Explanation of terms for process evaluation, explanation of terms for summative evaluation

Process evaluation is an evaluation carried out in order to understand the effect of the dynamic process, timely feedback information, timely adjustment, and continuous improvement of the plan and program in order to successfully achieve the expected purpose in the process of planning and implementing educational and teaching activities.

It promotes the process of student development through curricular activities. There are various evaluation methods: observation, communication, testing, practical operation, work display, self-evaluation and mutual evaluation can be used.

It can reflect the differences in students' learning level, learning ability, and learning foundation, and the new curriculum requires the establishment of an evaluation system to promote the all-round development of students' teachers. Among them, the evaluation that promotes the all-round development of students is the core content of the entire evaluation system. The process evaluation method has changed the previous test evaluation and has a strong pertinence

Teaching mode. From focusing on teachers' teaching to focusing on students' learning, from traditional teacher-centered to student-centered, students can choose the knowledge they need and set their own learning goals according to their own cognitive structure and learning style. Therefore, the evaluation method is mainly based on personal self-evaluation; The content of the evaluation is not the amount of geographical knowledge mastered by students, but the evaluation of students' ability to learn geographical knowledge independently and cooperative learning.

spirit, etc. Important features of process evaluation.

Focus on the learning process. Students will adopt different learning styles in the process of learning, and different learning styles will lead to different learning outcomes. However, the existing evaluation methods and evaluation tools focus more on the evaluation and measurement of the learning results produced by the superficial learning mode, and the learning results caused by the deep learning mode are either not paid attention to or cannot be evaluated, thus forming a blind spot of evaluation.

This is an important factor that leads students to adopt a superficial or achievement-based learning style. The result is a vicious circle of "superficial (achievement) learning and low-level learning results - superficial (achievement) learning". Process evaluation focuses on the learning style of students in the learning process, and guides the learning style of students to a deeper direction through the evaluation of learning methods.

Definition. Course evaluation refers to an activity that systematically collects relevant information and adopts various qualitative and quantitative methods to make value judgments and seek ways to improve the planning, implementation, and results of the course according to certain evaluation standards.

Meaning of course evaluation::

Course evaluation is a process of value judgment. Value judgment requires that the value concept and subjective desire of the evaluator be reflected on the basis of the description of facts. Different evaluation subjects will have different judgments on the same thing or activity due to their own needs and concepts.

There are many ways in which courses are evaluated. It can be both quantitative and qualitative, and educational testing or measurement is only one of the methods and does not represent the whole process of course evaluation.

The subjects of curriculum evaluation include various elements of the curriculum, such as "planning, implementation, and results of the curriculum". In other words, the scope of curriculum evaluation is very broad, it includes not only the curriculum plan itself, but also the teachers, students, and schools involved in the implementation of the curriculum, as well as the results of curriculum activities, that is, the development of students and teachers.

Basic Types of Course Evaluations:

1. According to the different evaluation objects, the course evaluation in the broad sense can be divided into student evaluation, teacher evaluation, school evaluation, and curriculum evaluation in the narrow sense.

2. According to the different evaluation subjects, the course evaluation can be divided into self-evaluation and external evaluation.

3. According to the different purposes of evaluation, course evaluation can be divided into diagnostic evaluation, formative evaluation and summative evaluation.

4. According to the different reference standards of evaluation or evaluation feedback strategies. Course evaluation can be divided into absolute evaluation, relative evaluation and intra-individual difference evaluation.

Summative evaluation terminology explanation: Summative evaluation, also known as summative evaluation, is the evaluation of a student's learning outcome at the end of a large learning stage, a semester or a course.

Features of summative evaluation.

1. The purpose of summative evaluation is to comprehensively determine the greater results achieved by students in a course or an important part of the course, so as to evaluate students' performance or provide evidence for the placement of students.

2. Summative evaluation focuses on students' mastery of the entire content of a course, and focuses on measuring the degree to which students achieve the teaching objectives of the course.

