Why is it said that it takes three generations to cultivate a nobleman

The ancestors of the nobility may also be farmers, and through continuous hard work, they understand the hardships of life, so that they can make up their minds to put forward the fate of the poor, and hope from generation to generation, one day, this accumulated belief will change the fate of a family and create the aristocratic life of the next generation.

As the saying goes: no more than three generations of rich, no more than five volts of poverty. In other words, no matter how rich you are, it is rare for three generations of children and grandchildren to be nourished. As long as the poor work hard, it is impossible to be poor for five generations!

The first generation provides capital potential (e.g. real estate, e.g. knowledge);

the second generation creates physical capital;

The third generation generates spiritual values.

Sometimes 10 generations can't be trained.

One generation of 25 years, three generations of 75 years to cultivate a nobleman.

It takes three generations to cultivate a nobleman, and it only takes one person to destroy a nobleman. I don't know who said that, but I've heard it

I think Tolstoy said it.

First generation"Poor"。What if you are so poor that you can't even eat, let alone get a higher education? First solve the problem of food and clothing, part-time work, selling coolies, doing some low-level work, unskilled work, and exploitative work, just to have something to eat.

Mixed well, through their own efforts, not only solved their own food and clothing problems, but also saved a lot of material wealth to leave to the next generation.

Second generation"Essence. When parents have money, they want to make up for what they have lost, so that their children can eat well, dress well, receive higher education, and practice elite training. Children have their own careers and status, but they are also passively accepted under the great pressure of their parents, and they can also see the hardships of their older parents, and they dare not do what they want, so they don't have the energy and heart to play what they like, so they can only continue to work hard.

Third generation"Elegant. The children of the third generation have gone through the hard work of the last two generations of parents, they have not seen the hardships of their parents, and they have lived in a superior environment since childhood, and they do not have to be forced by life, nor do they have to worry about the difficult past, and even the next few generations do not have to worry about life, what do they play? Playing elegant, playing economics, playing philosophy, playing literature, playing some things that are inconceivable in the eyes of ordinary people, useless things, things that cannot be eaten, drunk, or supported, then the aristocracy is born, they have become veritable aristocrats, there is no sense of fame and fortune, there is no sense of crisis, what they make is the natural thing, the thing that promotes the development of mankind.

One generation of 25 years, three generations of 75 years to cultivate a nobleman.

In some Western countries, aristocracy not only represents the superiority of life and the control of power, but also means responsibility and responsibility, which requires the accumulation of several generations to form an aristocracy materially and spiritually.

If the rich cannot cultivate the correct attitude towards life of their offspring, they are likely to squander their wealth, so there are no more than three generations of wealth.

said. These two proverbs show two very different values of life and wealth that different people have.

Britain spares no expense in cultivating aristocratic education, because they believe that imparting knowledge, learning knowledge, and cultivating good habits and character are inseparable, which is why it takes three generations of British people to cultivate a nobleman. These nurtured children, who have grown up in a respectable environment since childhood, will pay attention to the details around them, so they can also have a clearer understanding of the changing personnel of society than their peers.

Do you agree with this method of aristocratic education and cultivation?

On the one hand, there are some words and deeds in ordinary life, and on the other hand, it depends on the stricter system in Britain.

Usually after the aristocracy has become a nobleman, there must be a group of people with excellent brains, and they will vigorously train the next generation.

Because each generation of the British aristocracy had a very good education and sufficient economic level, it has been maintained, which is also their tradition there.

Three generations of nobles and a hundred years of people are the same thing. The education and cultivation of both nobles and saints and gentlemen is not an easy task, and it must be achieved through the efforts of several generations.

Rich but three generations is the same as defeat, from luxury to thrift. Children who grow up in honey jars, stretch out their hands for food and open their mouths, are too dependent, and are waited on by others for everything, and their self-care ability is very poor. One generation is worse than the next, and within three generations, they will all become second-rate people who are lazy and lazy.

That's it, that's it.