primary responsibility, equal responsibility, secondary responsibility or no responsibility according to the role played by the party's behavior in the occurrence of the road traffic accident and the severity of the fault.

    Article 60 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents The traffic management department of the public security organ shall determine the responsibility of the parties according to the role played by the party's behavior in the occurrence of the road traffic accident and the severity of the fault. (1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, full responsibility shall be borne by the party; (2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, they shall bear primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault; (3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, neither party is liable. If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The responsibility for the rear-end collision of more than a dozen vehicles at the highway shall be determined by the traffic management department after conducting an inquest and inspection according to the situation at the scene of the bridge collapse accident.

    Article 60 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents.

    The traffic management department of the public security organ shall, according to the role of the party's behavior in the occurrence of a road traffic accident and the severity of the fault, determine the responsibility of the party.

    (1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, full responsibility shall be borne by the party;

    (2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, they shall bear primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault;

    (3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, neither party is liable. If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.

    Article 61.

    In any of the following circumstances, the party shall bear full responsibility: (1) fleeing after a road traffic accident; (2) Intentionally destroying or fabricating scenes or destroying evidence.

    Where parties abandon their vehicles and flee or abscond and hide in order to evade pursuit of legal responsibility, if there is evidence showing that the other parties are also at fault, responsibility may be appropriately reduced, but where there is evidence at the same time showing that the fleeing party has the circumstances in item (2) of the first paragraph, it is not to be mitigated.

    Article 60 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents.

    The traffic management department of the public security organ shall determine the responsibility of the party according to the role of the party's behavior in the occurrence of road traffic accidents and the severity of the fault.

    (1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, full responsibility shall be borne by the party;

    2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault, they shall bear the primary responsibility, the same responsibility and the secondary responsibility;

    (3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, neither party is liable. If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If it is in the driving lane and there is no stop sign placed 50 meters behind the car, then the car in front of it will be at least 50% responsible. If it's on a ramp, then your responsibility is all there is to it.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Look at the order of investigation surveillance video, dash cam, multi-vehicle rear-end collision is certainly not in the same time period, there is a sequence.

Related questions
8 answers2024-05-01

It's absolutely unreasonable for a fast food restaurant to ask you to pay.

11 answers2024-05-01

No. The components of an electric motorcycle include: electric drive and control system, mechanical systems such as drive transmission, and working devices to complete established tasks. The electric drive and control system is the core of electric vehicles, and it is also the biggest difference that distinguishes it from vehicles driven by internal combustion engines. >>>More

21 answers2024-05-01

It depends on the size of the charging current.

1. The battery generally retains more than 20% of the battery, and the chemical conversion efficiency of the battery is about 50% when charging, and the power needs to be increased by 150%*80% when the battery is fully charged. >>>More

16 answers2024-05-01

Vehicles without a driver's license and without a license shall be given administrative penalties. In the event of a traffic accident, the traffic department shall determine the responsibility and compensate according to the liability. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-01

A lot of people are looking for a teacher... I'm down here.