Why are many people still not optimistic about agriculture after so many years?

The status of the peasants is still in the ninth rank, and only the pampered capitalists and bureaucrats can make a profit in agriculture, and there will be no exception in ten years. As a person who wants to make a little money, you have to get recognition from bureaucrats and capitalists of all stripes, and recognition is only possible if you can give them benefits.

Passing by linked to agriculture, our poor farmers are now in dire straits. What to raise and what to lose. I don't understand why. Meat**eggs** are cheaper than vegetables, I don't understand!

From channels to funds to land to peasants, the state has no control over. In order to control the CPI**, they will also buy grain reserves from abroad and be ready to put them on the market at any time to suppress agricultural products**. This is just a small point, when it comes to pig farmers are more miserable, this is not much to say, people who have a heart to understand the proportion of pigs in CPI and the national pig policy, it is completely a bloody trap.

Most people did not experience famine, and most of them suffered from amnesia. We must be prepared for danger in times of peace, protect farmland, and develop agricultural production.

Agriculture is the foundation of the country, and this fundamental premise is to ensure the stability of agriculture and prices in the city. Yes, everyone has to eat, but the grain ** is purchased by the state, do you know how the state controls the grain **? Grain prices are all purchased and sold in a unified manner.

What about those peasants who don't raise chickens and lay eggs for Mao? They would rather play cards than do farm work. At first, I thought they were lazy, but now that it's been more than a year, I know that farming is not the way out at all.

Deepen the contracting system. It is true that some people are bold enough to contract and invest, so that they can develop well.

Because more than nine and a half out of ten people are losing, and there are many people who make money to pick up dog urine and make it.

A lot of it is so-called on paper. In the specific operation of agriculture, the profit is very meager, and if you are not careful, you will lose a lot of money. Of course, if some people want to grow and breed some original vegetables and eggs by themselves, this is still okay. But there is too little room to make a profit on these.

Agriculture is the source, producing a variety of agricultural products; The market is the source and sells a variety of agricultural products. Personally, I believe that only by grasping the market can we succeed in agriculture.

Still use analytics? Without policy support, the deterioration of the natural environment and so on, I don't want to talk about it.

Small-scale farmers in urbanization have gone bankrupt and are no longer able to support their families.

A pound of food is not as valuable as a bottle of water, how can you make me optimistic.

Agriculture is the foundation, providing cheap agricultural products and a more stable society.

It's a big deal to go home and farm, it's too much information!

Because there are those big granaries abroad.

Now there are many people working hard in big cities, some choose to return to the countryside to do agriculture, the result is more losses, less money, many people are not optimistic about agriculture, because now China's agriculture has not carried out large-scale mechanization, completely rely on labor, invest more energy, but the return is less, there are many people choose to go back to the home to raise chickens and ducks, but many people do not have the corresponding breeding experience, if you encounter some flu.

This will lead to the mass death of chickens and ducks, and all the investment will be wasted.

The country's agriculture has not yet formed a scale, and it belongs to some small peasant economies.

And in remote places, the transportation is not developed, the most important thing is that there is a problem with the first chain of agriculture, that is, the crops produced in the field can not be delivered to the hands of customers in time, and the loss of the whole transportation process is large, as a result, farmers do not make money, and the vegetables bought by customers are more expensive, so it is necessary to vigorously develop rural infrastructure, and large-scale planting is carried out, so as to make agriculture profitable.

At present, the thinking of many people in rural areas has not changed a lot, and there are only some old people left in the rural areas, and these people's thinking is relatively outdated, which will affect the development of the entire agriculture, so young people will not stay in the countryside to grow crops, but choose to go to the first-tier cities.

I think we must be cautious in agriculture, if you don't have experience and a lot of capital investment, it is difficult to have a harvest.

The development of domestic agriculture is difficult, but on the other hand, the development of foreign agricultural areas is very good, especially the animal husbandry planting industry has used large-scale mechanization, only a small amount of labor is needed, but a large amount of land can be planted, and in foreign countries are some specialized farmers, but on the other hand, a lot of land is concentrated in the hands of many farmers, resulting in large-scale planting has become a problem, but I believe that with the continuous development of technology, the country's vigorous investment, agriculture will become more and more popular.

