What is the concept of equality and what does it mean? How do you explain that?

1. It means that people enjoy equal treatment in social, political, economic, legal and other aspects.

2. Generally refers to equality of status: equality and mutual benefitEquality between men and women |Equality between teachers and students |Same-sex equality.

1: All men are created equal. (This is the most fundamental).

The essence of bourgeois equality lies in the fact that the propertied have the right and the proletarian have no right.

The equality of the proletariat demands the abolition of classes and class differences. Engels pointed out: "The real content of the demands of the proletariat for equality boils down to the demands of the abolition of classes.

Any claim for equality beyond this is bound to be absurd. (Anti-Dühring, People's Publishing House, pp. 109-110.) For the proletariat, "the concept of equality, if it has nothing to do with the abolition of classes, is an extremely stupid and absurd prejudice" (Lenin).

Equality is equality of opportunity, not equality of quantity, otherwise it becomes egalitarianism.

The idea of equality is an idea, a theory, and an ideology.

The meaning of equality is that there is equal care and respect for each other, even if there are differences.

Equality does not presuppose the elimination or suppression of differences. Equality does not imply the equalization or homogenization of human beings, nor does it mean that one form is superior and another is devalued.

Equality is acknowledging and accepting each other's differences, or at least knowing that differences should not lead to exclusivity, marginalization or labeling.

The ultimate equality is that everyone can enjoy the differences between people and bring vitality to this society.

Hello dear, modern society constantly preaches the concept of equality between men and women, but in fact men and women are not equal at all.

First, let's talk about what equality between men and women is. There are two types of equality: the first is undifferentiated equality, and the other is relative inequality in the direction of their respective advantages but is generally equal.

If the equality between men and women preached by society is the first type, then what is the matter with ladies first. In the face of non-discrimination and equality, we all have the same opportunities, so why should we give priority to women? Men and women are not the same, and it is really unfair that different physiques require them to do the same thing.

If it is the second type, it is true that the way of thinking for men and women is concerned.

Therefore, we should cooperate in the division of labor and complement each other, but should there be no difference and equality for the overlapping parts of the two. Each is in an advantageous position in the area where the other is deficient, but in the common part, there should be no difference and equality, which is the real equality of men and women. Let's first think about whether the ladies in life give priority to the inner part of the public area.

Girls go first, ladies use first, ladies eat first, and so on. Are there any gender differences in how these things are used or used? Not really.

These things are not done by individuals, so these things belong to the so-called public area. The so-called equality between men and women is clearly due to the fact that in addition to the advantages of men and women in their respective strengths, girls are also given priority in the public sphere. Is this reasonable?

This society has not been completed in either the first or the second, and men and women are not equal at all.

Some people say that boys let girls do this, but girls are a vulnerable group.

In modern society, except for a few families that still have feudal ideas, girls are the treasure of other families. It is not reasonable for a boy to let a girl, is it because the boy is strong or honest? Don't make a fuss, some boys have less strength than girls.

Don't say that these boys are girls, everyone grew up eating white rice with their limbs, and the boys didn't eat much more than the girls, so why should they have more strength than the girls.

In ancient times, men were inferior to women, but now women are inferior to men. Isn't it advocating equality between men and women? How can inequality still exist?

Equality between men and women is nothing more than a slogan for girls to be given priority. Girls themselves think that they are inferior to boys, so they want to seek the rights of the so-called weak.

The concept of equality here means a basic question, simply put, how do we understand equality? In many cases, this question is regarded as superfluous, consciously or unconsciously, because equality itself is usually regarded as an unspoken value, and accordingly it is applied as a clear or self-evident concept, often even if in theory. Even among the most serious thinkers of equality, the concern is mainly with the scope of application of equality, with little reflection on the concept of equality itself.

The assertion that all men are created equal, or the opposite of the unequal nature of human beings, is often taken as a clear statement in everyday discourse and in theoretical analysis, as opposed to what modern people call an equal society or an unequal society. However, the question here is, do these words of equality refer to the same concept in the above sentence?

There is no doubt that the notion of equality has always been at the source of contention, but the usual concern is with what should be included in the list of benefits for equal distribution, rather than equality as a value in itself. In fact, the real and original cause of most of the disagreements and controversies about the concept of equality is in many cases not in the object to be measured and put into practice in terms of equality, but precisely in the fact that the concept of equality has not only different meanings but also different references in different people, in different contexts and in different theories.

If the concept of equality is not clearly and precisely defined, then all men are created equal, as Rousseau said

In Buddhism, all living beings have the virtue and wisdom of a Buddha, and all living beings are equal. This concept of equality transcends race and is equal to all life. ...Taoism, heaven and earth are all Pangu, and everything is Pangu.

All things have spirits, and you and I are one. This view of equality is broader and is already equal in all dimensions.

There is no official and half-position, and he is designated as a civilian.

1) Refers to the equality of the four surnames advocated by Shakyamuni. The original Brahmanism in India was only the religion of the dominant class, ignoring the help of the people, so it contributed to the rapid rise of some royal and common people. In addition, between the old and the new religious thoughts, there are opposing views among the friends, and they are also formed by class prejudices. Shakyamuni's thought transcends class prejudice, attaches importance to moral significance, excludes artificial classes, and emphasizes the equality of the four castes, and that human birth and lineage do not limit their nobility and inferiority, but only human behavior is noble, so the ideal of equality is first realized in the order led by Shakyamuni.

The so-called equality is the manifestation of its spirit, which is compassion, and Mahayana Buddhism is deeply influenced by this spirit, which is based on the emptiness of the essence of all dharmas, and all the dharmas that exist are equal. When this thought developed into China, it became Buddhism of the idea of the absolute; In addition, the Tiantai Sect and the Huayan Sect advocate that the absolute relationship of all laws is reasonable, the individual things of the laws are related to each other, and the reason is not prepared for the equal, and the matter is different, but the two are the same, and there is a relationship between reason and reason, so they also advocate the theory of equality.

Equality means that social subjects are in the same position in social relations and social life, have the same development opportunities, and enjoy the same rights.

Equality means that social subjects are in the same position in social relations and social life, have the same development opportunities, and enjoy the same rights. Including equality of personality. Despite differences in gender, ethnicity, occupation, economic status, life, etc., people should have the same value and dignity and be in the same social status.

Equal opportunity. Everyone has the potential to create material and spiritual wealth, and all artificial obstacles must be removed, and the monopoly and privilege of all kinds of opportunities by anyone must be stopped, so that human potential and realization can have the same opportunities and environment.

Equality of opportunity is manifested in the economic sphere, which requires equal exchange and free competition, and in the political sphere, it requires equal participation in political activities and the opening of social positions to all.

Equal rights. People have equal rights before the law (including equal obligations, of course), and no one may have privileges above the law. Social equality should be the unity of equality of personality, equality of opportunity and equality of rights.

Equality is not only a measure of social progress, but also a value, principle and moral ideal that a society should pursue in form.