The defendant in the rumor mongering Yang Ying s divorce case was sentenced to pay 30,000 yuan, what

Updated on society 2024-06-05
30 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The rumor-monger compensated 30,000 yuan to the baby and apologized to the baby. This is the age of the Internet, and those who spread rumors should be punished.

    Angelababy is also a very famous star in the entertainment industry, and she has gained a large number of fans by participating in "Run, Brother". The popularity has also been greatly improved, angelababy is becoming more and more popular, and it often breaks the news that she and Huang Xiaoming have divorced. Especially in the past two years, as long as Angelababy has any new dramas.

    She will be on the last hot search, and some people distort the facts, saying that she and Huang Xiaoming have divorced. <>

    On September 4, the Beijing Internet Court released a civil judgment in a case involving Angelababy's right to reputation. According to the verdict, Angelababy took the rumor-mongers to court. The defendant Li claimed on the social platform that the baby was divorced, and the content of the article had many fabricated rumors to insult and personally attack Angelababy, and the Beijing Internet Court ruled that the defendant should compensate the baby for mental damage of 10,000 yuan and economic losses of 5,000 yuan, totaling 30,000 yuan.

    According to the judgment of the Beijing Internet Court, the rumor-monger Li will also make a public apology to Angelababy, and the time to apologize on the Internet is not less than 90 days. This case is also a lesson to these rumor-mongers, and they should not be allowed to continue spreading rumors. <>

    Li once said on social software that Angelababy and Huang Xiaoming divorced personally for the sake of entertainment resources. Especially during Gao Yixiang's death, Angelababy had unprofessional behavior at work in order to protect his health. Li spread these inappropriate rumors just to attract readers.

    didn't know that it had a great impact on Angelababy's life, so Angelababy took Li to court and used the law to defend himself.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    apologized to Yang Ying and said that he had realized his mistake and would not spread rumors in the future.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The rumor-mongers spread rumors for no reason, causing great damage to Yang Ying's reputation. In the end, the court ruled that the defendant needed to compensate Yang Ying for mental damage of 10,000 yuan and economic losses of 5,000 yuan, totaling 30,000 yuan.

    The rumormongers paid the financial price for this.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The rumor-mongers did not recognize their mistakes, but went their own way and did not have the slightest idea of correcting them.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Everyone is not perfect, and it is impossible for everyone to like everyone, ordinary people, and celebrities are even more so. Stars in the entertainment industry, because they are very famous, while many people like them, there are also many people who will dislike them, and even spread rumors about them. Angelababy can be said to be a female star who is very famous and has a lot of fans, but she also has a lot of people hacking her, and even making up things out of nothing to spread rumors about her.

    In the face of rumors, Angelababy took up the law ** to defend his reputation. So about Angelababy's right to reputation case to win the lawsuit, will you choose the same approach as her in the face of rumors? Here's what I think:

    1. In the face of rumors, I will choose to be the same as her.

    In the face of rumors, I will definitely take up the law like angelababy to defend my reputation. If they don't take a tough attitude at the beginning, they will intensify their efforts, so in the face of rumors, they must defend their reputation in a timely manner, collect evidence, and let the law adjudicate.

    2. Those who spread rumors should be punished by law.

    Rumor-mongers generally have a very vicious idea in their hearts, and all the bad words and malicious thoughts are vented on other people. Such people must be punished by the law, and they must be made to know that they are responsible for what they say.

    3. I hope everyone can be a tolerant person.

    Many people on the Internet, because they are in a virtual environment, will infinitely amplify the malice in their hearts, keep spreading rumors, and attack others with vicious words. This is very stupid. I hope we can all be generous and civilized.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    I think I will choose the same approach as her in the face of rumors, because it concerns my right to reputation, so I must choose to protect my right to reputation and protect it through the law.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Yes, because rumors are still very serious about their reputation, and this kind of behavior cannot be tolerated, so it is necessary to collect evidence and find a lawyer to strictly investigate these rumors.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Yes. After all, the harm caused by the other party to himself is too great, and it is normal and supported by the law to choose legal rights to protect his own interests.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The court ruled in accordance with the law that the defendant (a netizen named "I am Weiweibao" on Weibo) must issue an apology statement at the top of the network involved in the case for 30 consecutive days, apologize to Angelababy, and compensate a total of 60,000 yuan for the loss of mental damage solatium and reasonable rights protection expenses.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Yang Ying (Angelababy) won the first instance of the online infringement liability dispute case, and Yang Ying was compensated 25,000 yuan, which caused heated discussions among netizens. It is understood that the defendant is a user of the Douban platform, and he released a post entitled "Liu ** and AB Who has a lot of black material?" through Douban. The article conveyed insulting remarks against Yang Ying to the public.

