On the question of the World Cup blowing penalty

The standards for law enforcement are different. For example, the law enforcement standards of the Premier League and Serie A are different, and the Premier League advocates physical confrontation, so unless it is a very serious physical confrontation, it will not be blown. But in Serie A, the ball itself that can't be blown in the Premier League may be blown up.

The referees of the World Cup are selected by the referees of each league, so the standards of each referee are different, in order to play fairly, we can only unify everyone's standards and try to make the game fairer, so it will be generally strict. And why are the standards so strict, because football cultures around the world are different, and only a relatively neutral standard can be taken. As for how it was formulated, it is not for us to understand.

ps: If the Premier League is looser, Argentina is very strict, because the Argentine league has more small moves, so it will be stricter. So the World Cup isn't particularly strict.

The severity of the blowing penalty is mainly because of the purpose of protecting the player, and the impact of injury on an athlete is a lifetime, so in order to protect the player, the scale of the blowing penalty is increased. 10 World Cup cards are also due to the fact that the players' actions are generally larger, and the referees frequently play cards in order to control the players' emotions.

As for the level of play, I think you can think about it differently, with red and yellow cards you can add to the drama and spectacle of the game.

The World Cup is played for honor, and the league's clubs play for money, so the World Cup is more stringent, mainly for the sake of fair competition, because the Hercules Cup is very heavy after all, which prompts the referee to blow harshly, and the players who often play the league with looser penalties will of course commit more fouls.

The referee also has the saying that the card is crazy. Due to the long schedule of the league, there is a lot of time for players to recover, and there are many referees needed, so it is impossible to be well trained; However, the referees of the World Cup are strictly trained, and if a player is injured, he may not be able to recover after the cup game.

The scale of the league's blowing penalty is measured by the degree of confrontation and intensity of the country, the World Cup is unified with international standards, people all over the world are watching, it can be said that every penalty represents the image of FIFA and various organizations, it will be very cautious and strict, to take into account the overall situation and not like the league, it is definitely different! So why will the misjudgment of the World Cup be infinitely magnified, but the misjudgment in the league will not be so many people who will not be unforgiving.

The 2002 World Cup was a World Cup shrouded in darkness. Especially in the game of South Korea's Italy, the referee's actions simply tarnished the referee's profession. Years after that game, the referee who officiated the game finally admitted that he had accepted a huge bribe from the Korean Football Association to ensure that the South Korean team would eliminate Italy.

And the end of this Colombian referee is also miserable. In the end, he was shot by a gang at home and ended his life.

Different stadiums, the standards of law enforcement are different, and FIFA's strict blowing penalty may be for the slogan of fair play, "My Game is Fair Play".

The above policies are different, and FIFA's image is maintained by the whistle. It is estimated that the referee will play more cards and dividends.

Haha, maybe it's because in 2002 it was too loose for South Korea and Japan.

Jiang Wanying, who is 1.73 meters tall, seems to be very experienced in the height that her arms should maintain, which just allows Li Ya to tap the ground on her toes, which can be used hard but not at all.

Walden looked at Johnny's appearance, as if he really wanted to let himself go, so he asked: Then what conditions do you have? I absolutely disagree with a will. ”