As soon as he filed for divorce, he took all the goods in the warehouse outside, saying that he had

If you have not yet filed a lawsuit or have filed for divorce, and it is found that the other party has already transferred property, you can apply to the court for property preservation. If the situation is urgent, the party that has not transferred the property may apply to the court for property preservation before filing a lawsuit, and if the court rules to adopt property preservation measures after accepting the application for property preservation before litigation, it shall be enforced immediately. At this time, it is important not to file a lawsuit within 15 days after the preservation measures are taken, otherwise the court will lift the property preservation.

How to deal with the transfer of property after the first instance of divorce.

If you have not yet filed a lawsuit or have filed for divorce, and it is found that the other party has already transferred property, you can apply to the court for property preservation.

1) If the situation is urgent, the party who has not transferred the property may apply to the court for property preservation before filing a lawsuit, and if the court rules to adopt property preservation measures after accepting the application for property preservation before litigation, it shall be enforced immediately. At this time, it is important not to file a lawsuit within 15 days after the preservation measures are taken, otherwise the court will lift the property preservation.

2) In addition, if the pre-litigation preservation requires the provision of secured property, and if the guarantee is not provided, the court will reject the application for property preservation, which also creates an opportunity and opportunity for the other party to transfer the property.

3) In addition, there must be evidence to prove that the other party has transferred the property of the divorce, otherwise the application for property preservation is inaccurate, and the applicant shall compensate the respondent for the losses suffered by the property preservation.

The Supreme People's Court's Several Specific Opinions on the Handling of Property Division Issues in the Trial of Divorce Cases by the People's Courts stipulates that if one party illegally conceals or transfers the property jointly owned by the husband and wife and refuses to hand it over, or illegally sells or destroys it, when dividing the property, the party who conceals, transfers, sells or destroys the property shall be given a smaller share or no share. When dealing with the property in detail, the property that is hidden, transferred, sold, or damaged shall be regarded as the share of the property shared by the party who concealed, transferred, sold, or damaged the property, and the share due to the other party shall be offset against the joint property of the other husband and wife, and if the discount is insufficient, the party who concealed, transferred, sold, or damaged the property shall compensate the other party at a discount. The people's court may handle the party who illegally conceals, transfers, sells, or destroys the joint property of the husband and wife in accordance with the provisions of article 102 of the "Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China".

In order to prevent one party from disposing of property without authorization, it is best not to leave the financial power to one person to manage; If one party disposes of valuable marital property without authorization, the other party should stop it in time, especially when the other party transfers the property in the name of honoring the elders. If you have not yet filed a lawsuit or have already filed for divorce, and it is found that one party has transferred property, you can apply to the court for property preservation. If evidence of the transfer of property by the other party before marriage is found after the divorce, the court may be requested to divide the joint property of the husband and wife again.

Due to the complexity of the property transfer situation, it is recommended to hire a professional lawyer to investigate and collect evidence to protect legitimate rights and interests.

The transfer of property has an extremely bad impact on the parties concerned, after all, their legitimate rights and interests have been infringed, so they need to pay more attention to the actual situation and conduct an effective analysis, so as to protect their rights and interests, but there will be a lot of disputes, so in the actual problem handling, they need to use the relevant laws and regulations reasonably.

As soon as he filed for divorce, he took all the goods in the warehouse outside, saying that he had returned the goods, and in this case it should be a transfer of property, I think you should be sensible, at least find out your family's financial situation, and then go for a divorce.

In fact, it is normal to need to deal with these things well after just getting divorced. If you have anything to deal with, you have to talk to her right away about these stockpiles and so on.

You also have more than half of this money, and at this time you are going to check the accounts, so that you can deal with this money.

Hire a lawyer to intervene early to avoid the transfer of all his assets. In this way, your rights and interests can be protected.

Just ask him for money, and he borrowed your money. As for him giving your money to your sister, then let him take your sister's money and give it back to you.

As soon as he mentioned divorce, he took all the goods in the warehouse out of the warehouse. I said that I returned the goods, what should I do? Then you should go to court to sue him, and it should be said that he hid all the goods on the side.

