-
Comprehensive tx7 is good, the indicator is also tx7 strong, tx7's ** is in my space, you can take a look.
The TX7 is the most powerful of the three cameras, and it is also the highest, but it is worth the money and can bring you a whole new experience.
-
?Why does the upstairs say that?
It depends on what you're after, if you're looking for image quality, F200EXR, it's really a very good picture quality, and it's not much different from a low-end SLR, however, the premise is that it's only in good light conditions.
In dim conditions, night scenes, etc., the best picture quality is TX7, and the best is TX7 for entertainment and operability
Appearance, hehe, tx7, there's nothing to say, the disadvantage is that the battery is too small, it is recommended to add 30 yuan, buy a domestic battery for backup.
Canon's lens has a large zoom ratio, and all the performance is lively, which is really not recommended, and it is not as good as the F85EXR
-
It is recommended not to choose Sony TX7
In pursuit of color, influence quality, choose Fujifilm F200EXR
The pursuit of physique and fashion choose ixus210
-
With 16-50 or 18-55, one set of cameras is enough. A better Fujifilm R LM wr Fujifilm lens has a constant aperture, and the volume is slightly larger, but it is a large aperture.
-
Normally, Fujifilm is the best value for money, but there are many reasons why I would choose Sony. Let's break it down for you.
1. Canon's focus is on his SLR field, card players are not Canon's strong point, and they are not in a hurry for Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, etc., whether it is cost-effective or functional. For example, the IXUS210 series you said uses CCD, and the shooting in low light is very poor. And the machine is huge.
2. Fujifilm's F series supports full manual transmission, that is"m"file,This one is more professional.,And Sony TX and W series don't support M files.,Sony will only support the HX series.,So there's no comparison.。
3. Sony is the world's largest supplier of CCD CMOS for cameras, supplying image sensors to many manufacturers. The image quality is mainly limited by three aspects: the image sensor, the lens, and the processor. The Sony models you wrote above are all focused on appearance and portability, only the TX series uses the back-illuminated Exmor R CMOS, which has the advantage of taking pictures at night, good image quality, and low noise.
But **expensive. To sum up, if you are looking for image quality, I recommend you to buy Sony's TX series, or the WX series (such as the WX7), because they use a back-illuminated CMOS and are small in size. Powerful.
I sell cameras, and I sell all brands, which is my summary of my years of experience. Sony's card machine is really powerful.
-
In terms of imaging, it is definitely Fujifilm's F200 that is better.
Inch. This is really rare in a small camera. Because the larger the CCD area, the more photosensitive area. Therefore, it is better than the imaging of the ixus210.
The caliber of the lens itself is also larger than that of the ixus210. This way, more light goes in. The effect is also naturally better than that of the ixus210.
Comes with a manual function. Although it is generally not used at home. However, if you use the manual function indoors or at night, you can get much better results than an automatic camera.
The light can be adjusted by itself. It is not bright in the front and black in the back. Then there is the fact that the distance of the flash is limited.
The manual function is also perfect for eliminating red eyes.
Sum up. If practicality is taken into account, the F200 is stronger than the Ixus210.
-
It's still 70D, Canon's lens group is powerful,.
-
What do you shoot mainly, 70D portraits are very good.
-
Personally, I choose the F605, first of all, the sensory element 1 2, which is obviously the largest, and it uses EXR COMS, which is no worse than that of Sony and Canon; secondly, 15 is changed by light, regardless of whether it can be used well or not, at least it is configured here; Third, the appearance is a bit retro, and it won't be the same, haha.
-
DC Fuji has the highest cost performance without suspense, and the only drawback is the appearance!
-
In fact, the public will prefer Canon when buying a camera, but I still love Sony, so I hope you can also consider Sony.
-
Canon is good, and the ability to fill light is strong.
The color is good, because of the built-in settings that imitate Fujifilm's famous films such as RVP and RDP.
Fujifilm F200EXR, of course! It is also more cost-effective. >>>More
Fujifilm F200 with manual function, 110 fully automatic. The image quality should be comparable, but Fujifilm's high light sensitivity is better in dark environments such as indoors. The shape of the canon is beautiful. >>>More
I've been studying iAudio E2 for more than a month, and I feel that everyone's evaluation is generally okay As a result, I went to the computer city today to listen to and study for an hour, and came to a conclusion: the sound quality is really not good, not as good as Avery and T8, those BBK sound effects are not very effective, choose Sony's B152F sound quality will be better, I auditioned it all in the physical store, with the same song, the same headphones and earbuds, and found 3 friends to listen to it together, and unanimously felt that the sound quality of iAudio E2 is not good, Other iaudio fans see it, don't spray it.,Don't believe it, listen to Avery and T8 yourself.,It's much more comfortable than E2! Recommend Sony The landlord is cautious E2The appearance is still really good, and the brown is super good-looking
Let's choose F85 of Fuji!
First of all, in 75 and 85, choose 85 directly, 75 came out, received wide acclaim, is the best in portable telephoto, 85 is similar to it, but it makes up for many of its shortcomings, it is an improved version, **Hundreds of bad, don't care about the money, buy 85 better. >>>More