Farming in the countryside is not very profitable, although it will not be starved to death, it is disrespectful and not high, and now many young people do not like to engage in agriculture and are not optimistic. Because the reality is indeed that agriculture is the most basic link, but it is the least profitable link, resulting in many people beginning to flow to the secondary industry, the tertiary industry service industry. <>

Agriculture itself is some primary agricultural products, and primary agricultural products are worthless, such as corn common in the north and rice common in the south, which are not high. When the first pound of corn may reach one pound, it is the time when the first is relatively high, few years can reach such a price, the yield of an acre of land is basically about 500 kilograms, and the income level may be 1000 yuan. Because the finished rice you buy in the supermarket may only be 2 yuan 5 on average, how much do you think an initial agricultural product, rice grains, can it be worth?

It is because of not making money that many people are unwilling to do agriculture-related work, although he does not make money, but he is very hard, after all, farming is to work for himself, the land must be weeded when the grass grows, when the time comes, it is necessary to sow seeds, to harvest in autumn, and to regularly weed and repel insects, these are all jobs. And how can working in the open air be so comfortable all the time? It is very hot in the summer until autumn, and in the evening, it rains again, and in the morning there is dew again, and in the morning and evening, when it is coolerThere is no good working environment, there is usually no dew, and the weather is very hot, which is very hard.

It is normal for young people to be reluctant to do it, because the level of agricultural income is indeed lower than that of other industries, and if you take the same amount of time to work, you don't need too much, earning 3,000 yuan a month and 100 yuan a day. This person works for 3 months, and it is easy to exceed the income of this person who has worked hard for a year.

Because agriculture is affected by the natural environment, and it can't make a lot of money, the cost is relatively high, and the market concept of some agriculture is backward.

This is due to the fact that agricultural development will be limited by many conditions, will be affected by weather factors, and will also be affected by financial factors, so agricultural development is not particularly good.

There will be many problems in the process of agricultural development, so they are not optimistic.

In recent years, so many people who have invested in agriculture have failed, will it have an impact on the development of agriculture? On the whole, although there are many failures in agricultural investment, it should not affect the development of China's agriculture.

First of all, in the past few decades, a lot of agricultural investment has failed, in addition to the management and operation problems of these enterprises themselves, mainly closely related to the risk characteristics of agriculture, as an industry with the dual risk of market risk and natural risk, agriculture compared with industry and service industry, itself has weak quality, and this double risk will also bring more complex problems to enterprise management, so the success rate of investment in agriculture itself is lower than that of secondary and tertiary industries. <>

Secondly, the threshold of agricultural investment is relatively low, in recent years, due to China's policy bias for agriculture, with the encouragement and support of the country, a large number of social capital poured into the countryside, in the environment of market competition, capital will also fight each other, after the big waves, the weaker enterprises will naturally be eliminated, although this is more cruel for the failure of enterprises, but for agricultural development, the competition mechanism ensures the survival of high-quality capital, but is conducive to the long-term development of agriculture. <>

Again agricultural products and food rigid growth and environmental and spiritual consumption demand to bring more and more investment opportunities, China's consumption is in a stage of transformation, consumer demand for high-quality products, requiring the production end needs to emerge more high-quality agricultural product brands, on the other hand, now the demand for spiritual consumption in the city has also promoted farmhouses, picking gardens and other forms of leisure agriculture, making full use of the versatility of agriculture, providing a new path for agricultural development.

Finally, the strong support and guidance of China's current urban-rural dual system still exists, rural backward cities is an indisputable fact, such unbalanced development, has become the biggest obstacle to China's overall well-off, in order to solve this problem, China's support for agriculture in recent years is increasing, the rapid and healthy development of agriculture is not only the urgent hope of farmers, but also the inevitable requirements of the times. <>

If so many people fail, many people will not choose to enter the agricultural industry again, which will definitely have a certain negative impact, but the epidemic is like this, and the global economy is falling behind.

No, because although there are many people who fail to invest, more people still succeed, and they have promoted the development of the agricultural economy through bringing goods or new forms of selling goods, and also driven a group of farmers to get rich.

It will have an impact on the development of agriculture, because repeated investment failures will prevent people from investing in agriculture that will affect the yield and market share of agriculture.

I don't think it's that agriculture has no value, or the output value of agriculture is very low, if a person in the countryside and the big city pay the same effort, but the income in the big city is higher than the rural area, for example, a person in the countryside farming, may only earn a few thousand yuan a year, this does not include the cost of fertilizer and labor, but a person works in a big city, then the salary is high, it can even reach 10,000 yuan, that is, work in a big city for a month, or even when working in the countryside for a year, I'm sure everyone knows what to do.

