Is this sentence a definite clause or a copositional clause? Why?

Determinative clause. The two sides in the back will sit down together and talk to modify the point in front of it, and play the role of a definite here.

That leads to the following non-restrictive definite clause.

Where is a relative adverb that is used to express a definite clause of place.

That's why I'm going to pick A.

Attached: The difference between the copositional clause and the definite clause.

1) The that in the definite clause not only replaces the antecedent, but also makes a certain component (subject or object) in the clause, while the that in the copositional clause is a conjunction, which only plays the role of connecting the main clause and the clause, and does not act as any component in the clause.

2) The definite clause is an adjective, and its function is to modify the antecedent, qualify the antecedent, and describe the nature or characteristics of the definite; Homonymous clauses are noun and their function is to supplement the noun. For example:

1) the news that he told me is that tom would go abroad next year.(The news he told me was that Tom would be out next year.) (The first that leads the clause is a definite clause, and that is the object in the clause).

2)the news that tom would go abroad is told by him.(He told the news that Tom would be going abroad.) (Homonymous clause, that does not make any component in the sentence).

If A, what does that make up for the sentence?

Therefore, for the definite clause, where leads, and the definite clause is made in the sentence.

The definite clause, choose b, is the location, and the role is the limit.

The role of the synonym is to illustrate, to explain.

I think if you use that, the two sides are too abrupt, and it will make people not understand what it is or the two sides of **, so use where to make it clearer, or if you can, use so that

Answer: We think that you can find difficult as a definite clause, because the relative pronoun that is both a guide and an ingredient in the clause (note: it is the same object in this sentence) also has a real meaning.

In the noun clause, that only plays the role of a guiding word, has no real meaning, and does not play any role.

is a definite clause. Because the object is missing in the clause. The object in the clause should be the discipline in the main clause. The words of the object clause usually refer to the preceding noun with that or what.

Can you find a sentence that you find difficult? Inside this sentence is a definite clause. A sentence is followed by a definite clause that modifies the noun. Because the object is made in the definite clause, the relative pronoun is omitted.

This is an obvious definite clause, that you find difficult to modify sentencesYou find sentences that are difficult.

that you find difficult is a definite clause. The details are as follows:

When a clause defines the modified word as an abstract noun (problem, news, truth, question, hope, freedom, health, etc.) and explains the specific content of the abstract noun, the clause is called an appositional clause. Conversely, if the abstract noun of the clause qualifying modification does not state the content of the clause, the clause is a definite clause.

the news that our headmaster will come backto our school tomorrow is true.Homonymous clause (which describes the specific content of the antecedent news).

the news that he told me today is true.(The specific content of the antecedent news is not specified, and this clause is a definite clause).

This is a definite clause. That in that you find difficult is a relative pronoun that refers to the antecedent sentences in the main clause and acts as the object of find in the clause.

P.S. The grammatical structure of the clause.

Subject] you

Predicate verb] find

Object] that (conjunctive relative pronoun).

Bin Complement] difficult

This is a definite clause, and the antecedent is the object of find.

find it difficult object, object complement.

The biggest difference between a definite clause and an appositional clause is that the introductory words in the definite clause are made as components in the clause, while the introductory words of the copositional clauses are not constituent in the clause.

The sentence above should be a definite clause, because the sentence that follows the sentence is used in the main clause to modify the sentences in front of it, so it should belong to the definite clause.

It is a definite clause, a sentence that you find difficult, which is a modification of the sentence. Homonyms are more like dashes in Chinese, which play the role of supplementary explanations, explaining the specific content of a thing.

For example: I had no idea that you were here

can you come up with sentences that you find difficult？For the definite clause, the antecedent is made the object of find.

This sentence is a definite clause. The antecedent is sentence sthat you find difficult as a clause. The whole sentence means can you come up with a sentence that is difficult to find.

Homonymous clause refers to the clause that acts as a copositional clause in a compound sentence, which belongs to the category of noun clauses, and the copositional clause is used to explain the abstract noun in front of it, and the word being explained and the cotopic are logically the main table relationship, that is, the word being explained is equal to the coposition.

Determinative clauses, also known as relative clauses and adjective clauses, refer to a kind of clauses guided by relative words, because the syntactic function of this kind of clause is mostly to be a definite clause, so it was once called a definite clause, and this kind of clause can be used as other components such as adverbials in addition to being a definite clause, so modern linguistics mostly uses the term "relative clause".

In English, definite clauses are mainly constructed by relational pronouns.

Relationship Composition. The syntactic function of a relational clause is mainly to act as a definite. In English, a relative clause is usually placed after the word or phrase it modifies.