Just mentioned the divorce, he took care of all the goods in the warehouse, and said that he returned the goods, we can't figure out the specific situation you said, did you say that he transferred assets? In that case, you should quickly find a lawyer to help you.

It seems that he is already going to divorce you, he is ready, he is materially ready, he has sold everything, and you have to keep the relevant evidence.

divorced, he said that he had taken care of all the goods in the warehouse, saying that it was repeated, what should I do? This is certain, if he is serious, he can find a legal channel to make a judgment from the management committee and the police station.

It's okay, this money also has to be counted in the division of divorce property, and it should be half for one person.

In that case, it is obvious that the assets are to be transferred, and you can ask the bottom line.

One person, he will deal with all the goods in the warehouse, saying that it is Whampoa, I think this situation I said that I have no dispute with my own economy, I am sorry to borrow you.

Hello friend, he is unkind to you and unjust, and he has calculated all the money and things related to interests!

Hello, this situation can only be solved by reporting the case, as long as you really don't take his goods, you let him investigate, this kind of friend will be less contact in the future.

My friend said that you can steal his goods, but you have to have evidence, and if you don't have any evidence, you will be framed, and it is useless to call the police, and the police will also ask him to come up with evidence.

Also, is this warehouse only accessible to you? Could it be taken by someone else and you don't even know it?

If he's right, and you don't take it, a third person has gone in.

Then he pulled it away and said that there was less goods, then you should go to report the crime, and it would be very good not only when you reported the crime.

My friend's goods were placed in my warehouse, and he took them away and said that the goods were missing, and reported that I had stolen his goods, and he needed to have evidence, or he was framed.

My friend's goods were placed in my warehouse, and when he pulled them away, there was a lack of a report, saying that he stole it, what should you do? You should check the surveillance, if there is no surveillance, it's okay to report the case.

My friend's goods were in your warehouse, and he took them away and said that the goods were missing, and reported that you had stolen his goods. This should be what he reported to him and asked him to provide evidence.

Friend's goods, put in your warehouse, people say less, then this, you really don't take your own heart understands, if you really didn't take his goods, I think you should go to sue him to sue him, a, infinitely let you, shut down, and the police to help investigate this matter, otherwise, you don't understand this matter, since he has reported the case, why don't you, the security guard, you also have to report the case. If you don't report the crime, it proves that you really took someone else's things.

In this case, I think your friends can check the surveillance in your home so that you can clarify yourself.

Judging from your description, your friend's goods were in your warehouse, and when he pulled them away, he said that there were fewer goods. He said you might have stolen it, but you didn't, and I think you have to argue for it in this case.

Then it depends on whether your warehouse has a camera. If you have a camera, that's the best, if you don't, then there's no way but to let the police get it.

Those who are clear are self-purifying, anyway, you don't do it, just have a clear conscience.

This thing is actually more difficult to do, if your warehouse does not have a camera, then there is actually no evidence of this, but the other party has no evidence of how many goods it has shipped, this friend, you still don't make it in the future.

Friend's goods are in your warehouse, he left, saying that the goods are missing to help me say that you stole his goods, if his friend is guardian, this is easy to say, it is best to find monitoring, because this matter is very difficult.

Is there no monitoring? It's really hard to explain. If it really doesn't concern you, call the police. If you charge him a deposit fee, then you are responsible. If it's just pure help, let him toss it himself.

You can dismiss him, he insisted that you have to come up with evidence, otherwise he is called a mistake, and he is still confused

If he doesn't believe it, let him report it. We have a clear conscience.

You check the surveillance! You call up the surveillance. Just let them investigate. If you didn't steal, then what is there to be afraid of.

Even if he puts the goods in your warehouse, don't you count the trees? Is there any monitoring out there? You can just go and look around, and now there are more people who are monitoring, and then you go to check it.

My friend's goods were in my warehouse, he took them away and said that the goods were missing, and reported that I stole his goods, what should I do? Only facts will prove whether you voted or not.

Let him call the police, he doesn't have any evidence anyway, so don't be afraid of him.

My friend's goods were put in the warehouse, and I think I should give him some to eat, so I don't blame you.

