Is the property liable for an elderly person falling and injuring himself?

The property belongs to the managers and operators of the community, and they have the obligation to ensure that the facilities and equipment in the community are qualified, and the public security environment is safe. If the party falls down and suffers damage in the community due to the property failing to perform its obligations in a timely manner, the party has the right to claim tort liability from the property, unless the property can prove that it is not liable.

Then it depends on what is going on with the cement pier on the side of the road, if it is a property that suddenly appeared and is not marked, remind everyone to pay attention, then the property is responsible, if it is the roadside in order to prevent everyone from falling to somewhere below, the iron chain is installed above, everyone knows that there has always been this thing, then the property is not responsible.

If the location of the cement pier in the community is inaccurate, which affects the traffic, or there is no warning sign, then the property company should compensate the elderly for medical expenses.

Depending on your question, this should be at your own risk. The property should be free of liability.

In line with the principle of who adduces the evidence, unless you can prove that the item has a potential safety hazard, and the property has not fulfilled the obligation to receive.

The elderly were tripped and injured by the cement pier on the side of the road in the community, which is not the responsibility of the property, and the elderly and their guardians need to bear the responsibility, because the cement pier is not on the road and does not affect the normal walking of passers-by.

In this case, it depends on whether the existence of the cement pier is reasonable, and if it is reasonable, it is not the responsibility of the property. If it is unreasonable, it depends on what the ** of this thing is. Whoever is the best person in this thing is responsible.

There are two possibilities for this situation, if the cement pier has been in that position, the old man will have to be responsible for it after he trips. If this cement pier moves the property construction to a new location, and there are no lights at night. The property is responsible.

If the elderly fall and are injured, the property will not be held responsible, and the elderly fall and injury are caused by their own reasons. So there should be the old people themselves who are responsible. Because the cement pier is mainly placed in the position of isolating traffic, it does not affect the traffic.

The elderly fell and injured themselves in the community, and they tripped over the facilities in the community, and the property of the community is directly responsible, and the elderly should be compensated, which is not in doubt!

If the cement pier is in the community, and it affects the normal traffic, the property company did not clean up, resulting in the elderly falling and injured, the property company should compensate, if it is an isolation pier, the old man did not see himself stumbling and was responsible.

Drill into your description, the property did not clean up the cement pier, there is fault, similarly, the family of the old man is also a little responsible, did not take care of the old man, the property bears most of it, and the family bears secondary responsibility.

I don't think you can blame the property for this, this water London should be there for a long time, you can't just because you have tripped up, it feels like the property is responsible, as adults, we should have the ability to recognize this, and we should not keep pushing all the problems on other people's heads.

Legally speaking, whether the property company should be held liable depends on whether the property company has this kind of responsibility, or fault liability, if not, what is the basis for compensation? !

If the cement pile on the side of the road is set up with approval, then the property has no liability and does not need to be completely compensated.

If it is an illegal building, it will bear part of the liability for compensation.

Whether the elderly fall in the community or not, the property needs to be responsible, and it depends on whether the elderly fall because the property facilities are imperfect or damaged, causing unsafe injuries to the elderly. If it is because of the facility problem, you can negotiate with the property to solve it.

The elderly tripped over the cement pier in the community, if there are warning shelters around the cement piers, then the property is not responsible, but if there are no shelters or warning signs and other warning signs, then the property has a certain responsibility.

The property is not responsible, because this kind of isolated cement pile has no impact on the traffic, and it plays a role in protecting the traffic, and the elderly fall and injury are caused by their own reasons.

The elderly are in the community, if the cement pile is stored on the side of the road, if the cement pile is on the road in the community, then this cement pile, and it is property construction. No, clean up. And caused the fall of the elderly, then the property is responsible.

If the cement is obviously in the middle of the road, or it is particularly bright and the old man falls, then they are also responsible, if the cement pier is only on both sides of the road, let people ride, then, this property is not constructed, responsible.

This must be the responsibility of the property, because this is a public place in the community, but the cement pier on the side of the road is not placed in place, which caused the elderly to fall, and there is neither a warning sign nor a special person to take care of it, so it is the responsibility of the property.

Where managers of public places such as hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, and entertainment venues, or organizers of mass events, fail to fulfill their obligations to ensure safety and cause harm to others, they shall bear tort liability. The community was knocked down by the cement piers on the side of the road, which made it difficult to determine responsibility.

