What does the severing of the connection between matter and motion lead to?

Splitting the relationship between matter and motion leads to two kinds of errors, one metaphysical (stillness) and the other idealistic (spiritual-movement). Splitting the relationship between motion and rest leads to two errors: metaphysical invariance, which exaggerates relative stillness and denies absolute motion, and relativist sophistry, which exaggerates absolute motion and denies relative rest.

Matter and movement are intimately linked. Matter is the material in motion, motion is the fundamental property and mode of existence of matter, and secondly, motion is the movement of matter, and matter is the subject of motion. In short, matter is the material of motion, motion is the movement of matter, motion is the fundamental attribute and mode of existence of matter, matter is the main body of motion, the two are inseparable, and it is wrong to talk about motion without matter or to talk about matter without motion, and it belongs to the content of dialectics.

b, to talk about matter without motion, to think that matter does not move, so it is metaphysical materialism.

c Talking about movement without matter, believing that consciousness is the subject of movement, and denying that matter is the subject of movement, leads to idealism.

Metaphysics. Motion is absolute, and matter is produced in motion. Metaphysics is characterized by looking at the world from an isolated, static, one-sided, superficial point of view, and denying the doctrine that materialist dialectics advocates that things develop due to internal contradictions.

The idea of metaphysics was born in antiquity. In Europe, it was popular from the second half of the 15th century to the 18th century. At that time, scientists divided the natural world into various parts and examined them in a grouped way from the outside.

This method of thinking, transplanted from the natural sciences to philosophy by Bacon and Locke, created the metaphysical limitations of philosophy at that time. In the history of philosophy, it refers to philosophy that studies extrasensory, extra-empirical objects. It also sometimes refers to the study of philosophical ontology.

Some idealism is still commonly used in modern times"Metaphysics. "to accuse materialism.

bMetaphysical materialism c. Idealism.

If the relationship between matter and motion is severed, there are two wrong tendencies.

It is metaphysical thought to admit only matter and not motion.

To admit only the movement and not to recognize the material is to fall into idealism.

There are two wrong tendencies in the relationship between motion and stillness.

Acknowledging only stillness and not motion is a metaphysical view of stillness.

To admit only the movement without the stillness would be to fall into relativism and sophistry.

I hope to adopt it.

The dialectical relationship between matter and motion:

Matter and motion are intimately linked and inseparable. First of all, matter is the material that moves, and motion is the fundamental property of matter, the mode of existence of matter. Secondly, motion is the movement of matter, and matter is the subject of motion.

Metaphysics is wrong in this matter: it only recognizes matter and denies motion, and talks about matter without motion. The dialectical relationship between matter and motion is severed.

Movement refers to the general changes and processes of things, marking the dynamic process of things that fluctuate. Rest is the relative state of motion. It is relative, not eternal.

In philosophy (materialist dialectics), it is said that "motion is absolute, and stillness is relative", which is to the effect that the "change" of things happens all the time, and the "non-change" is temporary, or just that the change is not obvious. The meaning of motion, rest, and relative in philosophy is different from that in physics.

The relationship between motion and stillness: Materialist dialectics holds that motion and rest are dialectically unified. For one, there is a difference between motion and stillness.

Motion is the fundamental property and mode of existence of matter, and it includes all changes. Stillness refers to the state in which the position or nature of something remains unchanged. It is important to acknowledge the existence of relative rest:

Only by acknowledging relative stillness can we distinguish things and understand the diversity of matter; Stillness is the measure and link of motion, and without acknowledging stillness, motion cannot be measured or understood. Second, motion and rest are interpenetrating. There is stillness in movement, and there is movement in stillness.

Third, rest is relative, and motion is absolute. Stillness is the stillness of a certain time and a certain range, and it is a special state of motion, while motion is timeless, omnipresent, and eternal. The denial of the movement and its absoluteness is a metaphysical worldview; Denying the existence of relative stillness leads to relativism and sophistry.

They all sever the dialectical relationship between motion and rest in different ways.