Which is an unjust war in history 5

First world war. Iran-Iraq war. The United States fought Iraq. The USSR fought Afghanistan. Japan invaded China. The Eight-Nation Coalition invaded China. Opium war.

The First and Second Opium Wars, the Eight-Nation Alliance's War of Aggression against China.

World War II, Japan's war of aggression against China.

There are too many, and they can't be counted, and once they will be successful, the bones will wither, and the people will suffer, and the people will suffer, and the people will die.

The Mongols invaded the Central Plains, Japan invaded China, and the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan.

The Opium War, the Eight-Nation Alliance's War of Aggression against China, and the War of Resistance Against Japan.

The vast majority of wars in history have been unjust.

The most famous is the Spring and Autumn Period, Mencius said that the Spring and Autumn Period were unrighteous wars.

The United States attacked Iraq and Iraq invaded Kuwait.

What does it mean? The most typical one: the war of aggression against China.

Justice is a very subjective word.

But Japan's war with China was one.

There is no justice in war, only interests.

This question should be addressed separately.

The first aspect: such as the Xiongnu, East Turkistan, Great Eclipse, Mongolia, etc., these can be regarded as racial wars or foreign wars. The role of hunger alleviation is the protection of the national race.

The second aspect: the war of the Han nation, which refers to the war, is the war of annexation, or it can also be understood as the war of unification. Ancient Chinese kings had an unusual dedication to the pursuit of unification, and as a successful emperor, his highest goal was to unify and expand on the previous territory.

The effect is to slowly promote a large country dominated by the Han nationality.

In fact, I think that we can't simply define ancient wars as justice and injustice, because in many cases, it may be unjust at the time, but it will be righteous after it is rotten and pure. Personal opinion, I hope it helps you.

World War II is called a just war mainly because it was a war of aggression against Hitler's Nazi clique. At that time, Hitler's Nazi clique in Germany pursued a policy of racial discrimination, colonialism and militarism, which caused great disasters to Europe and other countries in the world. World War II was a war of aggression fought by Britain, France, the Soviet Union, the United States and other countries to resist the German Nazi bloc.

Therefore, World War II is considered a just war against the aggression of Hitler's Nazi clique and the maintenance of world peace.

In addition, World War II had another meaning, that is, it was a war against fascism. Fascism is a totalitarian political ideology that advocates the imposition of a unified consciousness and behavior on people, denying human rights and democracy. Hitler's Nazi clique in Germany is the representative of fascism, and World War II was a war in which all countries of the world united against fascism.

Therefore, World War II is also considered a just war against fascism and for the protection of human rights and democracy in the regiment.

This is relative, the victor is just, and the loser is unjust. And the winner will also try his best to discredit the loser in order to show his greatness!

The wars in modern China or the wars that may occur in China in the future are just, and the wars waged by Japan, the United States, and others are all unjust.

War does not matter whether it is just or unjust, there is only the interests of each party, and the starting point of interests is different, and the perspective, way and definition of the same war are also different.

There is no such thing as justice and injustice in war, and it is always written by the victors. It's like Zhu Di, the king of Yan in the Ming Dynasty, who took the throne of his nephew, is this justice? But after he became the emperor, he did improve the people's livelihood and was a good emperor, so what is this?

Just Wars: Great Patriotic War, North American War of Independence, Latin American War of Independence, War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, and World War II.

Unjust wars: the Russo-Japanese War, World War I, the Seven Years' War, the Thirty Years' War, the Crusades, the 1916 U.S. invasion of Mexico to suppress the revolution, the Bay of Pigs invasion, and now the so-called War on Terror lack justice.

What has advanced in history is a just war.

Winning is just, losing is unjust.

There are two criteria for judging historical events, one is progress, and the other is justice, progress is to represent the direction of historical trends, productive forces, and cultural development, and justice is to represent the will and will of the majority.

Therefore, the Qin Dynasty's unification of the six countries and the conquest of the Americas by the great powers were all progressive, but by no means just, and China's anti-colonial and anti-feudal wars since 1840 were just, but many of the wars of Mongolia and China that lacked progressiveness lacked justice, and the Allied wars in World War II were both just and progressive.

In a war, the two sides involved in the war are inherently relative, and there is no such thing as absolute justice, and it cannot be completely one-size-fits-all.