3. The summary level of summative evaluation is generally higher, the scope of the test or test content is wider than that of Hu Zhi, and each question includes many basic knowledge, skills and abilities that constitute the topic.

The role of summative evaluation.

1. Evaluate students' academic performance.

In school work, summative evaluation is most often used to assess students' academic performance, and teachers determine and mark students' progress and the extent to which they have achieved their teaching goals.

2. Predict the likelihood of success in the subsequent teaching process.

The results of summative evaluations are also often used to predict whether students are likely to succeed in a subsequent course or in a teaching process.

Summative evaluation, also known as summative evaluation and post-event evaluation, is generally an evaluation carried out to understand the final effect of teaching activities after a period of teaching activities. Examinations and assessments for each subject at the end of the semester or at the end of the semester belong to this kind of evaluation, and the purpose of this is to check whether the student's academic performance has finally reached each subjectTeaching Objectives: Confessionrequirements.

Summative evaluation is based on the pre-set teaching objectives, and evaluates the degree to which the evaluation object has achieved the goal, that is, the teaching effect. Summative evaluation focuses on the overall degree of students' mastery of a certain subject, with a high level of generalization and a wide range of test content, which is often conducted in the middle of the semester or at the end of the semester, and the number of times is small.

Summative evaluation focuses on the results, through which Mori Qi makes a comprehensive identification of the person being evaluated, distinguishes the grades, and evaluates the effectiveness of the entire teaching activity.

Summative evaluation means summative evaluation, post-hoc evaluation.

Summative evaluation is generally an evaluation conducted after the teaching activity has been completed in order to understand the final effect of the teaching activity. The examinations and assessments of each subject at the end of the semester or at the end of the school year belong to this kind of evaluation, and the purpose of this is to check whether the student's academic performance has finally met the requirements of the teaching objectives of each subject.

Summative evaluation focuses on the results, so as to make a comprehensive identification of the person being evaluated, distinguish the grades, and evaluate the effectiveness of the entire teaching activity. Summative evaluation is based on the pre-set teaching objectives, and evaluates the degree to which the evaluation object achieves the goal, that is, the teaching effect.

Relationship with diagnostic, formative evaluation of liquid valuation:

Evaluation is an essential component of the teaching and learning process, and the three types of evaluation are not mutually exclusive, they are interrelated and interpenetrating. This is because any kind of work is continuous, and the division of stages is also relative, and both formative and summative evaluations are diagnostic. Moreover, since the fundamental purpose of evaluation is to promote work, Mori is promoting development.

Therefore, any evaluation has a formative nature, and an evaluation without a diagnosis is not a real scientific evaluation, but only a subjective conjecture, and without a formative evaluation, the meaning of evaluation is lost. Whenever a teacher adopts one of these forms of assessment, students should be clear about the purpose of the assessment, how it will be conducted, and what the criteria for evaluation will be.

The above content refers to: Encyclopedia - Summative Evaluation.

Formative evaluation terms are explained as follows:

Formative assessment refers to the evaluation carried out in the teaching process to understand the learning situation of students and find problems in teaching in time. Formative assessment is often conducted in the form of informal examinations or unit tests.

The test must be developed taking into account all the important objectives of the unit. Through formative assessment, teachers can keep abreast of students' progress in learning and obtain continuous feedback during the teaching process, which can provide a reference for teachers to adjust their teaching plans and improve teaching methods at any time.

Review features::

Formative assessment is "an evaluation of a student's learning process with the aim of identifying the student's potential and improving and developing the student's learning". The task of formative assessment is to "evaluate the student's performance in the daily learning process, the results achieved, and the development of the emotions, attitudes, strategies, etc. that are reflected in the student's daily learning process."

Its purpose is to motivate students to learn, help students effectively regulate their learning process, so that students can gain a sense of achievement, enhance self-confidence, and cultivate the spirit of cooperation. "Formative evaluation does not simply start from the needs of the evaluator, but pays more attention to the needs of the evaluator, attaches importance to the learning process, and attaches importance to the students' experience in learning; Emphasis is placed on the interaction between people, the interaction of multiple factors in evaluation, and the communication between teachers and students.

