Check out for ten days, the hood is broken, do you use it? When the house is handed over, the landlo

If the hood is not broken when you check out, then you do not need to pay for it. Because if the landlord inspects the house in person, there will be no problems, and it is better to have evidence that the landlord inspected the house in person at that time, and there is no damage.

I think it's been ten days since I checked out, and I don't need to pay for the broken hood, because the landlord has already inspected the house in person when I handed over the house. He has already passed the acceptance, and no matter how bad it is, it has nothing to do with you.

It has been 10 days since I checked out, and there is no need to pay for the broken hood, because the landlord has already experienced the house when the house is handed over, and it was intact at that time.

It's been 10 days since I checked out, and the landlord has personally inspected it when I handed over the house. After a few days, the range hood is broken, and you don't need to compensate for this.

As long as you have withdrawn the house as required, the problem should not be related to you now, but if it is really your problem, there should be nothing to bear it on.

It depends on the specific situation, if it is indeed more serious, and then it is broken by yourself, it must be accompanied.

The landlord personally inspected the house when handing over the house, and the landlord must be responsible for the aftermath and has nothing to do with you.

Because you checked out, you don't have to pay compensation when the landlord inspected that there was no problem, because the landlord tested.

It should not be used, the house has been delivered, and the delivery should have nothing to do with yourself.

This must not be accompanied, it has nothing to do with you, right?

It's been 10 days since I checked out, and if the hood wasn't broken at the time, I don't have to pay now.

It's been ten days since I quit the house, and the range hood is broken, so I don't have to pay for it. When the house was handed over, the house had already been conceded, and after letting Zheng Mingxiu leave, did he leave badly, and why would he accompany him if it was broken in the future?

If April Fool's Day isn't bad when you check out, it's none of your business.

You've been checking out for ten days before you find out that the range hood is broken. When I handed over the house, I let Weng Dong personally verify it, but I didn't find it, and now you don't have to pay.

When checking out, the range hood was pasted, and there was no need to pay for the breakage, and the landlord had already inspected the house when the house was delivered, and now they should bear the responsibility for the breakage.

It's been ten days since I checked out, do you use the range hood when you hand over the house, and the landlord will inspect the house in person, and if it is broken, it will definitely be compensated.

As long as it is reflected in the contract, everything is not a problem, if it is not mentioned in the contract, then it will be a dispute.

There are many problems similar to this in the purchase and sale of second-hand houses, and it is recommended to communicate with the owner to see if the loss can be minimized.

I hope it can help you, don't expect the range hood to change it for you, and it is important to be able to communicate well and leave other things in the house.

If the contract mentions the contents of the house, then there will definitely be a provision for liability for breach of contract, and it is not realistic to check out, and the law will not support it.

When handing over the house, as long as all your things are usable, and it may not be easy to use again, you don't have to worry about this, the main thing is that the real estate certificate is not fake, it's OK.

Hello! If the law is resolved, you can only sue, then it depends on whether you have a lot of lawsuits, in short, don't be reckless and have conflicts.

There is a premise for this question.

When you rent a house, you should have a lease agreement (or lease contract) with the landlord, which should indicate whether the facilities in the room are in good condition at the time of occupancy, and if the equipment (facilities are in good condition), then in the event of non-human failure, the repair cost should be borne by the user (tenant) (not all).

Then, it is up to you and the landlord to negotiate how much the tenant needs to bear, and all these procedures should be handled before you move in, otherwise once there is a dispute, they will fight each other. Officials could not intervene either. Because the tenancy relationship between you and the landlord is unclear.

It stands to reason that the tenant should not bear all the repair costs, because, when you move in, the range hood is not new, then, the early use before you move in is not you, and the early use will cause the range hood to depreciate.

If you really can't tell, you have to let the property step in.

Good luck!!

Article 220 of the Contract Law The lessor shall perform the maintenance obligation of the leased property, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Article 221 The lessee may require the lessor to repair the leased property within a reasonable period of time when the leased property needs to be repaired. If the lessor fails to perform the maintenance obligation, the lessee may repair it by itself, and the maintenance cost shall be borne by the lessor. If the use of the leased property is affected by the maintenance of the leased property, the rent shall be reduced or the lease term shall be extended accordingly.

So if you don't agree on who will pay for the repairs, you don't have to pay.

Other people's ideas: It should be the owner who is responsible for maintenance, if he refuses, you can only buy a second-hand one to use back, and take it away when you move!

My thoughts: You should tell your landlord that I rent your house for this price because you have these facilities. Is it good for me to rent someone else without anything?

I'm embarrassed to mention dozens of dollars. If you are in a hurry, you can also buy a second-hand one, put it there, and you tell her that you will compensate me if you use it! My aunt's house rented a house and the curtains were replaced by new ones.

She's just bullying you to be honest. What kind of law**, look at what you wrote about "her", just a shrew, this kind of person doesn't eat the law**, even if there is a law to follow, she may be more arrogant. I've seen a lot of people like this, and if I don't beat her, I keep splattering, and they're all university teachers

This is not something that the law can solve. The items in the house have not been damaged by man, and the homeowner should pay for the maintenance at his own expense, and the repair fee is one or twenty yuan, so it is unreasonable for you to pay for it. The court will not accept a case like yours, and the repair fee is only one or twenty yuan, which is still within the scope of disputes, and even the prosecution fee is not enough.

