What do you think about the restaurant not having a WIFI password being fined?

Although the incident said that the restaurant was fined for not setting a wifi password is justified, many people know little about this regulation, so if the incident is indeed handled correctly, it is still necessary to popularize the regulation to the public.

A reporter from Guangdong TV contacted the Zimaling Police Station of the Zhongshan Public Security Bureau, where the ticket was issued, and Chen Wei, deputy director, said, "We have issued an on-site warning to merchants who provide WiFi to the public, including public WiFi with direct passwords and without passwords." ”

Subscribe. As a store manager, Mr. Liu has been engaged in the catering industry.

Four or five years later, a few days ago, the public security organs, together with the communications company, came to Mr. Liu's store and issued a fine and demanded that he pay 800 yuan on the grounds of providing public Wi-Fi and failing to pay the network supervision fee.

made him a little overwhelmed, although he knew that he was a police officer and needed to cooperate with his work, he was still confused.

Mr. Liu said: "At that time, the staff told me that if I didn't pay the fee, I couldn't provide wifi to the customer, otherwise we would not cooperate with the work. Then the reporter contacted Mr. Ren, who also opened a teahouse on this street, and Mr. Ren said

At least I should know what the fees are and what they are for. ”

Both bosses said they had paid two years ago, but they hadn't figured anything out, and then they brought back a piece of equipment that didn't use it at all.

Later, it was learned that the fee charged by the two bosses was used to purchase this secure wifi equipment and provide services to diners through the wifi network, and the owners admitted that the public security organs would cooperate unconditionally when handling the matter, but this time they paid for the installation of the secure wifi, and they did not know anything about the relevant laws and regulations and the purpose of the equipment.

What is the role of this kind of security wifi, and what is the charging standard, the reporter came to the local police station, and the staff said: "We are like some stores that obviously provide free wifi, including direct password and public wifi without password for on-site warning." According to the police, these warning tickets and installations are based on laws and regulations.

The relevant laws and regulations stipulate that security protection measures must be implemented in public places that provide network services, and the installation and operation of a security management system security wifi is this system, which is done to prevent public networks from being used by criminals.

And for the security of ordinary civilian WiFi, network security experts say that network security in public places is often ignored, and the lowest harm is that the traffic may be stolen, and the serious heavy Trojan horse puts hacker programs.

Once you get through this wifi, it will be intercepted, and a lot of wifi is connected to the camera, without this setting, it can easily be hacked.

In addition, the use of these equipment, the police said that they are responsible for the maintenance and management of the first business in each region, and you can contact the store owner or police station when using it, and the charge is mainly the cost of the security equipment manager, not collected by the public security organ, but charged by a third-party technology company.

The regulation of WiFi security in public places has been an unresolved issue for several years. Whether it's a merchant who provides free Wi-Fi or a customer who connects to an external network without a sense of vigilance, they don't realize how serious the consequences of connecting to a wifi without a security device in public places are.

Recently, some restaurants in Zhongshan, Guangdong Province were fined by law enforcement officers. Law enforcement and telecommunications companies worked together to find the owner and ask him to pay an $800 fine, nominally"Network Regulatory Fees" 。According to the relevant personnel, it is not possible to provide Wi-Fi to customers without paying this fee.

The shopkeepers are confused: this wifi has been provided for several years, why do they only say that they have to pay now? What is the name of this fee? What are the standards?

Later, after further investigation, it was learned that this fee was used to install relevant safety devices. The WiFi network used by consumers in public places must pass through this device.

Other nearby restaurateurs said they had paid the money two years ago"Network Regulatory Fees", and then retrieved a device from the law enforcement officer, but because of the lack of knowledge, the device was never used.

In fact, there are laws to follow these regulations, but because the law is not in place, many public business occasions are unaware of this. Merchants that offer free Wi-Fi, especially those that have a password directly attached to the storefront in a conspicuous place, or even connect directly without a password, will need to issue a ticket and reinstall the security management system.

The security of civilian wifi has been neglected. As small as stealing traffic, as large as being placed on a Trojan, completely"Naked"Public WiFi with no password and no security interception can be easily hacked. Some people will even use fake AP hotspots, you are connected to my WiFi, and you take the traffic from me, but the data back will also be intercepted by me.

This is tantamount to putting one's personal information and data transmission in the hands of others without disguise.

But how can ordinary merchants know that they must use safety equipment? Now, although there will be ** businesses in various regions to maintain and manage WiFi security equipment, they must take the initiative to contact the police station in the area to deal with it.

Then again, consumers are the first to defend their own information security. When you're away from home, you can choose to use your own data instead of free wifi. If you really want to use it, use a wifi with a password that matches your location.

Don't connect to some unfamiliar wifi, and try to use fingerprint password where you have to enter the password.

Many restaurant practitioners have to consider a question when installing a restaurant for the first time, whether to install more broadband in the restaurant? In this way, customers will have a fast Internet access speed and a good Internet experience, so the restaurant will be evaluated well, and there will be more repeat customers, and business will naturally be good.

Is there a problem with this line of thinking?

There seems to be no problem.

Starbucks, Luckin, ** bubble tea shop ,...Which one doesn't have wifi?

