Has Tang Qianling been excavated or not! 》？

No, Guo Moruo and others applied for digging but it is said that *** did not agree, so it was shelved now.

No, *** in a word, leave something for future generations, so it has not been dug since the 50s.

No, it is said that there is not even a thief hole.

The owner's supplementary note should be: the only husband and wife emperor burial mausoleum.

Contemptible people believe that the reason why Qianling has failed to excavate many times is:

National and national treasures

Qianling, in the face of man-made theft and excavation for many times, an important reasonAll Chinese dynasties had the practice of protecting the mausoleums of previous dynastiesAnd the blow to grave stealing and digging is very hugeAnd that is to sayIn peacetime, if anyone wants to attack the idea of Qianling, even the high-sounding "golden captains" will be punished by the terrible laws of the coming dynasty. And the head falls directly to the ground.

Therefore, during the existence of the dynasty, it was impossible to directly open the Qianling。Moreover, the volume of the Qianling Tomb is very large, and the various riches buried in it must be very largeThere are also all kinds of righteous people among the people, who are concerned about the existence of the Qianling Tomb, so if someone carries a shovel and wants to dig the mausoleum, isn't it a huge provocation to law and justice?

The direction is wrong, there is no need for tools

In addition,Even in the war years, the theft of Qianling was not an easy thingBecause of the huge volume of Qianling, it requires a large number of manpower, and after unified deployment, etc., this is not something that ordinary people can doSo at the end of the Tang Dynasty, Huangchao. Wen Tao was able to concentrate a large number of troops everywhere and open the tombs of the Tang Emperor everywhere as cans. Then there were ordinary people who coaxed the seedlings.

I ran to the Imperial Tomb to pick up the leak.

But in this way, the Qianling Tomb was still not stolenThat's because Huang Chao's army reversed the direction of the tomb. So in the opposite direction, a huge ditch was dug in vain, and then became the laughing stock of future generations。SoWithout the support of modern exploration technology, it is not easy to excavate the imperial tombs quickly and efficiently.

And without the participation of TNT and modern construction machinery, it will also make the theft and excavation of the imperial tomb face huge engineering and technical problems, and even without the participation of Luoyang shovel, it will make people worry。Therefore, it can also be said that without the support of modern science and technology, it is not easy to excavate the Qianling TombYou must know that if someone mobilizes the army on a large scale to dig the tomb, it will be happy for other warlords in the troubled times!

It's because her mausoleum is more dangerous, there are many mechanisms in it, and once people come into contact with it, they are easy to die, and there is no way to steal property, and it will be gone.

There are records that the tombs of Wu Zetian and Li Zhi have been stolen many times, but every time the tomb robbers rob the tomb, there will be a thunderstorm on the night of the tomb, so no one dares to rob the tomb after that. There are reasons why no one succeeds, first, the Qianling Tomb is built on the mountain, which is difficult to steal, and second, there are many organs in the tomb.

This is because Wu Zetian's mausoleum is very secretive, and there are many mechanisms in the mausoleum, which can easily trigger the mechanism and lead to death, so many tomb robbers eventually died.

If you want to steal Wu Zetian's mausoleum, you need strong technology to support, there are many mechanisms in Wu Zetian's mausoleum, if there is not enough technical support, it will destroy some things in Wu Zetian's tomb, so it will be gone.

Because there are many traps in Wu Zetian's mausoleum, ordinary people can't get in, so even after many excavations, no results have been achieved.

According to the relevant data analysis, it has not been stolen, but after the latest archaeology, it is believed that it may have been stolen.

It was excavated, but it was not dug up.