The words and phrases modified by the relative clause are called antecedents, the words that guide the relative clauses are called relative words, and the relative words refer to the antecedents and act as certain components in the relative clauses.

this is the book which interests me.

which interests me" is a relative clause that modifies the first bridge dry line word "book", while the relative word "which" refers to the antecedent word "book" and acts as the subject in the slag relation from the simplification of the quiet sentence. This sentence can be understood in two sentences, "This is the book."and "the book interests me."”。

The copositional clause is used to explain the specific and subtle content of the modified noun, and the definite clause is used to limit the modified noun. Its function is to distinguish the modified noun from other similar things, what, how, if, whatever, etc., which can lead the noun clause, but not the definite clause.

The difference between the copositional clause and the definite clause is LayunfengThe nouns modified by the copositional clause are relatively limited, usually hope, wish, idea, news, fact, promise, opinion, suggestion, truth, etc., while the nouns modified by the definite clause are very extensive.

However, when they guide the copositional clause, it is not necessarily, and for example, why guides the definite clause, it usually only modifies the noun thereason, and when that guides the copositional clause, it does not act as a sentence component, and when it guides the conjunctive clause, it acts as a relative pronoun, either as the subject of the definite clause or as the object of the definite clause.

A copositional clause is a clause that acts as a copositional clause in a compound sentence, and a definite clause is a sentence that is modified and qualified by a noun or pronoun.

The difference between an appositional clause and a definite clause.

1) The definite clause modifies the antecedent, which is the modifier relationship with the antecedent; The copositional clause explains the specific content of the antecedent, and it is the same relationship with the antecedent.

the plane that has just taken off is for paris.Determinative clause.

the fact that he has died is quite clear.(copositional clause).

2) The definite clause is guided by a relative pronoun or a relative adverb, and the relative word plays the corresponding sentence component in the clause, and the relative pronoun can often be omitted when it is used as an object in the clause. The copositional clause is mainly guided by the conjunction that and does not act as a sentence component in the clause; Conjunctions such as where, when, how, who, whether, what, etc., can also lead to copositional clauses, which act as components in the clauses.

the news that he told me is true.Determinative clause.

the news that he has just died is true.(copositional clause).

The difference between a definite clause and an equivocal clause is that the modifiers are different, the number of antecedents is different, and the connecting words are different.

Different modifiers: Homonymous clauses mainly modify nouns that express abstract meanings; The definite clause mainly modifies a person or thing. The number of antecedents is different:

Antecedents in copositional clauses are limited; The antecedent in the definite clause is infinite. Different conjunctions: The conjunctions in homonymous clauses mainly include whether, how, that, etc.; The conjunctions in the adherent clause mainly include but, which, etc.

Specific differences:

1. The difference in the words modified by the clause. The words modified by the copositional clause are usually a few nouns that express abstract meanings, such as belief, doubt, fact, hope, etc. The antecedent of a definite clause can refer to a person, a thing, etc.

2. The role of connectives is different. The that that of the concatenating cotopic clause only plays the role of conjunctive clause and does not serve as any sentence component in the clause. whether and how can lead copositional clauses, but not definite clauses.

The conjunctions that lead the definite clause are relational words, and the common relational pronouns and relational adverbs are that, which, who, whom, whom, when, where, why, etc.

3. The role of clauses is different. The definite clause has the characteristics of an adjective or an adverb, which modifies and limits the antecedent, describes the nature or characteristics of the antecedent, and has a subordinate relationship with the antecedent. The copositional clause has the characteristics of a noun, and it is the specific content of the central word to further supplement and explain the central word.

The differences between definite clauses and homonymatic clauses are as follows:

The difference between an appositional clause and a definite clause is as follows:

1. The difference in meaning.

The copositional clause is used to describe the specific content of the modified noun, and it can usually be equated with the modified word; The definite clause restricts the modified noun, and its function is to distinguish the modified noun from other similar things.

we are glad at the news that he will come.We were happy to hear that he was coming. (The content of news is that he will come, so that leads to the same clause).

we are glad at the news that he told us.We were very happy to hear the news he told us. (That clause restricts the content of the news, i.e., we are happy only because he told the accompanying news and not other news, so that clause is a definite clause).

2. The difference in the guiding words.

what, how, if, whatever, etc., can lead to noun clauses, but not definite clauses.

3. The function of the guide words is different.

When that guides the copositional clause, it does not act as a sentence component, while when it guides the definite clause, it acts as a relative pronoun, either as the subject of the definite clause or as the object of the definite clause. As in the example above, that in He Told Us acts as the object of told.