However, it should be noted that whether it is Starbucks, or Luckin, or other restaurants, they all have their own characteristics:

1. Who are their main customers?

2. Is it wifi that attracts customers to the store?

It's scary to think about. 1. Their main customer group is young white-collar workers, and the criteria for young white-collar workers to choose restaurants are: fashion, business, freedom, personality, etc.;

2. The first factor they attract customers is, is it related to wifi?

Not necessarily. Nowadays, the three major operators have launched countless unlimited traffic**, which has already made most young people accustomed to their own traffic, and the growing traffic income of operators also proves that more and more people are willing to pay for Internet access, especially after entering the 4G era, how many people keep asking for restaurant wifi password in order to save a few cents? Even the snail-like internet speed in the restaurant has ever given them a good experience?

In fact, now many places will have wifi, because wifi is also very convenient, and we don't have a network and watch TV dramas will use wifi, after all, wifi also does not need its own traffic.

But now, there is a restaurant wifi is not set up secret and has been fined, this ticket was issued by the public security organ and the communication company together in the store, why is this happening?

Restaurant wifi

According to the understanding, after being fined, the shopkeeper was very helpless, and he was full of questions, why would he be fined if he didn't set a password? In fact, the reason for the opening of the fine now is that the network supervision fee has not been paid, and it is required to collect about 800 yuan.

And at that time, the staff said that it was not possible to provide customers with wifi if they did not pay the fee, and if they did not pay, they would not cooperate with the work. Later, after understanding, it was learned that the fee charged was used to purchase a safe wifi device, and the network used by customers was required to go through this wifi, but some store owners said that it was reasonable? According to the police, the basis for the warning, ticket, and installation is that there are laws and regulations to follow.

It's a little too weird, it's natural for the store to be convenient for customers, and the official's hand is a little long; If the home wifi does not have a password, won't you also be fined?

I feel like wifi has become a necessity when you're away from home, and if you don't have wifi in one place, it probably means you can't do anything. Even if you need wifi to pay, so if there is no wifi to be sent, I think we should learn a lesson, and next time we must not do such a small thing.

The wife used in public bai,Don't set the wifi password was fined by the communication company and the public security agency,I also feel very puzzled when I see this DAO,Why free wifi will be fined,This makes me puzzled,So I checked it on the Internet,In fact, this is a law to follow。 The penalty for this fine is due to the failure to pay the network supervision fee, so what is the network supervision fee? The network supervision fee is used to ensure the safety of the wife, and the wifi set up in the store can be used by every customer, so since customers are allowed to use it, it is necessary to ensure the safety of their use, so I think this fine is actually quite reasonable.

Listening to the incident of not being fined for not setting wifi passwords, many people may think it is incredible, but there may be such regulations in the country, because there will be many security risks in open networks, so the state has such regulations.

I don't think it's necessary, no password is to facilitate customers to come to the store to eat and surf the Internet, so it will be out of this consideration, regardless of how fast the network is, this is out of human nature, this should not be fined, China should have some such safe and stable, no password free wifi

Hello landlord, I personally think this thing is not done properly, why not let the use of public wifi, why let the restaurant set wifi password? It is also necessary to install special network equipment, isn't this a forced buy and a strong sale? Are there still human rights and freedoms?

The restaurant does not set the wifi password, which is a very humane thing, and the law enforcement officers have to set up a network supervision fee for wifi, which is in line with the law, which is reasonable, but unexpected. We see that the problem needs to be calm, and both sides actually have reasons, which makes us very entangled, one side is network security, and the other side is the humanized protection of the restaurant.

In fact, it is possible for restaurants to use the Internet, which will attract customers to come to eat. But not having a password is a bit of a waste of resources. So, the regulatory authorities have come up with some fines, and it should be reasonable.

Cybersecurity has become one of the top concerns of the public. The restaurant sets up a wifi password to prevent people from taking advantage of it. This one is good. Just let the customer know when he needs it.

I think this approach is very correct, because there are many restaurants that do not set wifi passwords, so that people outside can connect to the Internet casually, and restaurant customers have no way to use smooth Internet speed, so I think the practice of restaurants not setting wifi passwords is very good.

I really don't understand. Why is there a penalty for not adding a password to a restaurant's wireless network? Is it now?

Do good deeds and learn from Lei Feng, do you really have to be punished? Or is there a virus in his wireless network? I deliberately didn't set up a secret and wanted to attack with a virus.

All consumers are connected to his Wi-Fi. Cell phone.

Restaurants can set a wifi password, and then paste the password on the counter or anywhere in the restaurant to let customers know, so that the network security is guaranteed.

I don't think the restaurant has a wifi password, isn't that a good thing? So everyone can connect, so why bother with this kind of? If the restaurant sets the wifi password, how can the customers connect, the restaurant does not set the wifi password, which is a very convenient thing, so that many customers also agree, and it also makes them feel convenient.

This is correct, the public network without wifi password, because one is likely to bring public security risks, increase the workload of network security staff, and secondly, because it will lead to people who rub the network to be phished wifi to be infringed by rights and interests, adding wifi password is to maintain public safety and protect the network security of users.

Network regulation is a must. Prevent the network from being exploited by criminals.

Recently, the restaurant suddenly came to the law enforcement officer who said that he would charge a network supervision fee, and the installation of special equipment was not allowed to open the public wifi. This is also conducive to protecting the network environment, preventing malicious destruction by some criminals, etc., or preventing some people's privacy from being stolen.