Is it reasonable for poor college students to cancel poverty subsidies when they use iPhones?

Poverty subsidies are for those who are unable to pay thousands of tuition fees each year. They are prepared for people who can't eat a six-dollar breakfast. For those who have two pairs of shoes in a year.

It is for those who do not have the money and have difficulty completing their studies. The purpose of the subsidy is to ensure their basic livelihood and successful completion of their university courses.

First of all,If this classmate is really a poor student and wants a mobile phone that he likes, then it seems that there is nothing wrong with it, but will it lose the original purpose of the subsidy? Because this measure doesn't seem to change his life for the better.

Secondly,Some students don't have a hard time staying at home, but they can find reasonable and legal relationships to get money. I remember having a roommate in college. Despite being from the countryside, the family is full of a sense of wealth.

There is an annual income of about 500,000 yuan. Students in this case are indeed not eligible to apply.

Definitely a rural person, his tuition and living expenses are raised by the whole village and the village chief. He was the first college student in the village to be admitted to the 985 school, and studying was indeed hard work, but it was never used as an excuse to complain about anything. On top of that, he's never applied for a poverty grant, and he's always been on a scholarship!

For the sake of fairness, the school stipulates that there is a conflict between the State Scholarship and the School Scholarship. If one takes one, they can't take the other, but he is an exception. The counselor and department head unanimously recommended him to participate, so he could get a scholarship within a year.

Some of the poor students' iPhones were not bought by him, but were given by elders or well-wishers other than his parents. But I think that since you all need to apply to become a poor student, life must be very drastic, so why not sell the expensive Apple phone and replace it with a relatively cheap domestic phone? In this way, you can not only avoid criticism, but also use the extra money from selling your mobile phone as your living expenses and tuition fees, isn't it a double win?

So I think it's definitely not appropriate to use an Apple mobile phone to apply for a subsidy for poor students, and if the family conditions are okay, it's better to give the quota to a real poor student who can't even afford a mobile phone!

I don't think that's reasonable, because using an iPhone doesn't mean she's not poor, and it's also possible that someone else funded her iPhone.

This is nothing, after all, not all people who use Apple phones are rich.

This thing actually has no effect, after all, it is everyone's own choice for almost the same person.

I think it's still very reasonable, because those things are supposed to be high-end luxury goods or something.

I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but if you don't, it's going to be controversial. In real life, the state has introduced many policies to help poor students receive better education. However, the selection of poor students has certain limitations in many cases.

But there are some hard and fast criteria that everyone should meet.

Poor students need to be helped to those who really need help. In real life, it is true that some families are very poor due to various accidents, and students in such families find it difficult to bear the pressure of receiving education because of financial problems. In this situation, the state's various policies to help poor students can be of great help to them.

In the process of selecting poor students, everyone wants to help those who really need help, rather than giving this help to those who are cheating or vain.

I think this is the most simple idea of the general public, everyone has never thought of occupying this resource by themselves, but they don't want other people who do not meet the standards to occupy this resource in violation of regulations.

I think this is a bit arbitrary, but it's not wrong. As for the fact that students who use iPhones cannot be rated as poor students, I personally think this is a rather arbitrary thing. Because in many cases, it is difficult for us to judge the authenticity of students' use of mobile phones, and it is also difficult to judge the true value of their mobile phones.

But I don't think this is wrong, because in real life, the Apple mobile phone can be said to be a luxury mobile phone brand to some extent.

synonymous with . For a person who applies for a poor student, using a high mobile phone is undoubtedly an insult to the identity of a poor student.

Of course, in real life, it is still necessary to judge whether a student can be rated as a poor student according to the actual situation. But if a person who uses ** Apple mobile phones is really rated as a poor student, the criticism and doubts caused by it may make people doubt its fairness and justice.

It's not right to do this, there has been an unfair situation, the mobile phone is not representative of the family situation, and at the same time it does not represent the identity of everyone, and a real investigation should be done.

To judge whether a student is a poor student, it should be judged based on comprehensive indicators such as the student's family situation and per capita income. The use of an Apple phone is also not a standard.

This is not right, because the iPhone may have been purchased by the student himself, and it is not representative of the family situation.

This is the right thing to do, the real poor students can't even afford a mobile phone for a few hundred yuan, let alone an Apple mobile phone.

Summary. Hello dear and happy to answer for you. You can't be rated as a poor student with an iPhone.

It's really inappropriate to use an iPhone to be rated as a poor student. Because Android thousand-yuan mobile phones can also meet the needs of RI commonly used machines, even second-hand iPhones have to be sold for thousands of yuan, in fact, it is a bit unreasonable for the definition of poor students.

Hello dear and happy to answer for you. You can't be rated as a poor student with an iPhone. It's really inappropriate to use an iPhone to be rated as a poor student.

Because Android thousand-yuan mobile phones can also meet the needs of RI commonly used machines, even second-hand iPhones have to be sold for thousands of yuan, in fact, it is a bit unreasonable for the definition of poor students.

The criteria for identifying poor students are those with special difficulties: orphaned and disabled students, children of martyrs, and students whose family members have been suffering from chronic illness, inability to work, or whose families have encountered natural disasters or emergencies, etc., and have no normal study and life; In poor rural areas, the main members of the family are old and frail, resulting in excessive economic burden, low labor force, and low economy. Users who use 3000 yuan mobile phones mean that there is a greater probability of opening ** members, content members, etc., and the added value is higher.

Therefore, from the perspective of the shopping platform, the group of students who use a mobile phone of about 3,000 yuan and have no income will be considered as a consumer group with superior family conditions. Whether you use a brand new iPhone or a second-hand iPhone, you are regarded as a mid-to-high-end user in some shopping platforms, which means that you have good spending power.

Isn't there it in the student handbook, what are the student aids**, and there are many national scholarships, etc., which are written in that booklet, so it's easy to see.

Student loans, grants. There are also various types of gold scholarships with an encouraging nature.

Even if his iPhone is fake, at least the reason why he uses an Apple phone may be because of vanity, so he feels that other brands of mobile phones are not worthy of him, so even after getting the money, he will use the money to satisfy his vanity, instead of doing something serious and supplementing the study materials, so if all aspects are considered, college students who use Apple phones should not be selected as poor students.

probably thinks that since you have the money to buy a good Apple phone, there must be no shortage of money. In fact, what to do with the money in the hands of the students is the student's business, but if it is regarded as a standard by relying on this, it is a bit unconvincing.

The price of Apple mobile phones is relatively high. If you are a college student, you can use an iPhone. Then his economic conditions are still okay.

Because Apple mobile phones** are more expensive, you can afford to buy an Apple mobile phone, and your family will not be too poor.