iPhone lawsuit, what s going on?

In the middle of this month, the third-party organization Primate Labs analyzed and disclosed that when testing the performance of the old iPhone models, it was found that "Apple is artificially reducing the performance of the old iPhone," after replacing the battery, the iPhone runs significantly faster. Then it was revealed that with the aging of the battery, Apple may limit the performance of the old mobile phone, and this conclusion made the forum explode, and soon there were nearly 10,000 comments and more than 100,000 likes.

To this end, Poole, the founder of Geekbench, a foreign running score app, personally verified that he showed Geekbench data from 100,000 Apple phone samples, which showed the correlation between processor performance degradation and battery deterioration. For this incident, Apple's explanation is that after the release of 6S, it was found that the power consumption of high-performance processors increased and caused abnormal shutdown when the battery was aging, so Apple added a patch to the version that automatically reduced the CPU performance of mobile phones with aging batteries, so as to repair these mobile phones.

iPhone gets into a lawsuit

However, Apple's mistake was that it did not make an announcement to explain this at the time, until some careful netizens recently found that the Apple mobile phone that had been used for two years was abnormally stuck, and after comparing it with the new iPhone, it was found that the performance of the old iPhone had dropped by as much as 50%, which detonated the network. iPhone Gets Involved in Lawsuit, Apple Weakens Old Mobile Phone Performance and Is Demanded Sky-High Compensation The uproar about Apple's weakening of the performance of the old iPhone has not subsided, and some angry fruit fans and lawyers have participated. According to Softpedia, the amount of one of the lawsuits is as high as $999 billion, which is directly the rhythm of Apple's collapse, because its total market value as of press time is only $875.7 billion.

The plaintiffs allege that Apple is at fault on three points:

1. Weaken performance to prolong battery life and prevent accidental shutdown without informing the user in advance;

2. Those users who choose to change ** because of slow performance are actually blinded;

3. The iOS update does not include a description of the weakened performance, nor does it remind the user to choose not to update to avoid the weakened performance.

Recently, according to foreign media, due to the Apple frequency reduction gate incident, the federal courts in the United States have accepted eight class action lawsuits from users, and the claims in these lawsuits may reach 999 billion US dollars. In the middle of this month, Primate Labs, a third-party organization, disclosed that when testing the performance of old iPhone models, it was found that "Apple is artificially reducing the performance of old iPhones," and after replacing the battery, the iPhone runs significantly faster. Subsequently, Apple admitted to downclocking the older iPhone processor due to battery life reasons.

As soon as this news came out, most users were dissatisfied, believing that Apple did not inform them to downclock their iPhones in order to maintain the battery life of their iPhones, so that users unknowingly upgraded to the latest system version. At present, due to Apple's iPhone frequency reduction incident, the federal courts in the United States have accepted eight class action lawsuits from users. According to foreign media softpedia**, the amount of these lawsuits may reach 999 billion US dollars.

If Apple's current market value of $900 billion is estimated, $999 billion has even exceeded Apple's market value.

Although Apple's market capitalization exceeded $900 billion last month, the $999 billion amount sued is still beyond what Apple can pay. Of course, this is only a rough estimate, not to mention that these lawsuits have not yet been filed, and even if they are, the final amount of damages may be very different from this figure. Apple has not responded to this matter by press time.

Apple has not been doing well lately, and it is said that the sales of the iPhone X are not as good as expected.

In September this year, the official version of iOS 11 was pushed to all users, and iPhone 5s and later models can be upgraded. As many users of old phones, especially the iPhone 6 6S and iPhone 7, feel that the phones are starting to slow down and lag due to this upgrade, third-party evaluation agencies also believe that Apple seems to be deliberately limiting the performance of the older models through horizontal evaluations. Soon, Apple acknowledged this fact, but stressed that the move was to prevent the iPhone from accidentally shutting down or malfunctioning unexpectedly due to the aging of the lithium battery.

Despite Apple's rhetoric, some users are not buying it. They believe that Apple's practice is a "black box operation", and it is not disclosed to users, nor does it make any accusations and prompts, so Apple's defense did not calm users' doubts, but provoked many consumers to file lawsuits in many places in the United States.

At present, eight class action lawsuits have been accepted by various federal courts in the United States against Apple over the frequency reduction issue. According to foreign media**, the amount of these lawsuits may reach $999 billion, and if Apple's current market value of $900 billion is estimated, $999 billion has even exceeded Apple's market value. However, this is only a rough estimate, and even then** the final amount of compensation may vary greatly from this figure.