The ultimate solution is consultation. Depending on how you negotiate, if the landlord doesn't back down, you can not rent his room.

If you are useful, you should be half of a person, after all, if you rent his house, it is already second-hand, and if you have not used it, he should bear all of it.

Look at what kind of thing, it's always bad, then it's not reasonable! If you can't negotiate with the landlord, then leave!

I can't afford to provoke, I can afford to hide, and I moved away.

Can you not be funny? When you check out, the landlord doesn't ask you for a cleaning fee, which counts as you burn high incense.

It should be you who clean it yourself, but if it is broken, you should find the landlord to fix it.

The landlord cleans and pays the wages himself.

Isn't it all over by cleaning yourself?

It depends on how long you want to live, and don't wash it if it's short.

If you were introduced through an agent when you were looking for this house, it would be simple, and it would be easy to find an agent to coordinate. Otherwise, talk to the landlord again, there is always a way to solve everything, see whether to find after-sales maintenance of range hoods or find professional repairs yourself, and the cost should be borne by the landlord, the worst plan is AA system, and then discuss it well. It will always work out.

This has nothing to do with the agent, he can let the homeowner and you meet and negotiate, but does not bear any responsibility, you can find someone to repair it, after all, you are using it, right, find a lawyer and other methods, I believe it is indispensable to spend more money! Or the most promising thing for negotiation is the AA system.

Beat the landlord until he fixes it for you.

If you don't break it, you don't need to compensate, and the other party's unreasonable request doesn't need to be ignored. If the negotiation fails, you can sue for the return of the deposit.

As long as it is not intentionally damaged, there should be no right to withhold the deposit, which depends on how the rental contract is written at that time, so let's negotiate it.

Just let someone come over and repair the hood, and you pay for it.

I've been an agent for three years before, so I can tell you how to do these questions!

First: Did you rent a house through an agent or did you find a contract with the landlord online? You know this best.

If you go through an intermediary, you must sign the contract for the house before you sign it, and I guess you will solve it with the landlord yourself, so the agent will not give you any answer to this question.

After that, the house you move into is on the contract of the agent, and the old agent will write a sentence on the ground with additional clauses, all natural wear and tear of the walls, furniture and appliances will be repaired by the landlord. (I guess you don't have that??? There is also the right to deduct your deposit, and you also have the right to protect your own rights and interests, so how to protect your rights and interests, the only way to protect your rights and interests is to call the police and let the police solve it.

What you need to say is: "I shouldn't pay for the landlord if the natural wear and tear is made, and my deposit can be deducted if it is damaged" This is the key to the words, and if there are any additional questions that you don't understand!!

Didn't you pay off the deposit when you left? Didn't check.

Because the property right of the water heater belongs to the landlord, and it is naturally damaged during the rental period, of course, the landlord repairs it himself, so it is recommended that you notify the landlord to repair it as soon as possible so that it does not affect your use. You can also repair it yourself and deduct it when you pay the rent, provided that the landlord agrees.

Of course, the landlord repaired. Because you are renting his house and you are paying rent to the other party, the landlord should ensure that the facilities are normal during the rental period, and he is naturally damaged, not man-made damage, so the landlord should pay.

Count it as your own, and ask someone to fix it.

1. Your point about the air conditioner is broken, it is not true. We can simply reason, according to your point of view, your air conditioner will never be bad under normal use: because it was good yesterday, it will definitely not be bad tomorrow?

2. Regarding the use and maintenance of the equipment in the lease contract, the principle is: during the lease period, the lessor shall ensure that the house and its internal facilities can be used normally, and the lessor shall be responsible for repairing and restoring the original state or compensating for economic losses if the property and its facilities are intentionally or negligently damaged. It is also normal for tenants to use normally, but the air conditioner cannot be used normally due to aging or quality problems.

You, as the landlord, should hire a professional maintenance staff to find out the cause, and if it is caused by quality or aging problems, you should bear the cost of repairs. If the damage is intentional or negligent on the part of the tenant, the tenant is responsible. The above terms should be agreed in the lease contract, and if there is no agreement between the two of you, it is best to negotiate and settle it.

Before it can be determined that the tenant is intentional or negligent, the lessor should be legally responsible for the repairs. After the cause is ascertained, the corresponding responsibility shall be borne according to the determination of responsibility. 3. In the case of high temperature in summer, if you do not maintain the air conditioner, it can be determined that the lease conditions have changed fundamentally, and it should be determined that you have breached the contract first, resulting in the inability to continue to perform the lease contract.

Your reason is just that the air conditioning is good when renting. But now it's broken, isn't it normal? Why can't we repair it first, and then determine the responsibility of both parties after the cause is ascertained?

If the tenant is intentional or negligent in the process of use, he should naturally be held responsible, and if the negotiation fails, you can also sue to protect your rights and interests. Now you, as the lessor, only emphasize that the rental was intact, and now I don't care if it's broken, as an ordinary person, such a judgment is also illogical. It stands to reason that the heart is compared to the heart, the summer is hot, there is no air conditioning, how do people live?

Let's put yourself in their shoes.

Don't look at people, normal people, pack up your things and leave, what do you care about, after all, you took the money, but you can tell him when you recruit tenants, you have to wash your ...... before leaving

Must be cleaned, do you still have to ask?