Now there are only some old people left in the countryside, because they can't find jobs in the big cities, so they can only stay in the countryside, and they plant very little land, so we can see that a lot of land in the countryside is deserted, and there are very few young people, because young people will choose to work in big cities, and even many people end up in big cities, China's urbanization process is very fast, and high-rise buildings are uprooted in an instant.

In fact, the value of agriculture is very large, but the production efficiency is low, because many farmers only have two or three acres of land, and the value created in these fields is not very high, and on the other hand, the United States and other capitalist countries, they are using a lot of mechanization, that is to say, 1% of farmers can provide the whole country with food, so now the countryside has begun to implement land integration, and in the future, a large number of mechanization will be promoted, which can greatly increase the output value.

The development of agriculture did not happen overnight. Agriculture is very important to every country, a country without agriculture, it may be held back by other countries at any time, so the country should also vigorously develop and promote agriculture, so that agriculture to create higher benefits, on the one hand, the corresponding subsidies to farmers, on the other hand, to encourage everyone to contract land, the integration of different land resources, so that we can leak and sell to create more value, but also for the benefit of the country and the people, I believe that in the future China's agriculture from big to strong.

Not really; Personally, I think that for many people who leave the countryside, they want to work hard to broaden their horizons, enrich their knowledge, and strive to improve their personal value, so as to achieve better development.

In fact, it's not more, it's just that his income in the countryside is relatively low, and most farmers also choose to farm, and the young man Pei Huai Bang wants to have a better future, so he is worthy of going to the city to work.

No. It's just that they feel that engaging in agriculture is very shameless. I don't think they have to think that way.

1) It is necessary to take industry as the leading factor and regard heavy industry as the focus of China's economic construction, and at the same time we must pay full attention to the development of agriculture and light industry.

2) It is necessary to develop the national economy on the basis of agriculture, with industry as the leading factor, and in the order of agriculture.

3) Adhere to the policy of "walking on two legs", that is, emphasizing the development of industry and agriculture, and at the same time lifting heavy industry and light spine industry, and at the same time developing ** industry and local industry, and so on.

The relationship between heavy industry and light industry, agriculture.

Heavy industry is the focus of China's construction. It has been decided that priority must be given to the development of the means of production. However, the production of the means of subsistence, especially food, must not be neglected as a result.

If there is not enough food and other necessities of life, first of all, it will not be possible to feed the workers, so what is there to talk about developing heavy industry? Therefore, the relationship between heavy industry, light industry, and agriculture must be properly handled.

We have not made a mistake of principle in handling the relationship between heavy industry, light industry, and agriculture. We did better than the USSR and some Eastern European countries. We do not have a problem with the long-term failure of grain production in the Soviet Union to reach the highest level before the revolution, as in some Eastern European countries due to the too uneven development of light and heavy industries.

Their one-sided focus on heavy industry and neglect of agriculture and light industry led to insufficient goods on the market and unstable currency. We pay more attention to agriculture and light industry. We have always grasped agriculture and developed agriculture, and have fairly ensured the grain and raw materials needed for the development of industry.

Our daily commodities are relatively abundant, and prices and currencies are stable.

Our problem now is that we must appropriately adjust the proportion of investment in heavy industry and agriculture and light industry, and develop agriculture and light industry more. In this way, is heavy industry no longer dominant? It's still the main thing, and it's still the focus of investment.

However, the proportion of investment in agriculture and light industry should be a little heavier.

What about the results of the aggravation? As a result, the people's living needs can be better supplied, and the accumulation of capital can be increased more quickly, so that heavy industry can be developed more and better. Heavy industry can also accumulate, but, under our current economic conditions, light industry and agriculture accumulate more and faster.

Here a question arises, do you really think about the development of heavy industry or hypothetical, do you think a little more or a little less? If you think hypothetically, or if you think a little worse, then hit agriculture and light industry and invest less in them. If you really want to, or think very strongly, then you should pay attention to agriculture and light industry, so that there will be more raw materials for grain and light industry, and more funds will be invested in heavy industry in the future.

We can now develop heavy industry in two ways: one is to develop less agriculture and light industry, and the other is to develop more agriculture and light industry. In the long run, the former approach would make heavy industry develop less and slower, or at least on a less solid footing, and would not be able to settle the ledger in a few decades. The latter approach would lead to the development of heavy industry more and faster, and would make the basis for its development more solid by ensuring the needs of the people's livelihood.