Although we can't estimate the additional impact of this incident on Apple for the time being, one thing is certain that it is impossible for Apple to calm the public skepticism with just an official statement, and this matter will continue to ferment, and we will follow up on the latest news in the future.

The smoothness of older iPhones and iPhones with low battery life was deliberately reduced by Apple.

As a result, the hand banquet is clever and the machine changes the card.

was evaluated by foreign countries and complained collectively.

What's going on with the iPhone lawsuit? Why is the iPhone in a lawsuit?

iPhone Gets Involved in Lawsuit, Apple Weakens Old Mobile Phone Performance and Is Demanded Sky-High Compensation The uproar about Apple's weakening of the performance of the old iPhone has not subsided, and some angry fruit fans and lawyers have participated.

According to Softpedia, the amount of one of the lawsuits is as high as $999 billion, which is directly the rhythm of the collapse of Apple's letter core, because its total market value as of press time is only $875.7 billion.

The plaintiffs allege that Apple is at fault on three points:

1. Weaken performance to prolong battery life and prevent accidental shutdown without informing the user in advance;

2. Those users who choose to change ** because of slow performance are actually blinded;

3. The iOS update does not add a description of the weakened performance, nor does it remind users to choose not to update to avoid the weakening of the performance.

In addition, some users also said that they basically have high hopes for Apple and will switch to the Android platform in the future.

Recently, the iPhone has not been very peaceful, and the mobile phone sales are large, and it has been involved in a lawsuit. In the past year, most users may blame the aging of the processor for app crashes and poor phone performance and choose to buy a new phone, when the real reason is that the battery is low and you can trade in the old for very little money.

In this regard, the non-governmental organization "Anti-Apple Alliance" said that if technical means are used to limit the performance of old devices that can still maintain high performance, and force consumers to abandon their old devices and buy new ones, then this behavior is undoubtedly theft. And this kind of behavior happens to high-tech companies that have always advocated innovation, and it is more serious than theft.

Driving sales of new phones by reducing the performance of older phones? Although Apple previously responded that it was to better extend the life of the battery, it is difficult to convince consumers of such reasons, on the contrary, such a move will make consumers feel that Apple's "eating appearance" is becoming more and more ugly.

Many Apple mobile phone users have had such an experience, as soon as the Apple mobile phone is upgraded to a new system, it will become slow and stuck, and many people have questioned that Apple deliberately limits the performance of the old iPhone, forcing users to buy **Apple mobile phones. Apple responded to this on the 21st, saying that it did limit the performance of the old model. But they stressed that the move was to prevent the old iPhone models from accidentally shutting down or malfunctioning unexpectedly due to the aging of the lithium battery.

I'm afraid that the iphone is going downhill because of the more and more ugly appearance, since the departure of Jobs, the iphone has never come up with amazing creative works, and now the iPhone's ** is also rarely declining, I'm afraid that the first position of the mobile phone boss will be shaken.

And the definition they give of slowdown is a feature rather than a defect, and our goal is to provide the best experience for our customers, Apple said. However, it sounds like the restaurant has cut the amount of dishes, and it says that it is for your health and is helping you.

In fact, Apple has never been known for its openness and transparency. The company has always been secretive, even when it comes to its own employees. So I think it's only a matter of time before it gets into a lawsuit.

The recent news about the iPhone lawsuit has attracted the attention of many netizens, and since the death of Steve Jobs, Apple has not had any innovative design, so, what kind of company is Apple?

For 10 years, the iPhone has been a revolutionary mobile phone, and every new product release is setting an industry benchmark and leading the "way forward" for friends. And now, the appearance of the iPhone X is still amazing, but it is no longer the "big brother", and even has to get inspiration from Android phones. Apple has also stepped down from the altar, from a "great" company to a "not bad" company.

iPhone's market share is increasing year by year. According to IDC data, in the first quarter of this year, Apple's global market share fell from the same period last year, and continued to decline in the second quarter. In the Chinese market, Apple's revenue in Greater China fell 25% quarter-on-quarter in the latest quarter, and more than 50% compared to the second quarter of 2015.

Apple's concept stocks are currently in a relatively sluggish position on the A** fieldOn the one hand, it is because many Apple concept stocks have risen greatly before, and the valuation is not cheap; On the other hand, at present, the tuyere of the A** field, in cyclical stocks such as steel, coal, nonferrous metals, and chemicals, does not rule out the withdrawal of some large funds from Apple concept stocks and switch to cyclical resource stocks and chemical **.

This year's new iPhone X, as a tribute to the 10th anniversary of the iPhone, is not only not creative enough, but also insincere. In the whole press conference, we didn't see the "future", only "other people's figures".