Is the law we often talk about in our life an objective law in the philosophical sense?

If there is no other wisdom in the world except human beings, then the objectivity of the so-called laws does not exist, and the so-called objective laws of human beings have no meaning for other things.

The scope of the "laws" that we often say in our lives is narrow, and some of them are also wrong, and the "objective laws" in the philosophical sense have some heights.

No. Philosophical. Objective laws. It's the spiritual world. It is eternal. And in life. Law. It is obvious that things change by law.

No, philosophical laws are intrinsic, stable, and necessary connections between things and external essences.

Laws are everywhere in the world, and nothing can exist without them.

1. The law is objective.

Since the law is the inevitable connection of the essence inherent in the objective thing itself, it is not imposed by external forces, that is to say, the law is not subject to human will. Dialectical materialism affirms the objective reality of matter, which also affirms the objectivity of the laws of motion of matter.

Both natural and social laws are objective laws, and as long as conditions exist, they exist and are in effect, and they are not subject to the will of any person or class. People cannot arbitrarily create a law that objectively does not exist according to their own will, or transform or destroy a law that is still in effect.

2. The law can be recognized.

Although the law is objective, it can be recognized and used, and human consciousness has an active effect on matter.

The human brain can reflect not only the phenomena of objective things, but also the essence and laws of things. It is the task of scientific research to understand laws through phenomena.

Objective laws can not only be recognized, but also utilized. People can use the knowledge of regularity to transform the world for the benefit of mankind.

3. Act according to objective laws.

To be a thorough materialist and achieve the goal of transforming the world, we must respect the objective law, proceed from the objective law, and act in accordance with the objective law. To act according to objective laws is to seek truth from facts, which is the fundamental point of materialism.

In order to respect the objective law and act according to the law, we must do the following:

It is necessary to recognize the objectivity of the law. Denying the objectivity of the laws, or only recognizing the objectivity of the laws of nature and not the objectivity of the laws of society, are all idealistic viewpoints, and they cannot act according to the objective laws.

It is necessary to grasp the law in the movement of things. Dialectical materialism tells us that the world is a material world in motion, and that different material forms, different forms of movement, have different laws in different development processes. Therefore, we can only grasp the law in the movement of matter.

Regardless of whether we understand the law or use the law, everything should be shifted by time, place, and conditions, and we should not copy the same rules everywhere, so as to turn the scientific theories that originally conform to the law into a dogma that will remain unchanged through the ages.

It is necessary to correctly handle the relationship between objective law and subjective initiative, and organically combine respect for objective law with bringing into play people's subjective initiative.

The philosophical meaning of law refers to the essential connection in the development of objective things, which has a universal form. Law and essence are concepts of equal degree, and both refer to aspects inherent in the inherently dispersed nature of things, which are hidden behind phenomena and determine or govern them.

However, essence refers to the internal connection of things, which is composed of the internal contradictions of things, while law refers to the essential relationship or stable connection between essences of the same kind of phenomena in terms of the process of development of things, which is the relatively static content of the ever-changing world of phenomena. Laws work repeatedly, and as long as the necessary conditions are met, the phenomenon of complying with the rules and regulations will inevitably recur.

Laws are the inherent necessity of things.

Contact, source. It determines the inevitable trend of the development of things. Laws are objective and do not depend on human will.

l) Laws, that is, objective laws, also known as "laws", refer to the essential connections and inevitable trends in the process of development and change of things. Laws belong to the universal essence and connection between things and phenomena, and determine the direction and trend of the development of things.

2) Scientific laws, also known as laws, refer to the correct understanding of objective laws expressed by people through the thinking forms of concepts, judgments, and reasoning, that is, the scientific generalization and expression of objective laws. For example, Newton's law of gravitation in mechanics is a scientific law, which is a correct understanding of the law of gravitation in the macroscopic physical world. Objective laws and scientific laws are the relationship between the first and the secondary.

A law is an inherently existing tendency for the development of things that are not subject to human will.

The so-called law is the intrinsic, inevitable, and stable connection inherent in the process of the movement of things. The law is objective, it is not subject to human will, it can neither be created nor destroyed, and the law is universal. I just found it from a philosophy book and forgot to adopt it.

The philosophical meaning of the law: "—refers to the meaning of the principle of natural principles, theorems, laws, laws, or natural principles, theorems, laws, laws, laws, laws, laws, Collectively referred to as the categories of the truth of things in the universe. - Geng Ge: Author.

D Explain, according to "the law is the essential and necessary connection", since there are at least two aspects of the connection, and ABC is only one aspect, only D takes into account the other and this.

Or according to the "perceptual cognition to get the cognition of phenomena", all sensations, perceptions, appearances, are phenomena.

The above is from my teacher's answer.

AB should be a law, objective, not subject to human will, CD is a natural phenomenon, not an objective law, because it is easy to be artificially changed, that is, artificially make the water flow to a high place, and the melon cannot be planted. The difference is that laws are not subject to human will, and phenomena are non-objective and can be changed by human will.

a, d, regularity. b, c, phenomenon. Regularity: It is the concept that can be extended, and phenomenon: the concept cannot be extended. For example, the temperature is different in spring, summer, autumn and winter. Sow beans and get beans. b, c, no.

The answer is b.

The relationship between law and phenomenon is essentially the relationship between the essence of things and their appearances. In terms of cognitive methods, the essence and laws cannot be directly recognized, but must be reflected and grasped through rationality, and belong to the scope of human rational understanding. Phenomena and appearances can be directly recognized, and the subject only needs to be able to recognize them through perceptual experience, such as seeing, listening, and asking, which belongs to the scope of human perceptual cognition.

Perceptual cognition is the basis of rational cognition; However, only by reflecting, processing and abstracting perceptual materials can we rise to the level of rational understanding. Of the above four options, ACD is a phenomenon that can be directly observed in life, but B is not understood by people who have not studied professionally.