It mainly depends on what the situation is, and it depends on the specific situation. If the community is littered, vehicles are parked disorderly, there are potholes on the road or floor tiles fall off and cause tripping injuries, then the property company will bear the main responsibility.

This must be the responsibility of the elderly, and if you have to find a property, it will be a small amount of compensation at most. It's just that there are too many malicious disputes, and if it is really judged from the law, then the property does not need to be held responsible.

Who owns this cement pier? If it is brought by the community, then the developer is responsible, and if it is the owner's, then the owner is responsible, but in both cases, the property has a responsibility for not checking for potential safety hazards. Two.

As mentioned above, the elderly were tripped and injured by the cement pier of the community, which was purely caused by the elderly themselves, and it was not the property that intentionally caused the injury to the elderly, and the property did not have to be responsible for compensating the elderly.

First of all, it depends on whether the cement pier is placed in the correct position, not placed at random, if the old man is unintentionally tripped, then the property is not responsible, but out of humanitarianism will correspond to a corresponding compensation.

The elderly tripped over the cement pier on the side of the road in the community, and the elderly are still responsible for it, and it has nothing to do with the community property, but out of humanitarianism, the community property should comfort the elderly.

There are cement piers on the side of the road, if it is a normal building, if you are tripped up, the property is not responsible, if you are tripped by the curb of the road, can you still find a traffic package? It's a normal building facility, and if it's seen, you can only blame yourself for being careless.

If the property does not have a reminder sign set up. The elderly must be responsible for falling and injuring the property. This is what the property should do and is derelict in its duties.

The elderly fell and injured themselves in the courtyard of the community, and the responsibility does not lie with the property, the key is that the individual is not dexterous in his legs and feet, and there is no guardian to accompany him.

Legal basis: Article 942 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 942 The property service provider shall, in accordance with the agreement and the nature of the use of the property, properly repair, maintain, clean, afforest, operate and manage the common parts of the property in the property service area, maintain the basic order in the property service area, and take reasonable measures to protect the personal and property safety of the owners. For violations of laws and regulations related to public security, environmental protection, fire protection and other laws and regulations in the property management service area, the property service provider shall promptly take reasonable measures to stop it, report to the relevant administrative department and assist in handling it.

If the elderly fall in the community, the property company has certain management responsibilities and safety guarantee obligations. It is necessary to make a judgment based on the actual situation, such as whether there is fault and whether it is notified in advance.

In view of the fall of the elderly in the community, it is necessary to comprehensively consider many factors, such as: 1Whether the property management company has major faults, such as failing to arrange special personnel to inspect in accordance with regulations, failing to provide timely dredging of drainage pipes, failing to treat slippery and inclined roads, etc., which caused the elderly to fall.

2.Whether the elderly themselves have a certain awareness and ability to prevent it, and whether there are omissions or inadaptability in walking, escalators, etc. 3.

Whether the property management company has informed you in advance of the possible dangers in life, and the elderly themselves are aware of this. Legally, property management companies have certain management responsibilities and security obligations. When there is a situation such as an elderly person falling, the property management company should bear a certain degree of responsibility.

However, it should be noted that if the elderly person is using public facilities or passing through the ground, and the facility or the ground is damaged or loosened, such as sediment, dust or tiles, in this case, the property management company will not be liable for compensation.

If an elderly person is injured after falling in the community, what is the liability of the property management company? In this case, if it is determined that the property management company is at fault, resulting in the elderly falling and being injured, the property management company needs to bear the corresponding liability for compensation. The medical expenses, hospitalization expenses, and lost work expenses required by the elderly will be part of the scope of legal compensation.

The fall of the elderly in the community is closely related to factors such as whether the property company is at fault or not. Therefore, in life, property companies need to maintain and improve public facilities, and at the same time, the elderly also need to strengthen their personal awareness and pay attention to physical safety. In the event of a similar fall, it is recommended that the elderly seek help in time and properly retain the evidence of the accident to avoid a certain impact on compensation.

Legal basis]: Failed sales.

Article 240 of the Property Law of the People's Republic of China The owners and users of the community shall abide by the laws, administrative regulations and the provisions of the Contract Law in accordance with the requirements of the rules and regulations and public order.