How do you think the idea of winning and losing is abused?

This is normal, and it is only the problem of heroes who do not judge the success or failure of right or wrong. Isn't it strange that you use artistic achievements to affirm an emperor?! What's more, why are you sure of Li Yu?!

Isn't it because his words are well written, are you originally evaluating him by his success or failure in art, saying that Xiang Yu is a hero, because he has won a hundred battles before; said that Lu Bu was a hero, because he had dominated the world before and was invincible. It's all like this, without the previous victories and successes, who would be sure of them?!

For thousands of years, countless wise men and saints have tried to explore the way of heaven, the laws of nature, and history, and have worked hard to explore the truth, but they have not dared to assert it directly. On the contrary, some people's sentences of "success and defeat" and "history is written by the victors" broke down for Daoming and took it as the truth. They're pretty concise!

He has done what countless masters have not done. These people say that they are stupid, but they are just a group of idlers who have no intention of delving into the history of truth, but only use them to embellish themselves. Three seasons of small people, why refute.

There is only one situation for a hero not to judge success or failure, whether he is conscientious in his post, whether he has made contributions and efforts beyond his time, and in the end, it is really beyond the power of man. Such as Prime Minister Wen, he is a literati, the world collapsed, the times pushed him to that position, he really didn't do a good job, and his ability was not enough, but his last perseverance guarded the righteousness of our flower planters. From a historical point of view, this kind of perseverance in failure is also valuable to future generations, so we will forgive Prime Minister Wen because of his righteousness, what about Li Yu?!

The old refers to the fact that in the struggle for political power, the one who succeeds is legitimate, and he is called the emperor and the king; Those who fail are illegal, and they are called thieves. It contains the power of the successful person, no one dares to blame, but the loser has the meaning of hard to argue. Now it's a metaphorical consequential hero, no matter what, success is good, I feel like people nowadays are a bit utilitarian and don't like it.

This is true all over the world, not just China. There is no shortage of failed heroes in China. In the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, there were Confucius, Mencius, Zhuangzi, Han Feizi, etc., Chen Sheng, Wu Guang, Xiang Yu, etc. at the end of the Qin Dynasty, Liu Bei, Guan Yu, Lu Bu, etc.

Now the success and defeat of the king is based on the result of the hero, and does not look at the process.

I talked to a friend yesterday. I've been sorting out my thoughts, but it's not very clear. In my opinion, it is of course wrong to win or lose, and he denies many equally valuable spirits and ideas.

Too extreme and too monotonous. In the face of my friend who used "Win or Lose" to explain everything that happened, I could only say - just look at life with a normal heart and have a real passion for the people and things around you - but it didn't seem to help him much.

I think it's the meaning of paying attention to results, and now society is a result-based hero, and the concept is at least not excellent for me! Pay more attention to the results, and lack of grasp of the process, you may only get 70 out of 100 points, or lower. Out of this school, your thinking will be compared!

The use of more shows that the market is large, the market is large, the recognition is high, and the recognition is high, which shows the adequacy of its reasoning.

In the world, success or failure is often judged by results. Many people only pay attention to the final result, but for that process, they choose to turn a blind eye and close one eye, even if you have thousands of good, you still can't change the success or defeat. This has to be admitted.

Even if you just don't want to go, others think you can't.

Since ancient times, the victor hero has taken Liu Bang, the ancestor of the Han Dynasty, as an example; Before he became emperor, he was a typical villain, a scoundrel. Xiang Yu is his righteous brother, and he killed Xiang Yu after destroying Qin with Xiang Yu, but after becoming the ancestor of the Han Dynasty, he did not wear a halo to live. killed again, and then take Tang Taizong Li Shiming as an example; The change of Xuanwu Gate, killing his brother and seizing the throne, but he is not advertised as a generation of Ming Jun.

Life is a human being, and death is also a ghost. So far, I think of Xiang Yu.

du, refused to cross the river zhidong. Xiang Yu was defeated, but to this day, people also miss his heroic spirit of not wanting to be reluctant to live and secretly surviving and returning to Jiangdong. There is also Zhao Kuo, Zhao Kuo led an army of 400,000 troops to confront the killing god Bai Qi for the first time, and after 46 days of being surrounded and cut off food, the army was not disturbed, and he could lead the army to break through.

This kind of commanding ability alone is not something that ordinary people can have, you say that he has poor ability, even Li Mu, one of the four generals of the Warring States Period, was promoted by him, although he was defeated in the end, but it cannot be said that he is incapable.

Barbarism is to eliminate the weak, otherwise what social justice is still the concern, reasonable distribution, the boss squeezes you is justice, who makes the elite Rong is the elite, and the loser is the loser. Many people often comment that others always like to use this sentence, and when it comes to themselves, they pretend to be weak, and they are sympathetic, and this is how the double standard is played.

Since ancient times, China has also paid attention to becoming a king and defeating a king, and this idiom actually has a subtext.

This statement is clearly wrong. Victory or Failure Source.

It has nothing to do with justice or not. Victory only shows that it had an advantage during that period, whether it was in money, power, or troops. But what does this have to do with justice. Justice is a subjective evaluation, and everyone's inner justice is different.

According to victory or not, to change one's own view of justice, in layman's terms, this is called wall grass, falling with the wind. Of course, the victor can suppress so that the loser is not allowed to claim that he is righteous, even if he is, or is not.

See how you analyze the cause and effect of this sentence. Because of "into."