The ancestral grave is in someone else s field, what should people do if they let them move away now

Generally speaking, in rural areas, it is very normal for ancestral graves or cemeteries to be on other people's land, and it is not a new thing, which can be understood as the land used for funerals, even if there is no place for farming, there is no such thing as asking people to move their graves. Anyway, nothing like this has ever happened in my family, and I usually decide to ask for the grave to be moved. There is no such thing as forced land ownership to remove graves.

The best thing to do is to move out quickly, because it's someone else's land, not yours.

It is definitely necessary to move the grave, after all, this is the other party's land, and it is normal for the other party to ask for the grave to be moved.

According to the current customs, it cannot be used, according to feng shui, the predecessors have already occupied the feng shui treasures of this cemetery, and if the descendants go, one is unlucky, and the other is that the feng shui pattern has been occupied, and it is not suitable to be a cemetery. However, in the ancient funerary culture discovered now, there have been stacked cemeteries, that is, the cemeteries are stacked layer by layer on the original foundation, which is no problem according to the culture at that time. The relocated cemetery can only be used as a new cemetery if it gradually disappears from its original appearance in the natural environment, that is, it becomes not a cemetery.

Of course, the cemetery is not in the scope of discussion, the location of the cemetery is not permanent, and the cemetery does not belong to the deceased if the lease is not renewed after the expiration of the year, and it does not pay attention to the feng shui customs of rural funerals, so it can naturally be used by the second person.

It's better not to use it, this aspect is taboo.

After the relocation, if the burial pit continues to be used, it will not be backfilled, and after three years of wind, sun and rain will return to nature, and then fill in the soil in another place, and after another three years, it can be used as a grave.

Whose ancestral grave is it? This is a problem left over from history, and I am afraid that there is no better way than to resolve it through consultation between the parties. Besides, your family's ancestral grave is still in other people's arable land.

There is no law governing how conflicts and disputes in this regard should be dealt with and handled. Either move the grave and bury it together, or open another cemetery to bury your relatives. Now the state practices cremation, opposes burial, advocates cremation, and puts ashes in cemeteries.

It's best to negotiate with the other party in advance, you should be allowed to have a reasonable schedule, and you have to find other places in advance.

It is important to be aware of the situation regarding evictions, to consult with others, and to deal with such issues through specific consultations.

The ancestral grave is in someone else's field. This sentence is used incorrectly. At present, the ownership of cultivated land is the ownership of the village collective, and what he is planting now is only a continuation of the joint production contract responsibility system, and he has the responsibility and right to plant, but strictly speaking, the ownership of this land does not belong to him, but to the village collective.

According to the second round of cultivated land contracting, that is, from the second round of contracting, there will be no change for 30 years, and whoever plants will still be cultivated for 30 years.

In this case, your ancestral grave should be in the field of his contracted responsibility, and the grave should be the first and he should contract later, and the general rule is that when the village committee contracts the cultivated land, it should subtract the land occupied by the grave, and the contractor will not suffer a loss. However, if he adds a new grave head to the grave after he has contracted the land, the descendants of the ancestral grave should be responsible for making up for each other at the local market price. This is relatively reasonable, and in many places it is mostly resolved through non-governmental consultations.

If the other party doesn't want money, doesn't negotiate, and insists on moving the grave, it shows that the two families have a conflict for other reasons, and the other party is playing tricks and saying goodbye. In this case, you should calm down and think about what you are sorry for. Then, find the cause and find a way to negotiate a solution.

I believe that as long as the attitude is sincere, humble and friendly, it will definitely be solved. In your case, a tree triggers a conflict. It's very easy to do, the tree has a tree price, double it according to the market price, and it's not good to give him a supplement.

Besides, buried on the grave, there are many people and things are chaotic, and the other party should also understand. The key is that you should be reconciled. Reconciled, everything is easy to do.

The ancestral grave is in someone else's land, since it is the ancestral grave proves that it is very old, it is before the division, and the whole world is the land, and no one has the right to call for relocation except for the expropriation of the state. Unless I give money to negotiate the relocation, my mother-in-law's family is a landlord, and after the liberation, the land reform has distributed the land to the people, but the ancestral grave we have the right to manage the grave every year, and the family that has been divided planted trees on my ancestral grave, I directly allocated it to him, and the right to use it is his, but it cannot infringe on the ancestral grave, because there is an ancestral grave first, and then it is distributed to him, and the ancestral grave is protected by law, and no one can harm him. If the land is settled, without the consent of the contractor, the negotiation is not good, and the buried cannot be relocated, the deceased is the greatest, what were you doing in the first place?

If the repaired person is not hidden, he has the right not to bury it. One of my relatives is repairing on someone else's territory, and now the price is sky-high, so we gave up, and in the past few days, we have rebuilt it on our own territory.

The ancestral grave is in someone else's land, and if people let it be moved, it must be moved, or it is better to choose a suitable place for burial.

People are now letting them move away, so you can quickly find a feng shui gentleman and let him see that it is more appropriate to move in**. The result is to negotiate with others and take a modest approach so that there is no conflict between the two parties.

You can communicate and negotiate with others, and your attitude must be lowered to let them understand you, or you can rent or buy, or if you can't do it, you have to move out!

Buried in someone else's home? No matter how good feng shui is, it is someone else's, obviously you want to occupy an area, and if you don't want to move, you can negotiate with others to buy the land, or find a feng shui treasure of your own home to move out.