Do you think the debate is more important than the outcome or the depth of the discussion?

When discussing what is more important, it really depends on your attitude towards the debate competition.

The more you lack, the more important it will be to you.

Assuming that there is no essential difference in your sense of victory and defeat and the depth of discussion itself, perhaps the degree of substitution that will influence you should be.

As far as I'm concerned, there are many places where the sense of victory and defeat can be replaced, and there are not many places that can be replaced by allowing myself (I dare not say that expression can help others think) to listen to and see different voices more.

Have you always disliked the swollen debate competition? ╮(so ?My personal opinion is that there is no winner in a debate.

Even if you speak sharply, give good examples, and slap the other person's face in minutes, can you really convince the other person? Really make people admit defeat and accept your statement? The boat of friendship capsizes in minutes(* My preferred way is the kind of discussion that is right or wrong (of course, it has to be with people with similar ideas), and each has its own opinions, so that this kind of atmosphere can better exchange opinions.

I'm limited in my skills, but I never find the two contradictory. If you are conflicted because of your own ability, for the sake of the team, victory or defeat is more important, and for yourself, you still have to try your best to pursue depth.

I think this involves a question of expressive ability, and it is reasonable to choose a clear argument to fight, otherwise it is definitely not a good choice to make everyone confused. In the case of being able to explain clearly, the more complex the argument, although there is more time to explain, the time required to dismantle it should also increase, and it is not necessarily that the more complex the argument, the weaker the explanatory power......If so, then the coach should be dragged out and shot for five minutes ......

If you really love it, you will find that depth is more important. The deeper significance of the debate competition is that the following audience will leave some thoughts in their hearts after watching the verbal confrontation, so that the audience can gain something. A debate tournament that only focuses on language confrontation is like a special effects film, how to do it.

And the classics that have been handed down are often gradually dug deep and finally shocked the depths of the heart.

This weekend should be the last game I'll ever play, I hope to have a good time, it doesn't matter if you win or lose, but if you put it in the past, you will definitely try to win.

Debate is a very free environment, many debaters are students, especially students are very free, free to the point that they like it, it's as simple as that. Then no one is forcing you to ask all the questions, what you should do is ask yourself. What do you expect as a preparer debater for a debate match?

I'm going to be busy, and I'll write the rest later, go to work.