In formative assessment, the teacher's responsibility is to determine the task, collect information, discuss with the students, infiltrate the teacher's guiding role in the discussion, and evaluate with the students.

Summary. 1.Evaluation and measuring.

There are technical evaluation, asset evaluation, tax evaluation, credit evaluation, psychological evaluation, project evaluation, risk assessment, undergraduate teaching evaluation, etc.

Concept: The behavior and process of professional institutions and personnel, in accordance with national laws, regulations and asset valuation standards, according to specific purposes, following appraisal principles, in accordance with relevant procedures, selecting appropriate value types, using scientific methods, analyzing, estimating and issuing professional opinions on asset value.

The first assessment of terminology explanations.

1.Evaluation and measuring.

There are technical evaluation, asset evaluation, tax evaluation, credit evaluation, psychological evaluation, project evaluation, risk assessment, undergraduate teaching evaluation, etc.

Concept: Professional institutions and personnel, in accordance with national laws, regulations and asset appraisal guidelines, according to specific purposes, follow the principles of valuation, according to the relevant procedures, select appropriate value types, use scientific methods, the value of assets into the socks into the socks to call for analysis, estimation and professional opinions of the behavior and process.

Literary criticism, also known as "literary criticism", not only refers to the scientific research activities that use certain theories and methods to carry out, experience, and evaluate various literary phenomena, but also refers to a style of articles that reflect such research results. Its mission is to reveal the aesthetic value and ideological significance of artistic phenomena, and to improve the level of literary and artistic creation; It should also help readers to understand the works correctly, cultivate and improve readers' artistic appreciation ability and healthy artistic taste.

Literary criticism includes poetry criticism, ** review, prose review, drama review, film and television review, etc. Film is a collection of screenwriters, directors, actors, cinematographers, art, editing, costumes, props, makeup, lighting, stunts equal to a kind of collective creation of a comprehensive art, film and television criticism can not only make comprehensive comments on many aspects, but also focus on a certain aspect.

Literary criticism is different from intellectual criticism in general. The object of ideological commentary is social life and the various ideological problems that people show in their lives and work, and the purpose is to help people improve their ideological understanding and distinguish between right and wrong. It can be argued through a variety of materials, as long as it sticks to the point you are trying to make.

The object of literary criticism is literary works (**, poetry, prose, drama, picture album, film and television, etc.); The purpose of the review is to improve the level of reading and appreciation through the discussion and evaluation of its ideological content, creative style, artistic characteristics, etc., and of course it is possible to cite and cite various materials for argumentation when commenting, but the various materials cited on the side should be related to literary works, and the materials used in literary criticism are basically from the literary works themselves.

In addition, literary criticism is different from general analysis of works. Of course, from a certain point of view, literary criticism should first be based on the analysis of the work, without analyzing how to comment; And the analysis itself naturally contains the evaluation of the work. However, there is still a difference, and the analysis of the work focuses on talking about the work "as it is"; The comments focus on "why it is like this" and "whether it is good or not".

<> Basic Definitions. 1.Criticism or argumentation.

2.Critical or argumentative articles. In newspapers and periodicals, including editorials, short reviews, reviews, editors' notes, etc.

Detailed explanation. Criticism, discussion.

Critical and argumentative articles.

Consider, consider.

Negotiate; Consult.

In the volume of "Tales of the Three Kingdoms": "The three invited Ji Ping into the cabinet and commented on the killing of Cao Cao." The seventh and fifth chapter of "The Words of the Golden Bottle Plum": "These times I can't sleep and sleep unsteadily, the pillow is cold, the lamp is turned off, and I am dizzy, who to comment to alone, and I can't let go of the person in my heart in every way." ”

Where it is still discussed.

Most of the fame is slow, don't run away from your life, there are early successes, and there are late arrivals; Those who become early may not be successful, those who arrive late may not be unattainable, they cannot be young and self-assured, and they cannot give up when they are old. ”

Example. <>