How ruthless is the emission gate that many car companies have been involved in?

In the past September, many auto companies in Europe and the United States were involved in the "emission gate" turmoil. However, in the face of this turmoil, each family has responded differently. Five years have passed, and the "emission gate" has still not come to an end.

In September 2019, a number of automotive groups were again held accountable for their "emissionsgate".

The two major German car giants, Volkswagen Group and Daimler Group, were "raided" by German prosecutors almost at the same time because of the "emission gate". Several current and former executives of the Volkswagen Group have been sued for "market manipulation", and Daimler AG has received a fine of 100 million euros (about 100 million yuan). Subsequently, a senior manager of Fiat Chrysler (FCA) was charged by the U.S. Department of Justice for allegedly lying to regulators about diesel emissions.

However, due to the very cooperative attitude of Daimler Group throughout the incident, German prosecutors have officially put an end to the group's "emissionsgate" scandal investigation after this fine.

After four years of being trapped in the "emissions gate", Volkswagen is still difficult to get out

Although it has been four years since the Volkswagen Group's "emissionsgate"**, various scandals continue to be revealed, and the solution of the problem still seems to be far away. Germany's "Frankfurter Review" said on September 26** that German prosecutors filed a lawsuit against Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess, former CEO Martin Wendern and Chairman Pan Shi on the 24th local time, accusing them of manipulating the "emissionsgate" incident in 2015. The Supervisory Board of Volkswagen Group issued a statement on the 25th denying the relevant allegations.

The defense counsel for the three also dismissed the charges as unfounded. At the same time, a German consumer organization filed a complaint with the court seeking financial compensation. But the public believes that the lawsuit is baseless.

On the 25th local time, in response to the class action lawsuit filed by the German consumer organization, the lawyer representative of Volkswagen Group said at a press conference: The class action lawsuit is not established, there are still many unknown factors in the settlement negotiations, and it is unlikely that a settlement will be reached.

The "emission gate" accelerates Daimler's transition to electrification

The Volkswagen Group is not alone in the "emissionsgate" accusations. Almost at the same time, Daimler AG received a fine of 100 million euros (about 100 million yuan). Similar to Volkswagen, Daimler's involvement in the "emissionsgate" is not a new topic.

Back in early 2016, the EPA asked Daimler to explain the emission levels of its combustion engine vehicles. In addition, Daimler AG is accelerating its electrification transition in order to meet the EU's increasingly stringent emission regulations, as the road to "tailpipe tampering" is blocked.

At this year's Frankfurt Motor Show, Kang Linsong, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Daimler AG and Global President of Mercedes-Benz Cars Group, announced the "Vision 2039": by 2022, Mercedes-Benz will achieve carbon neutrality in vehicle production in Europe; By 2030, electric models will account for more than 50% of Mercedes-Benz's new car sales; By 2039, Mercedes-Benz will strive to achieve carbon neutrality in its new vehicle lineup.

Mainly because this emission gate affects the sales of cars very much, so it is very ruthless.

Daimler AG received 100 million euros, and emissions gate will suffer from this situation.

This emission gate has actually affected a lot of companies, and many companies are facing a crisis of confidence.

Daimler AG received a fine of 100 million euros (about 100 million yuan).

As a result of the emission gate incident, many cars did not meet the gear standards, so many cars could not be sold.

It may be because the rumors are more powerful, and the emission gate will suffer when it comes to this situation.

If this event is involved, the sales of their brand will be greatly reduced.

Now that people are paying more and more attention to emissions, it will have a big impact.

Now environmental issues are gradually being put on the agenda, so many car companies have such a situation.

I don't know. JAC's "trump card business" lies in the production of commercial vehicles (light trucks, heavy trucks, etc.); But as early as 2016, they also set a good sales record of 10,000 units per month in the passenger car market. The rapidly growing SUV market became a breakthrough for JAC to enter the passenger car market at that time.

The surge in SUV market demand has led many independent brands to start making SUV models one after another. However, in the comparison of many models, the suspicion of "changing the soup without changing the medicine" of the JAC "Ruifeng" series has gradually been noticed by consumers. Let's take the Ruifeng S3, which was among the top three domestic small SUVs in 2014-2016.

The view changes again and again, and the powertrain responds to all changes with the same change. The lack of product power will naturally lead to the elimination of products from the market.

According to the data, the sales of JAC's SUV models in 2017** are in stark contrast to the prosperity of the domestic SUV market. The sharp decline in sales of SUV models also indirectly contributed to the year-on-year decline in the overall sales of JAC Motors (including commercial vehicles).

As the first Sino-foreign joint venture new energy vehicle project in China, JAC Volkswagen was once regarded as a "life-saving straw" for JAC. However, at least for now, the project has not brought much to the cake to JAC's new energy business. Although JAC's Volkswagen's first pure electric model, the Sihao E20X, has finally begun to show signs of entering the market after more than a year off the assembly line, in the past two years, the loss of JAC's Volkswagen project has reached 100 million yuan, which also accounts for about one-fifth of JAC's total loss in 2018.

It depends on the recent profitability of JAC.

Development should be a problem, and how long it lasts can only depend on the inside.

We don't know about this, he didn't make much profit, and he might have to rely on parts to do business.

Look at the internal marketing means and turnover.

I don't know exactly how long it will last, but it's not going to be good anyway.

Inside, it feels like it won't last long.

It won't last long, and this incident has had a big impact on it.

It won't last long, and it's the end of the crossbow now.

Let's take a look at JAC's income and expenditure.

It may not last long, and people are becoming less and less confident in it.

It's not clear about the specifics, but it should be fine.