The current situation is mainly due to the fact that the handover work has not been done comprehensively. Since it was orally stated that there were temporary storage goods, although they were not recorded, they should see the physical goods and make a note on the handover order. The person you make can not say clearly, but the person you pick up must be aware of it and ask the other party to indicate it clearly.

Now, you have to find out where the missing goods go, and then try to contact the former warehouse manager, let him assist you to adjust the flow of goods, and explain to him, no matter what, the responsibility is borne by you (even if you don't say so, he will not bear this responsibility now, and it is not helpful for you to investigate the flow of goods), and finally report the results of the investigation to the company's leaders, and show their attitude, first of all, the handover is not comprehensive, the responsibility lies with themselves, and then inform the leader of the whereabouts of the goods, and bear the punishment for dereliction of duty, And not compensation. Since you are the warehouse manager, the goods will not be lost without the hands of the warehouse management, if this is the case, it proves that there are loopholes in the company's management, so the flow of goods is still easy to investigate.

It's very simple, just sue him directly. You can refer to this example, after picking up the money, refuse to return it. The offence should be unlawful possession.

In this case, call the police directly and the police will deal with it. Under normal circumstances, as long as the police intervene, the other party will return it. However, you should handle the round-trip shipping yourself.

The chances of success are high.

The rarest thing is that I don't know who assigned the delivery. Does he have the guts? Can the boss not know? What kind of business are you in charge of? To whom she should admit that she knows what she knows.

As a warehouse employee, he did not play a role in due diligence, and now the goods are less, it is completely his responsibility, even if he does not admit that he sent it, he must also take responsibility accordingly, if the amount is relatively large, the company can call the police! There are police officers involved in the investigation, and his behavior is also dereliction of duty.

If you are sure that the warehouse employee made a mistake, even if the person who received the thing does not admit it, you can't do anything to him, he is legally not responsible, only from the moral and moral aspects. Originally, the employee made a mistake, the original responsibility lies with the employee, occasionally I feel forgivable, and I can deal with it according to the company's system, and at the same time ask why, and it is to ask at an in-depth level, such as, "why did I make a mistake", "carelessly", "why was I careless", "I didn't rest well last night", "why didn't I rest well last night", "I worked overtime for 2 days in a row", until the question is a basic question, which is helpful for the company to change and improve.

Sue him and ask him to bear the warranty liability for the defects of the goods and return the corresponding money.

This kind of only sue the boss and then apply for property preservation, otherwise the money and goods will not be recovered.

In your case, it is a private civil economic dispute, and you can only sue the other party through legal procedures.

Apply to the court to hear and judge the other party to return your payment in accordance with the law.

Go through the legal process and go to the court to sue the seller, who is riddled with debts and false sales.

This kind of remarks is an insult and demeaning behavior, and the boy may have no feelings for the girl, or have an aversion to her, but saying such things is an attack on her personality and values, and it is disrespectful to her performance. It is recommended that girls do not change their self-awareness in order to please others, but believe in the value of self-transport.

The guy means he won't break up with you.

Because he believes that Sakura Madoka is you.

Will not leave Hui Eggplant.

His. He thinks he's going to be able to keep you.

If. Even you.

All. Can't keep it.

Then he doesn't have to go to someone else.

So he's pretty confident in himself.

Hello! You can go to the court to sue for payment of the goods, and if the other party raises quality problems, it will be dealt with at the same time in the case. Specifically, you can consult or entrust a lawyer to deal with it. Hope that helps!

I delivered it to him, and I've been delivering it for more than a year. I've been using my products ever since. Owed money is not given.

And a total of more than 10,000 is owed. It's okay if you don't ask him for money. As soon as you ask him for money, he will say that there is a quality problem with your goods.

Gee, I don't even know how to do it.

Haha, this is to repay the debt, to him to solve the quality problem, and then cheeky every few days to urge a few days to urge, not afraid that he will not give, it is best to call a cheeky person to come to the door to ask for money loudly, he is afraid that the neighbor will know and give it to you, of course not the kind of vicious ha, this kind of customer will generally come in the future.