-
Anonymous users2024-02-11I wanted to buy a card machine some time ago, and I was entangled between these two models for a long time.
In the end, I decided to buy the TX7C
Why is Sony's expensive? It's because Sony costs more than Canon. Canon's production in Japan is outsourced, so the cost is naturally lower. But with the reduction of cost and management, the quality is natural
Moreover, there is no necessary relationship between the quality of the shot and the number of pixels. It's not that the higher the pixels, the better the quality, it also has to do with the sensor. Canon uses CCD (1 , while Sony uses CMOS (1.
As a simple example, can you use 512 memory to drive win7? Got it. The 1400 is not a CCD (1 can do it.
In the end, both are touchscreens, but Sony is slightly better in terms of feel and pixels, not to mention the looks.
Both of them are new, and I personally think it's better to buy TX7C for more than two or three hundred
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10The imaging effect of the camera is not to look at the pixel size, but to look at the CCD area of the lens.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09The difference between the card machine and the pixel is not big, even if it is 20 million, 30 million, it is not necessarily better than the SLR 5 million. After all, the CCD is pitiful small. Sony's new launch,Use a very strong backlight CMOS,The night scene is very good,Large touch screen,Beautiful appearance,High operation line,Strong playability,Panorama mode is very shocking,All more than Canon,So it's natural to be more expensive than Canon。
Who still looks at pixels now, SLR must have looked at it at that time, but the card machine doesn't use it. 1000 is enough to use, and the price is the most convincing.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-08Sony's is expensive for everything.
You can compare laptops, TVs, ***, and similar parameters, Sony's are more expensive than other brands.
Pixels are not the point, a five- or six-inch household wash, 4 million pixels is enough.
If it is not an extreme environment (such as shooting in the house at night, you can't turn on the lights or flash......For example, stretch the camera out of the cat nest to shoot newborn kittens can not turn on the flash), the ** shot in normal light should be the gap that the naked eye can not distinguish, if you can distinguish, it means that you are not familiar with the camera, and it is the same with any camera.
You're still in the stage of struggling with pixels, and those parameters don't have to look at them.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-07Wide angles have deformation problems, whether they are serious or not, just use wide angles less for shooting.
If you don't pay attention to appearance, we recommend you choose the ixus210
More affordable.
I looked at the first few people,I feel that there is basically no problem,I'll add here,I took a look at Zhongguancun's **,The difference between the two machines is about four hundred,SX210I feel like there is one more manual function,There is also optical zoom is fourteen times,I don't think it's worth it for this more than four hundred,I must choose IXUS210 if I choose,Tell me my reason:Let's talk about the advantages of IXUS first MM's wide angle is stronger than SX210 28mm's wide angle,That is, the field of view will be larger when shooting close-up; 2. IXUS210 has a wider aperture range; 3. The display effect of the IXUS210 inch 460,000 pixel display is definitely stronger than that of the SX210 inch 230,000 display; 4. The body is lighter, the battery is stronger, and the touch screen is still there. I think the positioning of the two cameras is different,ixus210 is suitable for ordinary households,sx210 is more suitable for entry-level photography fans who like photography,But there is no money to buy a DSLR,The landlord is opening a shop on **,ixus210 is enough,14X optical zoom you don't use a tripod to shoot out of the basic paste,My ixus80 is 3x light change,Plus the so-called digital zoom (achieved by interpolation operation,It's not interesting),A total of 12x zoom, I stand on the balcony of the dormitory can take a clear picture of the facial features of the people on the playground, 5 times the light change can be imagined whether it is enough for you to use, and the manual function, for people who have never used the camera, it is a chicken rib, useless, you first use the automatic mode to learn to meter, take the camera (try not to shake your hands), choose the scene and the like, and then feel like photography, just go directly to the SLR, the automatic mode is nothing more than your own experience dimmage, shutter, white balance, scene and the like, and then shoot out what others may not be able to shoot**, People who have no photography experience can't use it at all, just use the automatic mode directly, and the playability of the IXUS series is still good for novices! >>>More
Comprehensive tx7 is good, the indicator is also tx7 strong, tx7's ** is in my space, you can take a look. >>>More
The 95 is also quite beautiful, and the imaging effect is also very good. The W220 is as large as the 95ccd, and raising the pixel (which is foolish) is not a good phenomenon and will only reduce the image quality.
Both machines belong to the classic model.
The key to buying a camera is to look at the size of the CCD, which is the same for both machines. >>>More
Canon IXUS850i is too far ahead in photography, ISO has hit the requirements of the entry SLR, if it is in general life, T50 can be competent, if you are not a professional photographer (of course, professional ones buy SLR, these cameras are not considered) then the difference between the two is very small, Sony's is very fashionable, but Canon is still recommended, after all, Canon, Nikon is an expert in cameras, Sony is obviously a lower grade, but Sony's camera is very good.