    After a public trial by the Beijing Internet Court, the court held that the insulting words such as "wild model" and "little three" used by the defendant in the infringing article published in the case had caused direct damage to Yang Ying's image and constituted an infringement of her right to reputation, so it ruled that Yang Ying should be compensated for mental damage and economic losses totaling 25,000 yuan. Before **, the defendant had posted an apology on the Douban platform.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    In the end, Angelababy received a spiritual solace payment, and also apologized accordingly in a timely manner, and finally received a compensation of 50,000 yuan.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Tencent News user Yu and Sina Weibo user Shen were convicted of insulting and defaming Yang Ying and infringing on Yang Ying's right to reputation by publishing a large number of serious insulting and defamatory remarks against Yang Ying in their registered Tencent News "Tencent Netizen" and Sina Weibo "Wendi Xiaosan Shangji" respectively. The court ordered Yu and Shen to publish an apology statement on the network involved in the case in accordance with the law, and compensated Yang Ying for mental damages and economic losses totaling 90,000 yuan.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The other party compensated her for her mental losses and solace money, with a total of 90,000 yuan in economic losses. Therefore, don't think that you don't have to bear legal responsibility for speaking on the Internet, you must control your mouth, and don't slander others casually.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    There are all kinds of things in our daily lives, but as our lives improve and our incomes rise, we pay more and more attention to some of our spiritual enjoyment. Therefore, people use certain ways and channels to make their mood happy and their curiosity to be satisfied. Celebrities also provide us with some spiritual enjoyment in this regard, because some of the performances they perform, and even some of the film and television works they starred in, are what we love to watch.

    And celebrities also have some of their private lives, but these private lives are very easy to be rumored about. There is one thing in the hot spot, that is, the defendant in the rumor Yang Ying's divorce case was sentenced to 30,000 yuan. As soon as this incident was released, it was hotly discussed by netizens.

    Netizens are more interested in this matter and have expressed some of their opinions on this matter. The following are some of my views on the fact that the defendant in the divorce case of Yang Ying was sentenced to 30,000 yuan. <>

    I think this incident must be something that this defendant did wrong, and he spread rumors about public figures on the Internet to affect some social order in our daily life, and also disrupted some law and order on the Internet. Therefore, he must be punished somewhat, but the compensation of 30,000 yuan is only a small punishment. Because for celebrities, the 30,000 yuan is probably not a big number, so it is just so that this rumor-monger can be punished by the law, or to save some of the celebrity's reputation.

    This is certainly a lot of money for ordinary people, but it is enough for them to feel that what they are doing is indeed wrong, and it is also a violation of some relevant laws and regulations of our country. As a public figure, Yang Ying's reputation and the existence of some rumors can affect her reputation, so Yang Ying will definitely pursue this matter in this regard, and the compensation of 30,000 yuan is also some relatively fair judgments made by the court. Personally, I am quite supportive of the judgment in this regard, and I think this judgment is just right.

