Churchill s golden toilet was stolen, and it is said that the organizer s security is not in place,

Of course, the possibility of self-theft by the guards is not ruled out, because such a precious collection, no matter how careless the security personnel are, he will have cluesBut the loss of this collection is obvious, and the thief is well aware of the topography and security of this museum. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that insiders provided him with information and intelligence. So it's possible that this was a theft that was both inside and out.

This time, the ** toilet used by Churchill was stolen, which also attracted the attention of many people in the world。Of course, everyone is not concerned about the toilet itself, but more importantly, about the history he has witnessed. Because this toilet is the toilet used by Churchill, mainly because Churchill is so famous that it has a great influence on the British people and the people of the world.

And in the 2nd World War, he played an indelible role. Without his presence, Britain might have become a German colony by now.

So we didn't focus on this toilet, but Churchill used it, so it gave him a lot of added value。Of course, although his appearance is also very exaggerated, it is made of 16k**. Of course, this itself means that its value is also very valuable, and it is inevitable that some insiders will see the intention of making money.

Together with the other thieves, steal the collection. However, the thief has been caught by the British **, he is a man in his 60s. This was also a big surprise to everyone.

This is even more proof of how bad the security measures in the museum are, and how a person in his 60s, who is not very good at mobility, can steal such a valuable collectionOf course, this does not rule out the result of internal personnel and external cooperation. Therefore, the final result needs to be further interrogated, and if there is a phenomenon of self-theft, this museum must be more severely rectified.

If there is a theft of items, the suspect must be the supervisor first, and it is possible that the security party will steal it by himself.

Churchill's toilet was stolen, and I heard that it was committed by a 66-year-old man, and there is a possibility that the guards stole it.

This is possible, because it is impossible for such a large collection to be stolen without the help of insiders.

I feel that this is very possible, and his toilet is ** built, only his own people know.

There is this possibility, after all, their methods of committing crimes are very convenient, and the purpose of committing crimes is also very suspicious.

It is also possible because the custodian still has a chance to steal such a valuable item, and the custodian guards this thing every day, so he knows when it is most appropriate to steal.

This still needs to ask why, this is ** made, who doesn't want to get it, you don't have to sell it if you get it.

Because the Churchill King toilet is very expensive and valuable, it will be stolen.

What will be stolen is a treasure, this golden toilet was created by the Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan himself, and it is priceless, I don't know how many people want it.

Churchill's toilet bowl is highly commemorative, and its monetary value is also eye-catching, so it was stolen.

Isn't this nonsense, even if it's a toilet, but it's also **made.,No one is so extravagant to use ** to make a toilet.,It's strange if it's not stolen.。

Investigators noted that the gold toilet installed in the pavilion was stolen, causing serious damage to the building itself, as well as a water leak. Blenheim Palace issued an official statement on the 14th, saying that the pavilion had been closed after the incident.