Are liberal arts suitable for questioning tactics? Does the college entrance examination question se

It's not very suitable, it's better to memorize it more and understand more.

It can only be said that any subject is suitable for the sea of questions! See if you have that energy.

As a person who has come over, I think that liberal arts are not suitable for sea tactics, no matter how many questions there are, the knowledge points examined cannot run out of the textbook. As long as you have a firm grasp of textbook knowledge, you can cope with it freely no matter how renovated and varied the question types are. It is advisable to use relevant tutorial books, and it does not need too many, one is sufficient.

Generally, the tutorial book will list the detailed knowledge points, and will tell the important and difficult points, and the exam is nothing more than those knowledge points. Personally, I feel that the "Middle School Textbook Learning Handout" issued by Henan Tianxing Education is OK, the knowledge points are clearer, and there are not so many questions, which is more suitable for high school students. You can buy it and take a look.

I've used it.

This problem can not be generalized, first of all, I am a teacher of high school Chinese, I talk about politics, my teaching method is to fully prepare the lesson, explain the knowledge points clearly, the focus is clear, and then ask the students to memorize, just memorization is not enough, you must do typical question practice, a set of questions is not good, you must make easy mistakes to understand, not do blindly.

Middle School Textbook Learning Handout" is good, I have used it, and it is also from Henan Tianxing Education, so it is recommended that you use it

Suitable , which can consolidate knowledge. Deepen memory, but not rote memorization.

I feel that it is more important to understand, the more questions you do, the more you repeat, the more knowledge points, just master it, there is no need to do too many questions.

I think the sea of questions tactic is quite useful, especially for mathematics, physics and chemistry. I have done a lot of questions, and I am not afraid to encounter difficult problems and strange problems. In terms of language, doing more questions and doing good questions is also the accumulation of knowledge, after all, multiple-choice questions can't escape those ranges, do more and remember more!

There is a knack for poetry appreciation, and only a few questions are examined. In English, the main focus is on memorizing vocabulary.

It does work. A good memory is not as good as a bad pen, practice makes perfect. Having done so much, it's not surprising that you can figure out the answer at a glance.

It is useful, it trains your mind and calms your mind.

Particularly useful. Unless you can think of another way, you can make up the lessons, and if you have the money, you can go.

This should be what we students often think about, and when the test papers are overwhelming, we will complain like this: Is it useful to just do it? That's right, it's useless to just do it!

The current system requires us to take exams, and exams are all about doing questions. So what we have in front of us is how to do the problem. I remember a very smart boy in the class said:

There are not many questions to be done. In fact, a lot of learning is good.

Useful but be sure to guarantee the quality.

For the purpose of doing problems, I think there are two aspects: one is to make perfect and improve speed, and the other is to draw inferences from one another, and master the ideas and skills of solving a certain type of problem by doing problems, so as to be able to solve similar problems freely.

Students should not only pay attention to how many questions they do, but also need to train their proficiency in basic knowledge and the amount of questions they can solve correctly in a unit of time.

In addition, from the perspective of formal examinations, it is absolutely normal for students to have questions that students have not seen during the examination, otherwise it means that there is something wrong with the quality of the examination papers. Only by strengthening the training of the efficiency of doing questions can students better adapt to the rhythm and tense atmosphere of the examination, and calmly face the familiar or unfamiliar questions on the test papers, so as to ensure that they can play a normal level.

Of course it's useful, there are more questions, and there are more question types, and you will always see familiar question types during the exam, and you won't panic when you do it.

If it's useless, will I ask you to do it, the teacher is not a fool.

Especially before the first stage without a final total review.

More ** question papers, the wrong questions to write at the wrong time, you don't have to spend too much time reading the type of meeting in the future.

Before the college entrance examination, I don't use much questions, but I summarize the conceptual methods and review and appropriately targeted questions. There is also time to warm up for the college entrance examination questions over the years. Useful.

Question Sea Tactics**When someone learns from people who are better at learning, people who learn well often say that they can learn well by doing more questions, which also leads to the deviation of some people's understanding of question sea tactics.

Disadvantages: The original intention of the question sea tactic is not to do a lot of practice without considering its quality and efficiency, but those who are in a hurry understand it to mean that as long as I do more practice, I can achieve a certain result. Because of this kind of person's eagerness for quick success, he does not pursue quality, but only pays attention to quantity.

Of course, the effect of this kind of question sea tactic is minimal, and it can also be said that it is just a waste of time. Therefore, many people have a lot of complaints and even opposition to the tactics of the sea of questions. So its biggest drawback is that it takes too much time.

If you only pursue quantity, the effect is minimal.

Advantages: The real purpose of the question sea tactics is to be well-informed, which is a process of gradually accumulating experience. In addition, I personally think that the "questions" in the "sea of questions" do not refer to the number of questions, but the types of questions.

When we practice something more often, we have more experience, more ways to deal with it, and more broad thinking, so it can be said that our ability has been greatly improved in the process of questioning tactics. Of course, the premise of achieving these effects is to think more and summarize more in the sea tactics, so that the sea tactics can be effective.

If you are more diligent and have a poor memory, I recommend using the question sea tactic. When brushing the questions, you can better remember the knowledge points, so as to achieve the purpose of learning. If you have a good memory, you can choose to classify and summarize the knowledge points, which is more conducive to your digestion of the knowledge points.

The latter is better, and in this way, it can make the child understand the relevant information of the knowledge point more clearly, and the child's mastery ability will become stronger and stronger.

It is better to classify and summarize according to the knowledge points, so that some of the knowledge you learn is very clear and you can have a good system.

It is better to classify and summarize the knowledge points, because after doing a good job of classification, you can let yourself understand all this knowledge, and after seeing the exercises, you can use and feast on these knowledge.