    To sum up, that's my opinion on this matter. <>

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    I think the verdict is right, rumors have always been based on one mouth, and many people think that they do not have to bear legal responsibility for speaking on the Internet, so they unscrupulously make nonsense, causing trouble to other people's lives and reputations. Although most of the privacy of celebrities is **, it does not mean that they will not use the law ** to protect their families, this matter can be regarded as a warning to most people and purify the Internet environment.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    First of all, this rumor-monger himself violated the reputation rights of others, so the defendant claimed 30,000 yuan, which is also Yang Ying's formal means of protection, whether it is a celebrity or an ordinary person, it cannot be slandered casually, so I still very much agree with Yang Ying's approach.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The judgment is good, celebrities are also people, and they also have their own private lives, and other people's married lives don't need anyone to talk nonsense.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    I believe that the act of spreading rumors is extremely bad and has a great impact on the physical and psychological aspects of the person concerned. Regarding the rumors that the defendant in Yang Ying's divorce case was sentenced to pay 30,000 yuan, I can only say that I am to blame, what does it matter to you if people don't divorce, don't think you are righteous and nosy.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Personally, I think so. The damage caused to Yang Ying by the rumors is very great, and it has brought a lot of inconvenience to her life, so I think this verdict is right.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    On September 4, the Beijing Internet Court released the "First Instance Civil Judgment of Yang Ying and Li Yongjun's Online Infringement Liability Dispute", and finally Yang Ying won the lawsuit, and Li Yongjun spread rumors about Yang Ying and Huang Xiaoming's divorce and was sentenced to pay 30,000 yuan in compensation.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    I think this judgment is correct, and it can be regarded as a warning to rumor-mongers, so that it can also prevent online rumor-mongers from harming people.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Do it yourself, on the Internet now, everyone's private life is infinitely magnified, especially artists, giving others privacy should be the responsibility of every Internet citizen, don't try to get involved in other people's lives.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    I think Yang Ying's approach is fine, because if you spread rumors, you have to bear the corresponding legal responsibility, whether it is a celebrity or an ordinary person.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    I think that even if celebrities' gossip is often talked about, such rumors that destroy the family are too much, so severely punishing online abusers is a protection for celebrities and a warning to netizens.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    The Internet is a platform for everyone to communicate, not to do whatever they want, we should respect anyone, do not believe rumors, do not spread rumors, do not spread rumors.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    The defendant spread rumors about Yang Ying's divorce on social platforms, which caused damage to Yang Ying's reputation, and the court sentenced the defendant to compensate Yang Ying for mental damages of 30,000 yuan.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Due to the decrease in the interaction between Yang Ying and Huang Xiaoming, some netizens speculated that the two had divorced, and some netizens believed that Yang Ying had actually divorced a long time ago, because she starred in a TV series with Deng Lun.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Some netizens spread rumors about Yang Ying's divorce, and personally attacked Yang Ying, and verbally insulted her, and finally Yang Ying will sue her, and the court announced that Yang Ying's lawsuit was successful.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    A netizen spread rumors on social platforms that Yang Ying was divorced and personally attacked and verbally insulted her.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Yang Ying claimed 230,000 rumors and sued at least 26 lawsuits, she is really not easy to provoke, but malicious rumors should not be connived upon, after all, some of those who are tolerated have nothing to fear.

    According to an entertainment news report, on the afternoon of August 28, a netizen posted a request for help on the forum, titled: I was sued by Angelababy Yang Ying, what should I do? The text reads:

    really want to pay 230,000 yuan, at the same time as the defendant on Douban, several screenshots were also uploaded, two of which are the details of the trial of the Internet Court, which shows the case of the tort liability dispute between Yang Ying and the netizen, and there is also an indictment signed by Angelababy Yang Ying, the lawsuit requires the defendant to continue to apologize in the newspaper and Douban homepage for a month, and also requests that the defendant be sentenced to compensate the plaintiff for moral damages of 230,000 yuan. Judging from the screenshot sent by the netizen, the case is still under trial, and there is no **, but this netizen was scared, he not only changed his signature on Douban to apologize to Ms. Yang Ying personally, but also quickly sent the apology letter. But the majority of netizens disagree at all:

    Support the artist to sue the sunspot keyboard man, feel that he deserves it, and should think of the consequences he has to bear when he slanders others.

    In fact, not only Yang Ying, many public figures have been maliciously slandered by some black-hearted netizens, some public figures choose to bear forbearance silently, and some are also very angry after being attacked by a lot of language, thinking that repeated tolerance will only bring more harm, and the status quo has not changed. Therefore, some public figures choose to protect their reputation and personality rights through legal means, sue those evil sprays in court, and ask for compensation, but in fact, people don't care about how much compensation is paid, others just want to live their own lives and take their work seriously, rather than suffering malicious gossip after hard work. In fact, this is really unfair to them, I hope everyone has a kind heart and does not maliciously judge others.

    Keep your mouth shut, and don't find out what you've done wrong until you're in trouble.

Related questions
4 answers2024-06-05

Circumstances in which the divorce case is under the jurisdiction of the defendant's location: 1If both husband and wife live together in the place of residence, and one party files a lawsuit with the people's court, the basic people's court of the county or district where they live together is the competent court; 2. >>>More

10 answers2024-06-05

At present, in the trial practice of divorce cases, when the defendant refuses to appear in court without justifiable reasons after being summoned by summons, the court will generally conclude the case in default in accordance with Article 130 of the Civil Procedure Law. In the author's opinion, this is a misunderstanding in trial practice, and the defendant in a divorce case who refuses to appear in court should be summoned to court. >>>More

16 answers2024-06-05

As of July 2021, Yang YingheHuang XiaomingThere is no divorce. >>>More

27 answers2024-06-05

I don't know Li Yang, and my head hurts when I mention English.

8 answers2024-06-05

According to Article 46 of the Marriage Law, if any of the following circumstances leads to divorce, the innocent party has the right to claim damages: (1) bigamy; (2) A person who has a spouse cohabits with another person; (3) Committing domestic violence; (4) Abusing or abandoning family members. >>>More